Compliance With Grice’s Conversational Maxims by Two Deputy Presidential Candidates During the 2022 Kenyan Deputy Presidential Debate

Language plays a pivotal role in advancing political agenda. There are varied ways through which such agenda are propagated one of them being debate. Debates generally and televised ones specifically, fulfill a valuable democratic function by enabling voters to evaluate potential leaders and their policies. In Kenya, these televised debates have become an integral part of democratic dialogue, determining how citizens judge integrity, governance models and preparedness to rule. This study sought to examine how the deputy presidential candidates adhered to Grice’s conversational maxims during the 2022 Kenyan Deputy Presidential Debate. The intention of this study was to contribute to discourse studies by bringing to the fore how actors in the political arena use language as a tactical tool in momentous electoral communication, and to foster a more profound intellectual grasp of the connection between pragmatics, and ideology in Kenyan political debates. The study was guided by Fairclough’s Dialectical Relational Approach (hereafter DRA) (1992, 2001) and Grice’s (1975) Cooperative Principle. Fairclough’s three-dimensional model was crucial because it provided an in-depth understanding on the structure of the discourse while Grice’s maxims gauged whether the parameters within which conversations should be carried out to ensure effective communication are adhered to. The study adopted a qualitative descriptive design and through purposive sampling excerpts from the debate were selected. The study revealed that candidates adhered to the maxims of Quality, Quantity, Relevance and Manner.

debate, governance, cooperative principle, parameters

1. Benoit, W. L. & Airne, D. (2005), "A Functional Analysis of American Vice-Presidential Debates." Argumentation and Advocacy 41, 225-236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Benoit, W.L., & Hansen, G, J. (2004). Issue Ownership in presidential debates: The role of topics and attacks. Argumentation and Advocacy, 40(3), 143-154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://doi.org/10/1080/00028533.2004.11821696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Capital FM. (2022, July 22). Close to 18 million voters watched Rigathi, Martha debate: MCK. https://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2022/07/close-to-18mn-voters-watched-rigathi-martha-debate-mck [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Citizen Digital. (2022, July 19). DP Ruto congratulates Rigathi Gachagua after deputy presidential debate. https://www.citizen.digital/news/dp-ruto-congratulates-rigathi-gachagua-after-deputy-presidentialdebate-n302454 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Coleman, S. & Moss, G. (2014). Rethinking Election Debates: What Citizens are Entitled to Expect (2014). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Sage [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Du, N.T. & Linh, D.K. (2024). An Analysis of the Presidential Live Debates between Donald Trump and Joe Biden: A Case Study of Grice’s Cooperative Principle. TNU Journal of Science and Technology 229(08): 416 – 424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Harlow: Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. Van (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 2, 258-284. Sage, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Justice, J.W.; Slaw, T. P. & Koch, J. (2024) "Looking to the Past and Abroad to Enhance U.S. Presidential Debates," Studies in Debate and Oratory: Vol. 1(1), 1-33. Available at: https://scholar.stjohns.edu/sido/vol1/iss1/1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Isotalus, P. (2011). Analyzing Presidential Debates: Functional Theory and Finnish Political Communication Culture. Nordicom Review 32 (1), 31-43 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Laninhun, B.A. & Olowojebutu, A.E (2021). Voters’ Reactions to the 2019 Presidential Debate in Nigeria. Journal of Communication and Language Arts (JCLA), vol 12 (1),11-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Masiolo, J. (2023). Playing with Words: Analyzing Political Agenda and Discourse in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania during Electioneering and Referendum. International Journal of Literature and Languages Volume 3(8), 9-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Michira, J. N. (2014). The Language of Politics: A CDA of the 2013 Kenyan Presidential Campaign Discourse. International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 2 (1), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Muhammed, M.M & Flaifel, M.S. (2013). A Critical Discourse Analysis of the 2012 American Presidential Election Debates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mwakilishi.com. (2022, July 20). Deputy Presidential Debate: Ruto and Raila praise their running mates’ performance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. https://www.mwakilishi.com/article/kenya-news/2022-07-20/deputy-presidential-debateruto-and-raila-praise-their-running-mates [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ndonye, M.M. & Ogola, J.O. (2015). Mediatised Governance: Analysis of the 2013 Presidential Debate in Kenya. Scholars Journal of Arts and Humanities. Soc. Sci. 2015; 3(4B),915-922 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. O'Hare, A. & Moss, N. (2014) Staging democracy: Kenya's televised presidential debates. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 8:1, 78-92, DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2013.869929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tuko.co.ke. (2022, July 20). Raila Odinga celebrates Martha Karua’s performance at deputy presidential debate: “impressive”. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Tuko.co.ke. (2022, July 22). 34 million Kenyans watched deputy presidential debate, MCK report shows. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. https://www.tuko.co.ke/politics/464163-34-million-kenyans-watched-deputy-presidential-debate-mckreport-shows [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being