School Head’s Instructional Leadership Practices in Public Schools

This mixed methods study examined the instructional leadership practices of public elementary school heads in Talakag I District, Division of Bukidnon. Anchored on the National Competency-Based Standards for School Heads and the theory of deliberate practice, it assessed the extent to which school heads performed four competency strands assessment for learning, program development and adaptation, implementation of programs for instructional improvement, and instructional supervision identified the difficulties they encountered, and described how they addressed these challenges. Fifteen school heads from 17 public elementary schools participated through a survey using the DepEd instructional leadership evaluation instrument and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using mean and standard deviation, while qualitative data underwent thematic narrative analysis. Findings revealed very high levels of instructional leadership across all strands, with overall means from 4.25 to 4.53 “Always Practiced”, indicating consistent use of assessment data, curriculum review, program implementation, and clinical supervision with feedback and technical assistance. Despite this, school heads reported challenges such as teacher resistance to change, competing administrative demands, limited time for classroom observation, and difficulties sustaining innovation. To overcome these, they maximized Learning Action Cells and other professional development activities, strengthened collegial supervision and mentoring, encouraged collaboration among teachers, and modeled openness to change. The study concludes that while instructional leadership is generally strong, targeted support is still needed to help school heads manage workload, deepen teacher buy-in, and sustain instructional improvements.

instructional leadership, school heads, professional development

1. Alemayehu, G.O. (2018). The current practices and problems of subject-area instructional supervision in secondary schools of Addis. Ababa city administration. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Ateeqi, A. (2019). We have come along the way: Redefining education and its global challenges in the United Arab Emirates. Paper presented at the 2009 Education without Borders Conference. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arong, F. E. & Ogbadu, M. A. (2022). Major causes of declining quality of education in Nigeria from administrative perspective: A case study of Dekina local government area. Canadian Social Science, 6(3), 183-198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Busher. H. (2020). Understanding Educational Leadership: People, Power & Culture. Open University [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Congcong, G. J. D., & Caingcoy, M. E. (2020). Feedback Mechanisms of School Heads on Teacher Performance. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(3), 236-253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education (2016). DepEd Order 35, series of 2016: The policy on the Learning Action Cell (LAC) as the Kto12 Basic Education Program School–Based Strategy. DepEd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education. (2012). National Competency-based Standards for School Heads Training and Development Needs Assessment: Guide and Tools. Philippines: DepEd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Desta, D., Chalchisa, C., & Lemma, G. (2018). School-Based Continuous Teacher Professional Development: An Investigation of Practices, Opportunities and Challenges. Addis Ababa University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dexter, S. (2021). School Technology Leadership: Artifacts in Systems of Practice. Journal of School Leadership, 21(2):166-189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ericsson, K. A., & Harwell, K. W. (2019). Deliberate Practice and Proposed Limits on the Effects of Practice on the Acquisition of Expert Performance: Why the Original Definition Matters and Recommendations for Future Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10 (2396), 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fullan, M. (2020). All Systems Go: The Change Imperative for Whole System Reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2014). Supervision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach (9th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gu, S. L. (2014). The Relationships Between Instructional Leadership Behavior, School Climate and Teacher Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Kedah. Northern University of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Guskey, T. R. (2020). Closing The Achievement Gap: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom's learning for mastery. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 8–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hallinger, P.& Heck, R. H. (2015). Collaborative Leadership & School Improvement: Understanding The Impact on School Capacity and Student Learning. School Leadership and Management, 30 (20), 95-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hallinger, P. (2019). A Review of Three Decades of Doctoral Studies Using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A Lens on Methodological Progress in Educational Leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 271-306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hoadley, U., Christie, P., Jacklin, H., & Ward, C. (2017). Managing to Learn- Instructional Leadership in South African Secondary Schools. Cape Town: University of Cape Town. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Horng, E. L., Klasik, D., & Loeb, S. (2020). Principal’s Time Use and School Effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116 (4), 491-523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ibrahim, M.Y. (2017). Literature Review on Instructional Leadership Practice among Principals in Managing Changes. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science, 7(12), 18-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jita, L. C. (2020). Instructional Leadership for the Improvement of Science and Mathematics in South Africa. Procodia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, (9)2, 851–854.doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2020). Identifying Effective Classroom Practices using Student Achievement Data. NBER Working Paper Series. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kelley, C., & Peterson, K. D. (2017). The Work of Principals and their Preparation: Addressing Critical Needs for the Twenty-First Century. In M Fullan (ed). The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (2nd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lobo, I. D., (2016). Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Collective Action: A case study from the Colombian Pacific Region. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 982–1012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2020). How Does Leadership Affect Student Achievement? Results from a national US Survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315-336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. MacBeath, J., & Cheng, Y.C. (2018), Leadership for Learning: International Perspectives. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Malakolunthu, S., & Hoon, S. K. (2021). Teachers Perspectives of School Based Assessment In A Secondary School. St. Mary Secondary School, 52100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. May, H., Huff, J., & Goldring, E. (2022). A Longitudinal Study of Principals’ Activities and Student Performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 417–439. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Michalopoulos, L., Ahn, H., Shaw, T. V., & O’Connor, J. (2020). Child Welfare Worker Perception of the Implementation of Family-Centered Practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(6), 656–664. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Murchan, D., Tohasa, J., Loxley, A., & Johnston, K. (2019). Teacher Learning and Policy Intention: Selected Findings from an Evaluation of a Large-Scale Programme of Professional Development in the Republic of Ireland. European Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nolan, J. F. & Hoover, L. A. (2018). Teacher Supervision and Evaluation: Theory Into practice (2nd Edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. O’Connor, K. (2013). Characteristics of Effective and Engaging Secondary Social Studies Instruction in an Era of Rising Accountability for Teachers and Students. A Thesis in Master of Arts in Education at Northern Michigan University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Omebe, C. A. (2023). Human Resource Management in Education: Issues and Challenges. British Journal of Education, 2, 26-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Opfer, V.D., Pedder, D.G. and Lavicza, Z. (2021), “The Role of Teachers’ Orientation to Learning in Professional Development and Change: A National Study of Teachers in England”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 443-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Orr, T. M., & Orphanos, S. (2019). How Graduate-Level Preparation Influences the Effectiveness of School Leaders: A Comparison of the Outcomes of Exemplary and Conventional Leadership Preparation Programs for Principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(18), 18–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Papa, R. (2021). Technology Leadership for School Improvement. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Philippine Congress. (2011). Republic Act No. 9155 or Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001.Republic of the Philippines: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Philippine Congress. (2013). Republic Act No. 10533, s. 2013, or the Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. Philippine Congress. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Ponnusamy, P. (2018). The Relationship of Instructional Leadership, Teachers’ Organizational Commitment and Students’ Achievement in Small Schools. Unpublished Masters Project. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Pustejovsky, J., Spillane, J.P., Heaton, R.M., & Lewis, W. J. (2019). Understanding Teacher Leadership in Middle School Mathematics: A Collaborative Research Effort. Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, 11(2),19–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Radi, A. (2017) Prediction of Non-Linear System in Optics Using Genetic Programming. Int J Mod Phys C 1(8)369-374. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Riesman, C. K. (2018). Concluding Comments. In Andrews, M., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (Eds.). (2008). Doing Narrative Research. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Sahlberg, P. (2019). Educational Change in Finland. In A. Hargreaves, M. Fullan, A.Lieberman, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Sammons, P., Davies, S., Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Using Mixed Methods to Investigate School Improvement and the Role of Leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 52 (5), 565-589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Thomas, T. (2018). Fixing Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Educational Leadership, 66(2), 32-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Thompson, P. (2013). The Digital Natives as Learners: Technology Use Patterns and Approaches to Learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Too, C. Kimutai, C. K & Kosgei, Z. (2022). The Impact of Head Teachers’ Supervision of Teachers on Students’ Academic Performance. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 3(3), 299-306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2010). The Effect of Charismatic Leadership in the Relationship Between Procedural Justice and Feedback Reactions in Teacher Evaluation. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Tuytens, M., Devos, G. (2011) Stimulating Professional Learning through Teacher Evaluation: An Impossible Task for the School Leader? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 891-899. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Tyagi, R.S. (2020). School-Based Instructional Supervision and the Effective Professional Development of Teachers. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, Special Issue: Globalization, Educational Governance and Decentralisation, 40(1), 111-125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. UNESCO (2014). Teaching and Learning: Achieving Quality for All. EFA Global Monitoring Report 2013/14. UNESCO, Paris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Yunas, M., & Iqbal, M. (2013). Dimensions of Instructional Leadership Role of Principal. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(10), 629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Zepeda, S. J. (2017). Cognitive Dissonance, Supervision, and Administrative Team Conflict. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(3), 224-232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar