Strengthening Legal Protection Against Online Child Sexual Grooming in Malaysia: A Comparative Legal and Maqasid Al-Shariah Analysis

In recent years, online child sexual grooming and exploitation have emerged as critical global concerns, driven by the rapid expansion of digital communication technologies and increased internet accessibility among children. In Malaysia, the rising number of reported cases highlights growing vulnerabilities faced by children in digital environments. This article examines the adequacy of the existing legal framework governing online child sexual grooming in Malaysia through comparative analysis with selected jurisdictions, namely the United Kingdom and Singapore. The study further evaluates the Malaysian legal framework using the normative principles of Maqasid al-Shariah, particularly the protection of life, intellect, dignity, and lineage. This study adopts a qualitative legal research methodology based on doctrinal legal analysis, comparative legal analysis, and normative evaluation. Data were collected from primary and secondary sources, including statutory provisions, case law, academic literature, policy documents, and institutional reports. The data were analysed using content analysis, comparative legal analysis, and descriptive analytical methods to identify regulatory strengths, structural gaps, and areas requiring legal reform across the examined jurisdictions. The findings indicate that while Malaysia has established an important legislative foundation through the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and related laws, existing provisions remain insufficiently comprehensive in addressing early-stage online grooming behaviour, particularly where explicit intent to commit a specific sexual offence is difficult to establish. In contrast, jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom and Singapore demonstrate stronger preventive legal approaches by criminalising sexual communication and grooming behaviour at earlier stages of interaction. From a Maqasid al-Shariah perspective, effective child protection requires not only punitive measures but also preventive legal mechanisms that safeguard children’s dignity, psychological wellbeing, and long-term societal interests. This article proposes strengthening Malaysia’s legal framework through clearer criminalisation of online sexual grooming as a standalone offence, enhancement of digital evidence frameworks, and the development of child-centred digital protection policies. Integrating contemporary legal mechanisms with Maqasid al-Shariah principles is essential to ensure holistic, sustainable, and culturally grounded protection of children in Malaysia’s digital ecosystem.

Legal Protection; Online Sexual Grooming; Child Sexual Exploitation; Children’s Rights; Digital Child Protection; Maqasid al-Shariah

1. Al-Suyuti. (1968). Al-asybah wa al-nazair fi qawaid wa furu’ fiqh al-Shafi’iyyah. Cairo: Mua’assah alHalabi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Syarbini. (2000). Mughni al-muhtaj. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Syaukani. (2002). Fath al-qadr. Beirut: ‘Alim al-Kutub. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asmi Asmidar Zainal Rashid, Mohammad Rahim Kamaluddin, Suzaily WahabAbdul Aziz, Zarina Abdul Latiff & Balan Rathakrishnan. (2018). Kerentanan Kanak-kanak Malaysia terhadap Pengantunan Seksual Dalam Talian. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 32(3), 91-108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Child Act 2001 (Act 611). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 (Act 792). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bahori, A., Mat Rashid, A., Yahya, M. A., Saifuddin, S., & Mat Salleh, M. K. (2023). Evidence and prosecution of out-of-wedlock pregnancies: A legal perspective of Syariah criminal offences in Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 14(1), 1-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bernama. (2024, April 10). Rogol Bawah Umur Meningkat, Bermula dari Pengantunan. Bernama Online. https://www.bernama.com/bm/news.php?id=2287200 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Craven, S., Brown, S., & Gilchrist, E. (2007). Current responses to sexual grooming: Implication for prevention. The Howard Journal, 46(1), 60-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. ECPAT, INTERPOL dan UNICEF. (2022). Disrupting Harm di Malaysia: Bukti mengenai eksploitasi dan penderaan seksual kanak-kanak dalam talian Children. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Guidance on part 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (accessible version). (2023, March 31). GOV.UK. Retrieved October 5, 2024, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-on-part-2-of-thesexual-offences-act-2003/guidance-on-part-2-of-the-sexual-offences-act-2003-accessible-version [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hasimi Muhamad. (2023, March 8). 5,350 jadi mangsa jenayah seksual kanak-kanak antara 2017-2022. Astro Awani. https://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/5350-jadi-mangsa-jenayah-seksualkanakkanak-antara-20172022-azalina-409806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2023, November 1). Children statistics Malaysia 2023. https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/children-statistics-malaysia-2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khairul Nur Afiqah Khairul Ariffin. (2024). Child Grooming: A Rising Epidemic In Malaysia. Kevin Wu & Associates. https://www.kevinwuassociates.com/post/child-grooming-a-rising-epidemic-in-malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lewis, L. (2020). Experience in online grooming from initial contact with offender to relationship-ending. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, Walden University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Malin Joleby, Carolina Lunde, Sara Landstrom & Linda S. Jonsson. (2021). Offender Strategies For Engaging Children in Online Sexual Activity. Child Abuse & Neglect the International Journal, 120, 115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mohan, S. Chandra & Lee, Yingqi. (2020). Sexual grooming as an offence in Singapore. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 32, 96-123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nur Hafiza Ahmad & Salina Sen. (2021). Pengaruh Faktor Psikologikal Terhadap Kerentanan Pengantunan Seksual Kanak-kanak Dalam Talian. Jurnal Wacana Sarjana, 5(4), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ponton, L. E., & Judice, S. (2004). Typical adolescent sexual development. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13(3), 497–511. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Saifuddin, S. (2021). Peruntukan Beban Pembuktian di Bawah Enakmen Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah: Satu Penilaian. Jurnal Undang-undang dan Masyarakat, 28, 78-91. https://doi.org./10.17576/juum-2021-28-08. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Suhaizad Saifuddin, Ruzian Markom and Mohd. Munzil Muhamad. (2019). Kaedah pembuktian dalam undang-undang keterangan mahkamah syariah dan mahkamah sivil di Malaysia: Suatu kajian perbandingan. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia,31(1), 1 ‒ 34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Saifuddin , S., Mat Rashid, A., Bahori, A., & Yahya, M. A. (2021). Peranan Undang-Undang Syariah di Malaysia Dalam Melindungi Hak Kanak-Kanak Berdasarkan Maqasid Al-Shari’ah: The Role of Syariah Law of Malaysia In Protecting The Children’s Rights Based on Maqasid Al-Shari’ah. Journal of Muwafaqat, 4(1), 93–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Saifuddin, S., Hashim, F. Y., Zahir, M. Z. M., & Ab Halim, A. H. (2025). Enforcement of Sharia criminal offences in cyberspace: Challenges from Malaysian legal perspective. Prophetic Law Review, 7(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss1.art2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Saifuddin, S., Ali Tajuddin, H. H., Yahya, M. A., Abd Rahman, M. R., & Hashim, F. Y. (2024). Examining The Application of Standard of Proof in Criminal Cases: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Law and Common Law in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no1.491. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Public Prosecutor v Mohd Sukri bin Mohd Hasan [2022] MLJU 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Hazrul bin Harizal [2023] MLJU 1549. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sexual Offences Act 2003 (United Kingdom). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Penal Code (Cap. 224, 2008 Revised Edition) (Singapore). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.