Scaffolding Academic Writing Using AI Assistance: A Systematic Literature Review

In spite of the fast expansion of studies in this area, knowledge about how AI serves as an efficient scaffold for academic writing is fragmented and not systematically synthesised. To fill the gap, this paper provides an extensive systematic literature review analysing the role of AI assistance as a method to scaffold academic writing. The review of the articles was performed following the PRISMA guidelines for methodological transparency and consistency. Next, a series of advanced search strategies structured around 3 thematic keyword clusters was used to systematically search two major academic databases (Web of Science and Scopus) for studies published between 2020 and 2026. The themes found were: (1) learner engagement, agency, and affective responses in AI-assisted academic writing; (2) perceptions, acceptance, and ethics of AI-technologies in academic writing; and (3) pedagogic practices, instructional design & automated feedback in AI-supported writing. After identification, screening, eligibility, and quality assessment, 23 original studies remained for analysis. The reviewed evidence suggests that AI-assisted scaffolding could potentially contribute to academic writing development through fostering motivation, agency, and reducing affective barriers (e.g., writing-anxiety), provided that AI tools are integrated into well-designed instructional frameworks. In addition, the included studies stress a relatively positive outlook on AI technologies by learners and educators with ongoing ethical concerns of IDA tied to academic integrity, dependence, and authenticity. In addition, pedagogically informed teaching-learning environments and mindful application of automated feedback are found to be key elements in enhancing AI-supported writing. Overall, this review suggests that AI can have its greatest impact as a support structure for scaffolding rather than a substitute for instructional guidance, with implications applicable to both practice and policy in the implementation of AI in academic writing instruction going forward.

Artificial intelligence in academic writing, Scaffolding learning, AI-assisted writing

1. Abouzahra, A., Sabraoui, A., & Afdel.K. (2020). Model composition in Model Driven Engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 125(106316). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akhmedjanova, D., Suchkova, S., & Zharkova, N. (2025). Teaching Research Writing with AI: A Case Study of Academic Development Courses in Higher Education. Journal of Language and Education, 11(4), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.26589 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anthony, A., Sharma, S., & Sharma, S. (2025). Is ChatGPT the Future of Academic Writing? A Sequential Explanatory Study to Explore Generative Conversational AI as an Academic Writing Support Tool for Research Scholars. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 45(1–2), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676251353105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Apriani, E., Daulay, S., Aprilia, F., Gafur Marzuki, A., Warsah, I., Supardan, D., & Muthmainnah, M. (2025). A Mixed-Method Study on the Effectiveness of Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing and Students’ Perceived Experiences. Journal of Language and Education, 11(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.17913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barrot, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2026). Learning Styles, Engagement and Anxiety in AI-Mediated Writing: A Multimodal Feedback Study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Carrera-Rivera, A., Larrinaga, F., & Lasa, G. (2022). Context-awareness for the design of Smart-product service systems: Literature review. In Computers in Industry (Vol. 142). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103730 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dizon, G., & Gold, J. (2023). Exploring the effects of Grammarly on EFL students’ foreign language anxiety and learner autonomy. JALT CALL Journal, 19(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v19n3.1049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Du, T. T., Dung, D. T. B., Ly, H. T. B., Huong, N. T. K., Triet, A. M., & Xuan, N. T. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: A Case at A University in Vietnam. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.11210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Farneste, M., & Bicjutko, T. (2025). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTEGRATION IN ACQUISITION OF ENGLISH ACADEMIC WRITING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STUDENT PERSPECTIVES IN SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITY SETTINGS. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 15, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.15.2025.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ginting, R. S. B., & Fithriani, R. (2022). PEER AND AUTOMATED WRITING EVALUATION (AWE): INDONESIAN EFL COLLEGE STUDENTS’ PREFERENCE FOR ESSAY EVALUATION. LLT Journal: Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(2), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.4879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Holmner, M., Hirsh, S., Meyer, A., Mierzecka, A., & Rorissa, A. (2025). The Future of Academic Writing in the Age of Generative AI. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 1241–1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Huang, S., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Exploring the integration of automated feedback among lower-proficiency EFL learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1471083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Khan, Z. I. (2025). Awareness, Adoption, Challenges and Effectiveness of AI Tools in Research Writing: Perspectives of Research Scholars from India and the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Web Librarianship, 19(3–4), 221–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2025.2577988 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kim, M. K., & Kim, N. J. (2022). AI-Supported Scaffolding for Writing Academic Arguments. In C. Chinn, E. Tan, C. Chan, & Y. Kali (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS (pp. 1129–1132). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85145783495&partnerID=40&md5=7dfd0aecd9fe3b71d950afd88098ea92 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kim, M. K., Kim, N. J., & Heidari, A. (2022). Learner experience in artificial intelligence-scaffolded argumentation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1301–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2042792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Review in SOftware Engineering, Technical Report EBSE 2007-001,. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Krajka, J., & Olszak, I. (2024). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS IN ACADEMIC WRITING INSTRUCTION: EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL OF ON-DEMAND AI ASSISTANCE IN THE WRITING PROCESS. Roczniki Humanistyczne, 72(6), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.18290/rh247206.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Li, M., & Tekwa, K. (2025). Timing AI intervention in the writing process for low proficiency learners: relationship with motivation, self-efficacy, and performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-01030-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lo, Y. Y. (2025). Experiences of ESL Students and Instructors Using Grammarly in Academic Writing. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(3), 1313–1331. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i3.40518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Matikainen, T. (2024). Academic writing in English: Lessons from an EMI-program in Japan. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101358 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Milad, M., & Fayez, F. (2025). Perception and Attitudes towards Augmented Reality (AR) Enhanced Academic Writing: Satisfaction Levels. World Journal of English Language, 15(6), 268–288. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n6p268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, A. D. (2009). PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram. In The PRISMA statement (Vol. 6, p. 1000097). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Wu, M., & Ho, T. Y. (2025). Generative AI tools and empowerment in L2 academic writing. System, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ou, A. W., Stöhr, C., & Malmström, H. (2024). Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective. System, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Pakdel, F., Khojasteh, L., Kafipour, R., & Shahsavar, Z. (2025). Navigating AI writing tools in medical education: A SWOT analysis of L2 academic writing perspectives. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251322953 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Peña-Cáceres, O., Sánchez-Rogel, E., Barros-Naranjo, J., Silva-Marchan, H., Espinoza-Nima, R., & Correa-Calle, T. (2025). LINGUISTIC AND VISUAL PATTERNS OF CHATGPT IN HIGHER EDUCATION An Analysis of its Use in Undergraduate and Postgraduate Theses. VISUAL Review. International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura, 17(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v17.5403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Qureshi, U. M., Tong, E. K.-M., Chen, Z. V, Deng, C., & Nandakumar, G. (2025). A Robust and Secure Framework for an AI-Assisted Academic Writing Platform. In T. Hao, J. G. Wu, X. Luo, Y. Sun, Y. Mu, S. Ge, & W. Xie (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: 15589 LNCS (pp. 235–249). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4407-0_20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Rafida, T., Suwandi, S., & Ananda, R. (2024). EFL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION IN INDONESIA AND TAIWAN ON USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO ENHANCE WRITING SKILLS. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(3), 987–1016. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i3.1520 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Roothooft, H., Breeze, R., & Meyer, M. (2025). ENGLISH WRITING COMPETENCE AND EMI PERFORMANCE: STUDENT AND EXPERT PERCEPTIONS OF ACADEMIC WRITING IN EMI. ESP Today, 13(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2025.13.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Smirnova, L. (2025). Developing students’ agency and voice by using generative AI in an online EAP module. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2538781 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Suryanto, S., Habiburrahim, H., Akmal, S., Zainuddin, Z., Safrul, M. S., & Hanani, F. (2024). SCRUTINIZING THE IMPACTS OF GRAMMARLY APPLICATION ON STUDENTS’ WRITING PERFORMANCE AND PERCEPTION. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(2), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i2.1235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tambunan, A. R. S., Andayani, W., Sari, W. S., & Lubis, F. K. (2022). Investigating EFL students’ linguistic problems using Grammarly as automated writing evaluation feedback. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.17509/IJAL.V12I1.46428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tekir, S. (2026). Generative AI use in EFL writing: associations with originality, critical reasoning, and metacognitive engagement in a Turkish higher education context. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2026.2617399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Werdiningsih, I., & Rusdin, D. (2024). Balancing AI and authenticity: EFL students’ experiences with ChatGPT in academic writing. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2392388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar