Influence of Teachers’ Accountability on Learners’ Learning Engagement

Authors

Bethel Ann T. Redosendo

San Vicente Elementary School Department of Education (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200025

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 256-266

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-03

Accepted: 2026-02-09

Published: 2026-02-21

Abstract

Teacher accountability plays a vital role in promoting learners’ academic engagement. This study examined the relationship between teachers’ accountability and learners’ learning engagement among Grades 1 to 6 pupils at Lupiagan Elementary School during the School Year 2023–2024. Specifically, it assessed teachers’ accountability in terms of duty and responsibility, communication, and expectations, as well as learners’ engagement in oral recitation and participation in performance tasks. A descriptive–correlational research design was employed. Data were collected from 124 learners using a modified questionnaire adapted from Dargusch (2018). Mean, standard deviation, and Pearson’s r were used for data analysis.

Keywords

teacher accountability, learning engagement, duty and responsibility, communication

Downloads

References

1. Abah. (2023). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. The World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Dehdradon. (2023). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Demas, A., & Arcia, G. (2019). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Desimone, L. (2021). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ehindero, S., & Ajibade. (2019). Teacher evaluations and professional development: How do teacher evaluation methods correlate with reported professional development support for teachers? Educational Policy, 29(1), 3–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ferdig, R. (2020). Virtual schooling standards and best practices for teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 479–503. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Folger, R. (2020). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Manalo, F. (2020). Secondary teachers' preparation, challenges, and coping mechanisms in the pre-implementation of distance learning in the new normal. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(3), 144–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. McCarthy, & Cater. (2020). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nkedishu. (2021). Teacher quality and educational equality: Do teachers with higher standards-based evaluation ratings close student achievement gaps? Education Policy Analysis Archives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Randolf. (2021). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ruiz. (2022). Teacher performance pay: A review. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 909–949. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Saunders, & Mills. (2019). Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), 101–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sng Bee. (2020). Does student sorting invalidate value-added models of teacher effectiveness? An extended analysis of the Rothstein critique. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 298–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wellie. (2021). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2), 267–271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Yuan, F. (2021). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles