Job Characteristics and Task Performance of Public Sector Employees in Sri Lanka: Mediating Role Work Engagement
Authors
Department of Business Management, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, P.O. Box 02, Belihuloya (Sri Lanka)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1014MG0034
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/14 | Page No: 413-425
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-04
Accepted: 2026-02-09
Published: 2026-02-21
Abstract
The primary aim of the current study is to examine whether job characteristics and task performance of public sector employees in Sri Lanka's Western Province are mediated by employee work engagement. A quantitative research design was used in the study and data were collected using structured questionnaire from public sector employees by using stratified random sample. Reliability testing, correlation, multiple regression, moderation analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used in the analysis of 361 valid responses using SPSS Version 25. The results showed that employee task performance is much improved by both job characteristics and work engagement. Additionally, the association between job characteristic and employee task performance is partially mediated by work engagement. As a result, job characteristics have an impact on employees' task performance both directly and indirectly through work engagement. As a result, each effect is considerable. According to the current study's findings in order to sustain and improve employee task performance, public sector organizations must adopt tactics that foster both job characteristic and work engagement. The findings support the job demand resources theory and the job characteristic theory, which contend that employees are more engaged at work and perform better on tasks when they have more interesting and fulfilling employment.
Keywords
Job characteristic, Public sector, Sri Lanka, Task performance, Work engagement
Downloads
References
1. Adekiya, A. (2023). Perceived job insecurity and task performance: what aspect of performance is related to which facet of job insecurity. Current Psychology https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adekiya, A.A., Dahiru, I., Aliyu, M.S., & Kofa-Mata, B.A. (2020). Perceived job insecurity and task performance among bank employees in Nigeria Banking Industry: Accounting and Taxation Research journal, Faculty of Management Sciences, Department of Accounting, University of Benin. https://www.atreview.org/admin/12389900798187/ATR%204_2_%2013-32.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adiarani, P.G. (2019). The effects of job characteristics on work engagement. RJOAS, 1(85), DOI 10.18551/rjoas.2019-01.58d. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ali, N., & Zia-Ur-Rehaman, M.Z. (2014) Impact of job design on employee performance, mediating role of job satisfaction A study of FMCG’S sector in Pakistan. International Journal of Business Management, Vol.9, No,23, 2014. Doi: 10:5539/ijbm. v9n2p70 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources Model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M.P. (2010). Work engagement: A Handbook of essential theory and research. M. P. (Eds.). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Borman , W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J.(1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In personal selection in Organizations, Schmitt N, Borman W.C, (eds). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 71-98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational sychology, 11(2), 688–732. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Chu, X. Yu, J, Litifu, A. Zhao, W, Wei, X. Wang, P. & Wei, J. (2024) Organizational support and task performance: a multiple mediation model. Frontiers in Psychol. 14:1258177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Dajani, M.A.Z. (2015). “The Impact of Employee Engagement on Job Performance and Organizational Commitment in the Egyptian Banking Sector.” Journal of Business and Management Sciences, vol. 3, no. 5 (2015): 138-147. doi: 10.12691/jbms-3-5-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Demerouti, E., & Cropanzano, R. (2010). From thought to action: employee work engagement and job performance. In: Bakker, A.B. and Leiter, M.P (Eds) Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Psychology Press, Hove, pp. 147163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., De Jonge, J., Janssen, P. P., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 279-286. DOI:10.12691/jbms-3-5-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Field A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 2nd Ed. SAGE Publications Ltd, London [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hackman, J. R. (1976). Work redesign. In J. R. Hackman & J. L. Shuttle (Eds.). Improving life at work (pp. 96-162). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work design in the organization context. Research in Organizational Behavior, ,2., 247-278. 130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Hosseini, S. (2021). The Causal Relationship between Job Characteristics, Organizational Support, Stress and Performance. Master of Art in Human Kinetics School of Human Kinetics Faculty of Health Sciences University of Ottawa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Johari, J. & Yahya, K.K. (2016),"Job characteristics, work involvement, and job performance of public servants", European Journal of Training and Development, Vol. 40 Issue 7 pp. 554 - 575 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2015-0051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Johari, J., Shamsudin, F.M., Yean, T.F., Yahya, K. K. Adnan, Z. (2019) "Job characteristics, employee well-being, and job performance of public sector employees in Malaysia", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 32 Issue: 1, pp.102-119, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2017-0257 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Kahn, W.A., (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), pp.692-724. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Koopmans, L., Bernards , C.M., Hildebrandt, V.H., Buuren, S. V., Beek, Allard, J., Vet, H.C.D. (2014). Improving the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Journal of Applied Measurement, 15(2), 160-175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Li, Sun. (2019). Employee Engagement: A Literature Review. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 9(1) ISSN 2162-3058 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Madhyvadany, M., & Panboli, S. (2019). Employee Engagement. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT)9(1) ISSN: 2249 – 8958. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. May, D. R., Gilson, R.L., & Harter, L.M. (2004). The Psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and organizational Psychology, 2004 (77), 11-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Motowidlo, S.J., Borman, W.C. and Schmit, M.J. (1997) A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance. Human Performance, 10, 71-83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Mugo, K.F., Wario.G,, Odhiombo, R. (2014). Relationship between job characteristic and employee engagement among state cooperation in Kenya. Internation Journal of innovative research and studies. WWE.ijirs.com.Vol.03issue 05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Mustasa, T. (2016). Assessing job characteristic, job satisfaction and engagement among employees at a local municipality. MBA Tesis, Potchefstroom campus.th West University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). " The Drivers of Employee Engagement", UK: Institute for Employment Studies, IES Report 408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Rotenberry, P.F., & Moberg, P.J. (2007), “Assessing the impact of job involvement on performance”, Management Research News, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 203-215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Sacks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (7), 600 – 619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015), Research methods for Business Students, (7th ed), Person Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Schaufeli, W.B., & Salanova, M. (2013). How to improve work engagement? (In Truss, C., Alfes, K., Delbridge, R., Shantz, A. & Soane, (Eds). Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice. (P. 399 – 415). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Schaufeli, W. & Bakker, A. (2003). UWES Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Preliminary Manual (Version 1). Utrecht University: Occupational Health Psychology Unit. Retrieved from http://www.beanmanaged.eu/pdf/articles [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M, González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A.B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies 3(1):71–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Simpson, M.R. (2009a). Engagement at work: A review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 1012-1024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Dulara. S. (2017). The Role of Job Characteristics, Job Crafting and Work Engagement on Job Performance: A Study on Service Industry." IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR JHSS) 22.7 (2017): 36-42. DOI: 10.9790/0837-2207173642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Williams, L.J. & Anderson, S.E. (1991), “Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 601-617. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Wollard., K.K., & Shuck, B. (2011). Antecedents to Employee Engagement. A Structured Review of the Literature. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(4):429-446, https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422311431220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009a). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational behavior, 74(3), 235-244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Zhao, X., Lynch, Jr.J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar