Mass For Creation and Biome 9: A Biodiversity Forum An Ecological Economics Perspective from the Nabaoy River, Philippines

Science-faith forums are increasingly recognized as informal institutions that influence environmental governance, especially in biodiversity-rich areas where social cohesion is strong. This study examines Mass for Creation and Biome 9: A Biodiversity Forum held near Nabaoy River in Malay, Aklan, as a case of faith-based environmental engagement with economic implications for biodiversity governance. Using a qualitative institutional economics approach and the World Café methodology, this study analyzes how the integration of religious celebrations and scientific dialogue influences environmental values, social capital formation, and nonmarket valuation of ecosystem services. Outputs from four World Café groups were synthesized to assess the outcomes of the forums. Results indicate strengthened norms of stewardship, enhanced multi-sectoral collaboration, and increased recognition of the long-term value of ecosystem services. These findings suggest that science-faith forums can complement formal environmental policies by lowering transaction costs and strengthening collective action for biodiversity conservation.

ecological economics, biodiversity forum, World Café, faith-based institutions, ecosystem services, Philippines

1. Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The World Café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. BerrettKoehler. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., … van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Daly, H. E. (1997). Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development. Beacon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Francis. (2015). Laudato Si’: On care for our common home. Vatican Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Spash, C. L. (2013). The shallow or the deep ecological economics movement? Ecological Economics, 93, 351– 362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria