Deviance as an Adaptive Strategy: A Grounded Theory of Ethical Climate and Employee Survival in a Higher Education Institution

Higher education institutions (HEIs) are expected to exemplify ethical conduct and accountability; yet workplace deviance persists even in settings with formal ethical policies. This study examines how ethical climate shapes workplace deviance in a higher education institution, focusing on the personal and organizational motivations that underpin deviant behavior. Guided by Ethical Climate Theory and Organizational Deviance Theory, the study adopts a qualitative grounded theory design following Corbin and Strauss’ approach. Data were generated through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with fifteen academic and non-academic employees from a non-sectarian HEI in Mindanao, Philippines, and analyzed using constant comparative methods. Findings demonstrate that workplace deviance is rarely driven by malicious intent. Rather, deviant behaviors emerge as adaptive, survival-oriented responses to systemic conditions, including job insecurity, fear-based compliance, burnout, weak leadership enforcement, policy–practice gaps, unmet professional needs, and economic strain. Behaviors such as minimal compliance, procedural shortcuts, silence, and withdrawal function as coping strategies that enable employees to manage institutional pressures and sustain employment. Over time, these adaptive responses become normalized through organizational tolerance and inconsistency. The study advances a grounded theory of deviance as an adaptive strategy, reframing workplace deviance as a rational response to ethical and structural vulnerabilities rather than individual moral failure. The findings offer critical implications for ethical governance, leadership accountability, and human resource interventions in higher education.

ethical climate; workplace deviance; grounded theory

1. Aquino, K., Galperin, B. L., & Bennett, R. J. (2004). Social status and aggressiveness as moderators of the relationship between interactional justice and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(5), 1001–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02581.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Biron, M., & Bamberger, P. (2012). Aversive workplace conditions and absenteeism: Taking reference group norms and supervisor support into account. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 901–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027739 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.27895338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). Bullying and harassment in the workplace. CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity. Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 561–568. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1982). Formal and informal social controls of employee deviance. Sociological Quarterly, 23(3), 333–343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pinder, C. C. (2008). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2009). Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 397–422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Shore, L. M., & Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 774–790. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sims, R. R. (1992). The challenge of ethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 505–513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2015). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 447–476. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vardi, Y., & Wiener, Y. (1996). Misbehavior in organizations. Organization Science, 7(2), 151–165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996). Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(2), 145–169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors
• A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
• Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover
• Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation in Davao Region
• Cost of Silence: Exploring the Impact of Organisational Silence on Employee Engagement