Factors Influencing Willingness to Purchase Electric Bicycles among Malaysian Private University Students

Electric bicycles have emerged as a promising sustainable mobility option capable of reducing emissions, alleviating traffic congestion, and promoting healthier transportation choices. However, purchase remains uneven among young adults, and the determinants influencing their purchase intentions are not well established. This study investigates regional differences and key predictors of electric bicycles purchase willingness among students in Malaysian private universities. Quantitative research design was employed using an online survey, comprising a pilot study (n = 10) and a main study (n = 162). Data analysis included reliability assessment, frequency distribution, and correlation testing. The findings reveal no significant regional variation in students’ willingness to purchase electric bicycles. Instead, purchase intentions were positively associated with familiarity with electric bicycles, knowledge of their benefits, affordability, and the availability of charging infrastructure. Demographic and social factors including gender, age, environmental concern, lifestyle, and peer influence did not exhibit significant relationships with purchase intention. These results underscore that practical and structural considerations, rather than demographic attributes, play a more decisive role in shaping students’ purchasing behaviour. The study highlights opportunities for Malaysian private universities to promote sustainable mobility by reducing cost barriers, enhancing infrastructure, and increasing awareness of electric bicycle’s functionality and maintenance. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and educational institutions seeking to advance sustainable transportation initiatives among young adult populations.

Electric bicycles; sustainable mobility; willingness to purchase; affordability; charging infrastructure

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. BCC Research. (2024). Global e bike market anticipated to surge to $77.6 billion by 2028. https://www.bccresearch.com/pressroom/fcb/global-e-bike-market-anticipated-to-surge-to-776-billion-by-2028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Campbell, A. A., Cherry, C. R., Ryerson, M. S., & Yang, X. (2016). Factors influencing the choice of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Beijing. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.03.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, H., Zhang, Y., & Wang, J. (2025). Promoting sustainable mobility on campus: Students’ perceptions of e-bike sharing. Sustainability, 17(15), 7147. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cherry, C., & Cervero, R. (2007). Use characteristics and mode choice behavior of electric bike users in China. Transport Policy, 14(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.02.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cherry, C., Yang, H., Jones, L. R., & He, M. (2009). Dynamics of electric bike ownership and use in China. Transport Policy, 16(6), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dill, J., & Rose, G. (2012). Electric bikes and transportation policy: Insights from early purchaseers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2314(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3141/2314-01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fishman, E., & Cherry, C. (2016). Electric bicycles in the mainstream: Reviewing a decade of research. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069907 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Goodland, R. (1995). The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Grand View Research. (2024). APAC electric bicycles market size and share: Industry report, 2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/asia-pacific-electric bicycles-market-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Haustein, S., & Møller, M. (2016). E-bike safety: Individual-level factors and incident characteristics. Journal of Transport & Health, 3(3), 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.07.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hawkins, T. R., Singh, B., Majeau-Bettez, G., & Strømman, A. H. (2013). Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Huang, Y., Jiang, L., Chen, H., Dave, K., & Parry, T. (2022). Comparative life cycle assessment of electric bikes for commuting in the UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. (Preprint/Institutional repository copy). https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/184093/ (PDF) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ibrahim, A. N. H., Borhan, M. N., Darus, N. S., Mhd Yunin, N. A., & Ismail, R. (2022). Understanding the willingness of students to use bicycles for sustainable commuting in a university setting: A structural equation modelling approach. Mathematics, 10(6), 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10060861 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. ITDP (Institute for Transportation and Development Policy). (2024). Why we need electric bicycles as a climate and mobility solution. https://www.itdp.org/why-we-need-electric bicycles/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. MacArthur, J., Dill, J., & Person, M. (2014). Electric bikes in North America: Results of an online survey. Transportation Research Record, 2468(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.3141/2468-14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. McEachan, R., Taylor, N., Harrison, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P., & Conner, M. (2016). Meta-analysis of the reasoned action approach (RAA) to understanding health behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(4), 592–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9798-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. McQueen, M., MacArthur, J., & Cherry, C. (2019). The e-bike potential: Estimating the effect of electric bicycles on person-miles travelled and greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. (preprint details cited in LCA literature) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: Legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research, 8(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510619733 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sierra, J., & Suárez-Collado, Á. (2021). Understanding Economic, Social, and Environmental Sustainability Challenges in the Global South. Sustainability, 13(13), 7201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Simons, D., Clarys, P., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., de Geus, B., Vandelanotte, C., & Deforche, B. (2019). Why do young adults choose electric bicycles? A focus group study. Transport Policy, 81, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.06.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tee, M., Al Mamun, A., & Salameh, A. A. (2023). Modelling the mass purchaseion potentials of electric bicycles among Malaysian youth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(42), 95475–95492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29831-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Weinert, J., Ma, C., & Cherry, C. (2007). The transition to electric bikes in China: History and key reasons for rapid growth. Transportation, 34(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9118-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Weinert, J., Ogden, J., Sperling, D., & Burke, A. (2008). The future of electric two-wheelers and electric vehicles in China. Energy Policy, 36(7), 2544–2555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Weiss, M., Dekker, P., Moro, A., Scholz, H., & Patel, M. K. (2015). On the electrification of road transportation – A review of the environmental, economic, and social performance of electric two-wheelers. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 41, 348-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yasir, A., Hu, X., & Ahmad, M. (2025). Factors affecting electric bike purchaseion: Seeking an energy-efficient solution for the post-COVID era. Frontiers in Energy Research, 13, 1172330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2025.1172330 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhang, X., Lim, E. S., & Chen, M. (2024). Promoting sustainable urban mobility: Factors influencing e-bike purchaseion in Henan Province, China. Sustainability, 16(22), 10136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar