Enhancing Construction Safety Monitoring Through Yolo-Based Ppe Detection Systems
Authors
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Muhammad Fikri Bin Ahmad Faizal
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1014MG0035
Subject Category: Technology
Volume/Issue: 10/14 | Page No: 426-437
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-05
Accepted: 2026-02-12
Published: 2026-02-22
Abstract
Non-compliance with the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) remains a persistent safety issue during construction project implementation, contributing to a high incidence of site accidents. While prior studies have extensively highlighted the importance of PPE use, enforcement, and monitoring practices on construction sites, these practices continue to rely heavily on manual supervision, which is inconsistent, labour-intensive, and prone to oversight. A critical gap, therefore, exists in the continuous, objective monitoring of individual workers' PPE compliance, particularly in complex, dynamic site environments. This study proposes an artificial intelligence–based PPE monitoring system using the You Only Look Once (YOLO) object detection algorithm to automatically identify the use of safety helmets, safety footwear, and reflective vests on construction sites in Malaysia. The research focuses on evaluating the detection model's performance in terms of accuracy and its ability to provide timely information to personnel responsible for safety supervision. Model performance was assessed through detection accuracy and system responsiveness during controlled testing. The findings indicate that the proposed model can identify PPE non-compliance with a satisfactory level of accuracy, demonstrating its potential as a supplementary tool for site safety monitoring. Although the system does not replace human supervision, it provides a foundation for automated safety inspection and supports proactive safety management. The study contributes to ongoing research on digital safety monitoring and highlights the role of computer vision in strengthening construction site safety practices.
Keywords
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), Construction Safety Management, Artificial Intelligence
Downloads
References
1. Department of Occupational Safety and Health (2023). Guidelines on Occupational Safety and Health in Construction Industry. https://www.dosh.gov.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Guo, H., Yu, Y., & Skitmore, M. (2017). Visualization technology-based construction safety management: A review. Automation in Construction, 73, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.10.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Fang, D., Wu, C., & Wu, H. (2015). Impact of the Supervisor on Worker Safety Behavior in Construction Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(6), 04015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Winge, S., Albrechtsen, E., & Arnesen, J. (2019). A comparative analysis of safety management and safety performance in twelve construction projects. Journal of Safety Research, 71, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chen, F., Wei, Y., Ji, H., & Xu, G. (2024). A multiplex network based analytical framework for safety management standardization in construction engineering. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 59, 102278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Zhou, Z., Goh, Y. M., & Li, Q. (2015). Overview and analysis of safety management studies in the construction industry. Safety Science, 72(1), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.10.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Mohammadi, A., Tavakolan, M., & Khosravi, Y. (2018). Factors influencing safety performance on construction projects: A review. Safety Science, 109(1), 382–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Jalil Al-Bayati, A., Rener, A. T., Listello, M. P., & Mohamed, M. (2023). PPE non-compliance among construction workers: An assessment of contributing factors utilizing fuzzy theory. Journal of Safety Research, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.02.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Lee, J.-K., & Lee, S. (2023). Construction Site Safety Management: A Computer Vision and Deep Learning Approach. 23(2), 944–944. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Badhan, S. J., & Samsami, R. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Construction Safety: A Systematic Literature Review. Buildings, 15(22), 4084. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15224084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Jin, H., & Goodrum, P. M. (2024). Prioritization of Personal Protective Equipment Plans for Construction Projects Based on an Integrated Analytic Network Process and Fuzzy VIKOR Method. Applied Sciences, 14(21), 9904–9904. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219904 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Sonali Pandithawatta, Ahn, S., Raufdeen Rameezdeen, Christopher, & Nima Gorjian. (2024). Systematic Literature Review on Knowledge-Driven Approaches for Construction Safety Analysis and Accident Prevention. Buildings, 14(11), 3403–3403. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Wang, X., Li, H., Yue, X., & Meng, L. (2023). A comprehensive survey on object detection YOLO. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3459/paper5.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Cunha Reis, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence and natural language processing for improved telemedicine: Before, during and after remote consultation. Atención Primaria, 57(8), 103228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2025.103228 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Antony, A., & Xavier, A. S. (2025). Construction Site Incident Reporting Automation Using Natural Language Processing. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management (IRJAEM), 3(04), 1416–1420. https://doi.org/10.47392/IRJAEM.2025.0230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Tianliang, L., Chen, Q., Huang, W., Chen, Q., & Fu Shengjie. (2017). Review of boom potential energy regeneration technology for hydraulic construction machinery. 79, 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Chen, F., Wang, H., Xu, G., Ji, H., Ding, S., & Wei, Y. (2020). Data-driven safety enhancing strategies for risk networks in construction engineering. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 197, 106806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Fang, W., Ding, L., Love, P. E. D., Luo, H., Li, H., Peña-Mora, F., Zhong, B., & Zhou, C. (2020). Computer vision applications in construction safety assurance. Automation in Construction, 110, 103013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Gholizadeh, P., & Esmaeili, B. (2020). Cost of Occupational Incidents for Electrical Contractors: Comparison Using Robust-Factorial Analysis of Variance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(7), 04020073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001861 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Hashizume, K., Rosado, D. G., Fernández-Medina, E., & Fernandez, E. B. (2013). An analysis of security issues for cloud computing. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 4(1), 5. Springeropen. https://doi.org/10.1186/1869-0238-4-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Qin, M., Li, H., An, H., Tong, X., Huang, Y., Dong, S., & Liang, Z. (2025). EFCW-YOLO: A High-Performance Lightweight Model for Automated Wood Surface Defect Detection. Forests, 16(12), 1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16121757 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Oliver, conal. (2025). Violation PPE Dataset. Roboflow. https://universe.roboflow.com/conal-oliver/violation-ppe [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Ibrahim, F. S., Esa, M., & A. Rahman, R. (2021). The Adoption of IOT in the Malaysian Construction Industry: Towards Construction 4.0. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.01.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Alibek Barlybayev, Nurzada Amangeldy, Bekbolat Kurmetbek, Krak, I., Bibigul Razakhova, Nazira Tursynova, & Rakhila Turebayeva. (2024). Personal protective equipment detection using YOLOv8 architecture on object detection benchmark datasets: a comparative study. Cogent Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2024.2333209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- LeafQuest: A Mobile-Based Augmented Reality for Plant Placement, Discovery, and Growth
- Participatory Ergonomic Intervention Approach on Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) in Construction Sectors: A Systematic Review
- Integrating GIS into Traffic Incident Management: A Web-Based System
- RideSmart: A Personalized Motorcycle Product Recommendation System Using TF-IDF and Descriptive Analytics for Javidson Motorshop
- Educational Technology Course Design in Pre-Service Teachers Education: A Bibliometric Review of the Research Landscape