Green Finance and Environmental Sustainability in the West African Monetary Zone (WAMZ)

Authors

Edobot Udo Ekere

Department of Economics, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

Sancho Nwobuisi Chukwu

Department of Economics, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200098

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 1318-1326

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-31

Accepted: 2026-01-06

Published: 2026-02-25

Abstract

This study provides empirical evidence on how different forms of green finance affect environmental sustainability in the West African Monetary Zone (WAMZ), comprising Nigeria, Ghana, The Gambia, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea. The specific objectives are to determine the effects of international finance for clean energy, total donations for biodiversity conservation, international financial support for green infrastructure, and technical cooperation grants on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. This study relied on panel datasets gathered from the Global Carbon Budget, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the United Nations, and analysed using descriptive statistics, a panel unit root test, and a random-effects static regression. The findings showed that international funding for clean energy has a negative impact on annual CO2 emissions. Although this result is not significant at the 5% level, it suggests that funds from donor agencies for clean energy could reduce CO2 emissions across WAMZ member countries. Similarly, the results showed that total donations directed towards biodiversity conservation significantly reduced annual CO₂ emissions in the WAMZ during the study period. This suggests that donor-funded projects, such as reforestation, habitat restoration, protected area management, and anti-deforestation efforts, are delivering meaningful environmental benefits in the WAMZ. Additionally, the results showed that international financial support for infrastructure and technical cooperation grants positively and significantly affected annual CO2 emissions. This finding indicates that these funding sources have not translated into environmental sustainability, which may be linked to poor institutional quality, managerial inefficiency, and a limited focus on low-carbon technologies in the funds' investments. Given the findings, it is recommended, among others, that policymakers in the WAMZ should strengthen project appraisal frameworks and prioritise high-impact renewable energy initiatives to ensure clean energy financing is effectively utilised and results in significant CO2 emission reductions. It is also recommended that governments in the WAMZ enhance their institutional frameworks for conservation management to secure increased funding through international grants and climate funds dedicated to environmental sustainability in the region.

Keywords

Green finance, environmental sustainability, international finance, biodiversity conservation, green infrastructure CO2 emissions and WAMZ

Downloads

References

1. Asif, M., Yunrong, L., Zia, M. A., Hashim, M., Bhatti, U. A., Bhatti, M. A., & Hasnain, A. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of green finance mechanisms, digitalization, globalization, and renewable energy consumption in advancing environmental sustainability in G20 countries. Energy & Environment, 0958305X251319367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Balestra, P., & Nerlove, M. (1966). Pooling cross-section and time series data in the estimation of a dynamic model: The demand for natural gas. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 34(3), 585-612. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Çıtak, F., & Hoş, S. (2024). The Granger-Causality between Green Finance and Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from G7 Countries. Karadeniz Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 50-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fu, C., Lu, L., & Pirabi, M. (2023). Advancing green finance: a review of sustainable development. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Khan, H. H. A., Ahmad, N., Yusof, N. M., & Chowdhury, M. A. M. (2024). Green finance and environmental sustainability: a systematic review and future research avenues. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(6), 9784-9794. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Li, Z., & Song, Z. (2025). Green finance reform and innovation pilot zones: A catalyst for green development efficiency in Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 525, 146576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lwesya, F. (2025). Green finance in Africa: Mapping progress, challenges and prospects. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Marashdeh, Z., & Khataybeh, M. (2025). Green finance and financial development in delivering environmental sustainability among the Gulf countries. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Monasterolo, I. (2020). Climate change and the financial system. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 299-320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mudalige, H. M. N. K. (2023). Emerging new themes in green finance: a systematic literature review. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross-sectional data. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 69-85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Oates, W. E. (1995). Green taxes: Can we protect the environment and improve the tax system at the same time?. Southern Economic Journal, 915-922. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2022). Dissecting green returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 146(2), 403-424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pasupuleti, A., & Ayyagari, L. R. (2023). A thematic study of green finance with special reference to polluting companies: a review and future direction. Environmental Processes, 10(2), 24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pearce, D. (1991). The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. The Economic Journal, 101(407), 938-948. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023). Green finance, fintech, and environmental sustainability: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. fresh policy insights from the BRICS nations. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(6), 633-649. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wu, G., Liu, X., & Cai, Y. (2024). The impact of green finance on carbon emission efficiency. Heliyon, 10(1), e23803. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zhang, X., & Xi, Y. (2024). Green finance, private investments and fossil fuels rents. Resources Policy, 99, 105415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zhou, W., Wu, X., & Zhou, D. (2023). Does green finance reduce environmental pollution?—A study based on China’s provincial panel data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(59), 123862123881. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles