The Birth of Professional Accounting Organizations and their Influence on the Transformation of Accounting Practices

The accounting profession is essential to globalized economies as it provides the bedrock of transparency, trust, and reliable financial information necessary for efficient resource allocation, international investment, and sustainable economic growth. The transformation in accounting is vital to modern globalized economies because it enhances transparency, efficiency, and data-driven decision-making, which are essential for attracting international investment, facilitating cross-border trade, and ensuring financial stability. This evolution is driven largely by technological advancements and the need for standardized global practices. The transformation of accounting from a trade into a codified, principles-based profession is widely attributed to the emergence of Professional Accounting Organizations (PAOs). Despite the acknowledged historical importance of these Professional Accounting Organizations, a significant gap exists based on empirical facts that established the specific causal mechanisms through which these institutions directly shaped and accelerated the modernization of accounting practices. This qualitative study and content analysis investigated the influence of PAO institutionalization on the modernization of accounting practices across four strategically selected countries: the United Kingdom, the United States, France, and Nigeria.A comparative multiple-case study design was employed, using purposive sampling to ensure theoretical variation in PAO formation models. Data collected exclusively through qualitative archival analysis, including foundational charters, technical pronouncements, ethical codes, educational syllabi, and professional journals from each country’s formative period (c. 1880-1980). Data analysis involved within-case process tracing and cross-case pattern matching to identify causal mechanisms. The study found PAOs were not passive respondents to market needs but active institutional entrepreneurs shaping the profession's trajectory. As the analysis revealed three consistent, context-adapted mechanisms of PAO influence: Legitimacy Construction (all cases), where PAOs leveraged state partnerships (UK, France, Nigeria) or market authority (US) to codify practices; Cognitive Control (all cases), achieved through the standardization of education and examinations, most decisively observed in Nigeria’s ICAN post-1965; and Strategic Mimicry (notably in Nigeria and France), where PAOs selectively adopted and adapted Anglo-American models to suit local legal and economic contexts. The Nigerian case uniquely highlighted how a transplanted PAO functioned as the primary driver of practice homogenization in a post-colonial economy. The study concluded that PAOs were not merely reflections of market needs but were active institutional entrepreneurs whose influence are validated by national context. The transformation of accounting practices was significantly accelerated by the deliberate, strategic interventions of these bodies. It is recommended that contemporary accounting policymakers recognize the enduring importance of context-sensitive PAO capacity building, especially in emerging economies, and that global standard-setters actively support the development of PAOs as critical infrastructure for high-quality financial reporting. Also, National governments, particularly in developing nations, should prioritize the legal and operational strengthening of their national PAOs as key institutions of economic governance.

Professional accounting organizations, Accounting history, Institutional theory, Professionalization, Standard setting, ICAEW, AICPA, ICAN

1. Agyei-Boapeah, H., Machokoto, M., & Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2023). Do strong accounting professions improve financial reporting quality? International evidence. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 34(2), 245–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Albu, C. N., Albu, N., & Alexander, D. (2023). Professional accounting bodies and the legitimation of sustainability reporting: A comparative institutional analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(5), 1315–1345. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2022-6021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Annisette, M., Senyel, M., & Bakre, O. (2023). Networked professionalization: The role of post-colonial accounting associations in diffusing global standards. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 91, 102–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Capoccia, G., & Ziblatt, D. (2024). Critical junctures and institutional layering in professional fields: A historical-institutional framework. Journal of Historical Sociology, 37(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Caramanis, C. V. (2002). The interplay between professional groups, the state and supranational agents: Pax Americana in the age of ‘globalisation.’ Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(4-5), 379–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00007-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Carey, J. L. (1969). The rise of the accounting profession: From technician to professional, 1896-1936. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Carnegie, G. D., & Napier, C. J. (2022). Accounting history and theorising about the profession. Accounting History, 27(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732211065038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chandler, R. A., & Edwards, J. R. (1996). Recurring issues in auditing: Back to the future? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(2), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579610116282 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Edwards, J. R. (2019). A history of financial accounting. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hwang, H., & Colyvas, J. A. (2024). Institutional choreography: How actors’ sequence and combine institutional strategies for legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 49(2), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Guénin-Paracini, H., & Gendron, Y. (2010). Auditors as modern pharmakoi: Legitimacy and the construction of audit governance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(6), 550–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.05.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B., & Zilber, T. B. (2023). Institutional work in professional organizations: A typology and research agenda. Organization Studies, 44(8), 1195–1223. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221122971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Leoni, G., & Preda, A. (2024). Professional bodies and the future of auditing: Blockchain, AI, and institutional adaptation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 43(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2023-038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mamman, A., Azizan, N., & Akobo, L. A. (2023). Institutional translation in post-colonial contexts: Theory and evidence from professional associations. Journal of Management Studies, 60(5), 1123–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Möller, K., Schäffer, U., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2023). Digitalization and the transformation of accounting work: The mediating role of professional accounting organizations. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 19(3), 398–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-12-2022-0195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Okafor, C. A., & Ihendinihu, J. U. (2024). Regulatory turf wars and professional sovereignty: The case of the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 14(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2023-0081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Parker, L. D. (1994). Professional accounting body ethics: In search of the private interest. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(6), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90024-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Parker, R. H. (1986). The development of the accountancy profession in Britain to the early twentieth century. Academy of Accounting Historians. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Power, M. K. (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00047-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Previts, G. J., & Merino, B. D. (1998). A history of accountancy in the United States: The cultural significance of accounting (2nd ed.). Ohio State University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ramirez, C. (2009). Constructing the governable small practitioner: The changing nature of professional bodies and the management of professional accountants’ identities in the UK. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4), 381–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.09.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ramirez, C., & Rüling, C. C. (2023). The globalization of accounting standards: The role of transnational professional associations in institutional isomorphism. Organization Studies, 44(8), 1225–1250. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221122973 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Steinmo, S. (2008). Historical institutionalism. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches, and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective (pp. 118-138). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Suddaby, R., Gendron, Y., & Lam, H. (2009). The organizational context of professionalism in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Suddaby, R., Viale, T., & Gendron, Y. (2024). Professional projects and institutional work: Re-theorizing the relationship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 108, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Uche, C. U., & Adegbite, E. (2024). Post-colonial transplants and professional sovereignty: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN) as an institutional entrepreneur, 1965–2020. Accounting History, 29(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732231215827 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Willmott, H. (1986). Organising the profession: A theoretical and historical examination of the development of the major accountancy bodies in the U.K. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(6), 555–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(86)90030-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zambon, S., & Orij, R. P. (2022). The European Union and the professionalization of accounting: A comparative study of institutional work in France, Germany, and Italy. European Accounting Review, 31(4), 917–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2052847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zeff, S. A. (2003). How the U.S. accounting profession got where it is today: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors