Spatially Informed Estimation of Child Multidimensional Poverty at Local Government Area Level in Nigeria: A SAE-Inspired Regression Approach Using Mics 2021 And Worldpop 2020 Data

Authors

Adeyemo, S.O

Department of Statistics, Federal Polytechnic, Nekede, Owerri, Imo State (Nigeria)

Ofomata, A.I.O.

Department of Statistics, Federal Polytechnic, Nekede, Owerri, Imo State (Nigeria)

Duruojinkeya, P.

Department of Statistics, Federal Polytechnic, Nekede, Owerri, Imo State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200077

Subject Category: Demography

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 1048-1063

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-16

Accepted: 2026-01-22

Published: 2026-02-24

Abstract

This study produces Local Government Area (LGA) level estimates of child multidimensional poverty in Nigeria by integrating the 2021 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) with high-resolution WorldPop 2020 population density grids and conflict event data from ACLED. Using the Alkire-Foster framework, the national child Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) is estimated at 0.292, corresponding to a headcount ratio of 56% and an average intensity of 42.2%. This implies that approximately 55.7 million of Nigeria’s 99.6 million children experience deprivations in at least three indicators spanning education, health, and living standards. The MICS-derived estimate is conservative relative to official 2022 NBS/UNICEF/OPHI benchmarks (67.5% child headcount under the National MPI for ages 0–17; 83.5% for under-5s under the linked Child MPI), reflecting differences in survey design, indicator specifications, weighting procedures, and sampling adjustments. Because reliable direct MPI sampling variances are not available at the LGA level from public MICS outputs, the study adopts an SAE-inspired predictive framework. State-level MPI patterns are modelled as a function of logtransformed population density and conflict intensity, improving explanatory power to 75%. A pilot Fay-Herriot model is additionally fitted at the state level to illustrate hierarchical smoothing under approximate variance inputs. Geospatial processing aggregates auxiliary covariates to official LGA boundaries using GIS. Predicted LGA MPI values range from 0 to 0.569, with negative linear predictions constrained to 0 to respect the theoretical bounds of MPI. Model-based reliability assessment using coefficients of variation indicates that 651 of 774 LGAs (84%) have CV values below 15%. Results reveal strong north-south disparities, with the highest predicted burdens concentrated in northern zones. While the estimates remain exploratory and sensitive to omitted covariates, the study provides a transparent foundation for geographically targeted child poverty interventions and for future refinement through Bayesian SAE and expanded geospatial predictors

Keywords

Child Multidimensional Poverty, SAE-Inspired Modeling, Population Density Modelling

Downloads

References

1. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 476-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alkire, S., Kanagaratnam, U., & Suppa, N. (2022). The global multidimensional poverty index 2022. Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative. https://ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/G-MPI_2022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Elbers, C., Lanjouw, J. O., & Lanjouw, P. (2003). Micro-level estimation of poverty and inequality. Econometrica, 71(1), 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Federal Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs, Disaster Management and Social Development. (2021). National Social Investment Programme: Conditional Cash Transfer. https://fmhds.gov.ng [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Molina, I., & Rao, J. N. K. (2010). Small area estimation of poverty indicators. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 38(3), 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjs.10064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2022). Demographic Statistics Bulletin 2022. https://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. NBS & UNICEF. (2022a). Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2021, Nigeria. https://mics.unicef.org/surveys [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. NBS & UNICEF. (2022b). Nigeria Multidimensional Poverty Index 2022: First Order National Estimates. https://www.unicef.org/nigeria/reports/nigeria-mpi-2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. National Population Commission (NPC). (2017). Nigeria’s Population 2006-2016. https://nationalpopulation.gov.ng [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rao, J. N. K., & Molina, I. (2015). Small Area Estimation. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118735855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ravallion, M. (2012). Poverty lines across the world. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5284. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/3399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Stevens, F. R., Gaughan, A. E., Linard, C., & Tatem, A. J. (2015). Disaggregating census data for population mapping using random forests with remotely-sensed and ancillary data. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0107042. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Tatem, A. J. (2017). WorldPop, open data for spatial demography. Scientific Data, 4, 170004. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.4 UNICEF. (2022). MICS Data Repository. https://mics.unicef.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles