From Print Culture to Digital Platforms: An Empirical Study on Mobile App-Based Reading and the Transformation of Sri Lankan Publishing Industry

This study examines the nature of the change in the Sri Lankan publishing industry from printed materials to reading using mobile phone applications. Quantitative research approach was utilized to collect data from a sample of 200 readers and analyze the same using SPSS software. ISBN registration records of the National Library and Documentation Services Board, Sri Lanka, were also examined. Findings from the analysis revealed that although print books remain dominant (78.5%), younger generations, especially those aged 19-40, increasingly use e-books and print books, with the older reader base being largely resistant to digital platforms. Smart phones come out as the device of choice for digital consumption of reading, with fiction literary genres such as novels and short stories being mass-consumed digitally. Convenience, portability, low price and ready availability were the main enablers of digital adoption, and technical complexity, lack of digital content, low levels of digital literacy and cost sensitivity the main impediments. ISBN data also confirm an increase in registration of e-books during the COVID-19 pandemic. App-based publishing is however viewed mainly as a colorless factor by readers, which bears witness to an attachment to a print culture. The study confirms that Sri Lanka's publishing sector is not a replacement for print media, but rather one where there is an evolving hybrid model of information in digital form reinforcing conventional publishing. It therefore recommends that publishers, policymakers, and technology developers collaborate to drive increased local language content, boost app usage, adopt low-cost pricing models, and bolster digital literacy programs to facilitate a sustainable development of the digital reading habit of the nation.

Book publishing industry, printed books, e-books, mobile reading apps, reading

1. Andersen, I. (2013). Mobile Apps for Learning English. A Review of 7 Complete English Course Apps: Characteristics, Similarities and Differences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Armstrong, C.J., Edwards, L., & Lonsdale, R. (2002). Virtually there? E-books in UK academic libraries. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 36(4), pp 216-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bailey, Timothy P., Best, Rickey D., Scott, Amanda L., (2015). Cost Differentials between E-Books and Print in Academic Libraries. College & Research Libraries, Vol. 76 (1), pp 6-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baron, Naomi S. (2015). Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Byars. M.N. (2015). Printed Books versus Digital Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chu. E.(2009). Android Market Update Support. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cowan, C. (2013). Printed books versus e-book formats: a study using niche gratification theory The University of Alabama. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cumaoglu. G, Sacici. E & Torun. K. (2013). E-Book versus Printed Materials: Preferences of University Students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(2), pp121-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dolgaya. D. (2018). Evolution of Mobile Applications. MATEC Web of Conferences [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gamage. K. P. (2024). Digital Reading Behavior of Generation Z in Sri Lanka: With Special Focus on Senior Secondary School Students. University of Kelaniya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gordon. (2022, April 15). Uses and Gratification Theory Explained the Business Professor, LLC Retrieved February 5, 2023, from https://thebusinessprofessor.com/communications-negotiations/usesand-gratification-theory-explained [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hamblen, M. (2011). Amazon: E-books now outsell print books. Computerworld. Retrieved. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hsieh, Y., & Huang, S. (2020). Using an E-book in the secondary English classroom: Effects on EFL reading and listening. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1285-1301. (http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10036-y) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kang, Q., Lu, J., & Xu, J. (2021). Is e-reading environmentally more sustainable than conventional reading? Evidence from a systematic literature review. Library & Information Science Research, 43(3), 101105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Krisper. M. & Rupnik. R. (2009). Mobile Applications: A New Application Model in Information Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Leelaratne, Upali. (2010). Printing Technology. Colombo 10, Godage & Brothers Private Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lerner. G.A. (2023). Compare and Contrast: Print vs. eBooks. General Arts and Sciences, Georgian College [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Liu. Q & He. X. (2014). Using mobile apps to facilitate English learning for college students in China. Bachelor`s thesis in Informatics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Meštrović. D, Bagarić. L & Marot. N.J. (2018). Acceptance of E-Book Reading Applications – Scale Development and Validation. Tourism & Hospitality Industry 2018, Congress Proceedings, pp. 246-259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. OECD. (2012). E-books: Developments and Policy Considerations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Park. J & Lee. J. (2021). Effects of E-Books and Printed Books on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Grammatical Knowledge. English Teaching, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 35-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rao & Leena. (2011). Apple's App Store Crosses 15B App Downloads, Adds 1B Downloads in Past Month. TechCrunch. AOL Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sage, K., Augustine, H., Shand, H., Bakner, K., & Rayne, S. (2019). Reading from print, computer, and tablet: Equivalent learning in the digital age. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), pp 24772502. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Saleh, Z.I. & Mashhour. A.S. (2015). The Impact of E-Books on The Printed Books: eBooks [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Popularity, Growth and Future. Fifth International on e-Learning (ECONF 2015), Bahrain. Sponsored by IEEE computer Society [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Shin, D. H. (2011) Understanding e-book users: uses and gratification expectancy model New Media & Society, 13(2), 260–278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., & Groner, R. (2010). Improving the usability of e-book readers. Journal of usability studies, 6(1), 25-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Singh. B.P & Madhusudhan. M. (2023). Mobile Apps–Based Applications in Libraries and Information Centers: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Future Research Agendas. International Journal of Librarianship, 8(3), pp.83-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Singh. J. (2017). Trends of eBooks in Digital Era. International Journal of Information Movement Vol.2 Issue VIII, pp 203-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tahara, K., Shimizu, H., Nakazawa, K., Nakamura, H., & Yamagishi, K. (2018). Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of e-books vs. paper books: A Japanese case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Team, B. (2023, January 14). A Brief History of eBooks - BookScouter Blog. BookScouter Blog. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Thalgaspitiya, T., & Hettiarachchi, H. (2022). Generation gap, gender and shopping enjoyment of shopping mall visitors in western province Sri Lanka. Asian Journal of Marketing Management 1(02), 01(11), 30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tosun. N. (2014). A Study on Reading Printed Books or E-Books: Reasons for Student-Teachers Preferences. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – January 2014, volume 13 issue 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Vinney (2019, April 19). What Is Uses and Gratifications Theory? Definitions and Examples a Correlation Study of the Technology Acceptance Model and Higher Education Faculty E-Textbook Adoption ProQuest Retrieved February 5, 2023, from https://www.thoughtco.com/uses-andgratifications-theory-4628333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wang H.-F., & Chiu, M.-C. (2020). Ebook presentation styles and their impact on the learning of children. Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference, 438–443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. WORLD SURVEY OF EDUCATION (111) Secondary education U N E S C O (1961), https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000136496 [Accessed:2022.03.16] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zickuhr, K. and Rainie, L. (2014), E-Reading rises as device ownership jumps. Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project, Washington. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Study of how the Protagonists of Films Suitable for Cinema Therapy Sessions with Students Addresses His Emotional or Psychological Issues: A Case Study of Young Orion from the Film Orion and the Dark
• Anambra Residents’ Knowledge and Perception of Broadcast Media Coverage of the 2024 Local Government Election.
• Translating Environmental Communication Research into Grassroots
• Gender Responsive Disaster Management, Risk Communication, and Improvement in Disaster Resilience and Reduction: Review of Bibliometric Evidence
• Utilisation of AI Chatbot, Leo as a Digital Public Relations Strategy among UBA Customers in South-East, Nigeria