Exploring the Relationship between Drafting with Writing Process and Writing Difficulty

Authors

Zakiah Mohd Yusoff

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 UiTM Shah Alam, Selangor (Malaysia)

Siti Aminah Nordin

Solar Research Institute (SRI), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor (Malaysia)

Shakira Azeehan Azli

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Johor Branch, Pasir Gudang Campus, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Fatimah Khairiah Abd Hamid

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Johor Branch, Pasir Gudang Campus, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100605

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 7780-7791

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-28

Accepted: 2026-02-06

Published: 2026-02-19

Abstract

This quantitative study explores the motivation factors for learning among undergraduates, focusing specifically on drafting with writing processes and difficulties. Using a purposive sample of 41 engineering students, an online survey comprising 38 items was administered covering demographic profiles, writing difficulties, planning before writing, translating while writing and editing when revising. The demographic analysis reveals a significant gender disparity with males constituting 64% and females 24% of the sample and highlights a predominantly average English proficiency level among participants. The study identifies major writing challenges such as unfamiliarity with different types of writing, goal-setting complexities and insufficient background knowledge, emphasizing the need for targeted educational interventions. Participants exhibit diverse drafting, planning and revising behaviours including structured drafting strategies, varied planning methods and focused revising practices. These findings suggest that tailored instructional approaches and support mechanisms are essential to enhance writing proficiency and confidence among engineering students. Future research should investigate longitudinal writing development, the impact of technological tools and the role of peer feedback and cultural factors in writing to further improve educational practices and student outcomes.

Keywords

Drafting techniques, writing difficulty, quantitative survey, academic writing, drafting strategies

Downloads

References

1. Abrar, M., Mukminin, A., Fitriani, N., Failasofah, Fajaryani, N., Hadiyanto, Razak, R. A., Mulyono, H., & Ningsih, S. K. (2023). Examining the Cultural Adjustment Experiences of International Students in Writing Dissertations in a UK Campus. Qualitative Report, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.4793 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anita, A. S., & Kardena, A. (2021). THE EFFECT OF USING POWTOON TOWARD STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN WRITING. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v6i1.369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ashrafiany, Hasanuddin, & Basalama, N. (2020). The students’ writing difficulties in writing an essay based on cognitive process. Lingua, 16(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bora, P. (2023). Importance of Writing Skill to Develop Students’ Communication Skill. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 7(35). https://doi.org/10.54850/jrspelt.7.35.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cahyono, B. Y., & Rahayu, T. (2020). Efl students’ motivation in writing, writing proficiency, and gender. Teflin Journal, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v31i2/162-180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Campbell, Y. C., & Filimon, C. (2018). Supporting the Argumentative Writing of Students in Linguistically Diverse Classrooms: An Action Research Study. RMLE Online, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2017.1402408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cardenas-Hagan Ed, E. (2020). Literacy Foundations for English Learners: A Comprehensive Guide to Evidence-Based Instruction. Brookes Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chien, P. F. W., & Khan, K. S. (2023). Systematic Review Reporting - Writing concisely and precisely. In Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences (Vol. 39, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.7428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Graham, S. (2018). A Revised Writer(s)-Within-Community Model of Writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the Common Core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Elementary School Journal, 115(4). https://doi.org/10.1086/681964 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., Harris, K. R., & Fishman, E. J. (2017). The relationship among strategic writing behavior, writing motivation, and writing performance with young, developing writers. Elementary School Journal, 118(1). https://doi.org/10.1086/693009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., & Fitzgerald, J. (2007). Best Practices in Writing Instruction. Solving Problems in the Teaching of Literacy. In Guilford Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hynninen, N. (2018). Impact of digital tools on the research writing process: A case study of collaborative writing in computer science. Discourse, Context and Media, 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lababa, L., Asrifan, A., Hanafi, M., Khalik, S. J., & Saifullah, S. (2023). Improve Writing Skills In Junior High Students Via Whatsapp Messenger. La Ogi : English Language Journal, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.55678/loj.v9i2.1024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lane, K. L., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Weisenbach, J. L., Brindle, M., & Morphy, P. (2008). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing performance of second-grade students with behavioral and writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466907310370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Li, K. L., Razali, A. B., Samad, A. A., & Noordin, N. (2020). Effects of digital writing software as a tool for process approach to writing on teacher trainees’ academic writing performance. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.4.12.1346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. McCutchen, D., Teske, P., & Bankston, C. (2009). Writing and cognition: Implications of the cognitive architecture for learning to write and writing to learn. In Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410616470-40 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Melon-Galvez, S. (2016). Bridging the Gap between Filipino Students’ Expectations and Teaching Approaches in ESP Class. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(7). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Padilla, M. A., Solórzano, W., & Pacheco, V. (2009). The effects of text analysis on drafting and justifying research questions. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Petray, M. J., Shapiro, R., & Vega, G. M. (2021). Foundations of Linguistics and Identity in L2 Teaching and Learning: Agency through Linguistic Enrichment, Differentiated Instruction, and Teacher Identity. In International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction (Vol. 13, Issue 3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Saulsburry, R., Kilpatrick, J. R., Wolbers, K. A., & Dostal, H. (2015). Getting Students Excited about Learning: Incorporating Digital Tools to Support the Writing Process. Odyssey: New Directions in Deaf Education, 16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Silcha, W. N., Mukminatien, N., & Ivone, F. M. (2016). Developing a web-based argumentative writing media for students of English department. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sundari, H., & Febriyanti, R. H. (2022). How do EFL university student-writers prepare their draft? An analysis of writing strategy use in EFL writing instruction. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i2.10374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Suprapto, M. A., Anditasari, A. W., Sitompul, S. K., & Setyowati, L. (2022). Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions towards the Process of Writing. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.765 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wright, K. L., Hodges, T. S., Dismuke, S., & Boedeker, P. (2020). Writing Motivation and Middle School: An Examination of Changes in Students’ Motivation for Writing. Literacy Research and Instruction, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1720048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Zhao, X. (2023). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology for English Writing: Introducing Wordtune as a Digital Writing Assistant for EFL Writers. In RELC Journal (Vol. 54, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221094089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zhao, X., Hu, J., & Cox, A. (2024). Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Student Academic Writing in Higher Education : The Use of Wordtune by Chinese international students. Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles