Flouting Grice’s Conversational Maxims: A Case Study of the 2022 Kenyan Deputy Presidential Debate
Authors
Department of Psychology, Languages, and Humanities Mount Kenya University (Kenya)
Department of Psychology, Languages, and Humanities Mount Kenya University (Kenya)
Department of Linguistics, Literature and Communication University of Kabianga (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100584
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 7537-7550
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-28
Accepted: 2026-02-04
Published: 2026-02-18
Abstract
Political debates are important ventures that have been carried out globally. They show how well candidates can think on their feet, manage stress effectively and what facts they have at their fingertips. Significantly, debates thrust candidates to public examination, prompting them to explain their agenda, defend themselves against the criticism of opponents and explain why they should be elected. Presidential debates have become the norm the world over and many countries in Africa have given such debates prominence especially during political campaigns. With the advent of technology, televised debates have been embraced and media houses in conjunction with other organizations have been in the forefront in organizing such debates in order to give the public a chance to evaluate the preparedness of their candidates for the tasks they are yet to undertake if elected in the positions they are vying for. Television allows attachment between a presidential candidate and the public and it furnishes voters with more factors with which to evaluate candidates. In Kenya, these broadcast debates have become a fundamental part of egalitarian exchange, shaping how citizens judge dependability, management style and preparedness to rule. This study sought to investigate instances in which Grice’s conversational maxims were flouted by two Kenyan deputy presidential candidates during a televised debate that took place in the run up to the 2022 general elections. The study was guided by Grice’s (1975) Cooperative Principle. A qualitative descriptive design was used and excerpts from the debate were purposively selected for analysis. The study revealed that both candidates flouted Grice’s conversational maxims.
Keywords
Pragmatics, Gricean maxim, political discourse, conversational implicature
Downloads
References
1. Al-Shboul, O. K. (2022). Flouting of Grice’s maxims by Jordanian speakers in everyday communication. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(Special Issue 1), 229-239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Buddharat, C., Ambele, E.A., & Boonsuk, Y. (2017). Uncooperativeness in Political Discourse: Violating Gricean Maxims in Presidential Debate 2016 vol 23(3), 179-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Gyasi, R.B & Sarfo-Kantankah, K. S. (2021) A Functional Analysis of Ghanaian Presidential Debates. Drumspeak, Vol. 5 (3). ISSN: 2821-8981 (online) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Jiménez-Preciado, A.L.; Álvarez-García, J.; Cruz-Aké, S.; Venegas-Martínez, F. (2024). The Power of Words from the 2024 United States Presidential Debates: A Natural Language Processing Approach. Information 16, (2). https:// doi.org/10.3390/info16010002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Khaemba, J. M. (2024). The power of words in political discourses of the general election campaigns in Kenya. Journal of languages and linguistics, 3(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.51317/jll.v3i1.494 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Legal Assistance Centre (2015) Information about Namibia Law. Retrieved from https://www.lac.org.naLevison, S.C. (1983). Pragmatic. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Rakhmasari, D.L. (2023). An Analysis of Flouting Maxims in the Second American Presidential Debate. E-Jou (English Education and Literature Journal) Vol. 3(1), 34-45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Longman, London and New York: Longman Group Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Rickie, L. (2010). A new opportunity for democratic engagement: The CNN -YouTube; Presidential Candidates Debates. Journal of information Technology and Politics, 7(2), 202-215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar