A Comparative Study of Manual Approach and Centralized Digital Database
Authors
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Nur Liyana Sahira binti Mohamad Isa
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Fatin Nurul Aqilah binti Abdul Hamid
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200165
Subject Category: Computer Science – Web Technology / Software Engineering / Information Systems
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 2180-2192
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-11
Accepted: 2026-02-16
Published: 2026-02-27
Abstract
The construction industry is progressing toward Construction 4.0; however, project-level information management practices remain predominantly reliant on informal communication tools such as messaging applications and email. This misalignment between technological advancement and operational practice results in fragmented information flows, limited traceability, data silos, and reduced coordination efficiency. This study critically evaluates the limitations of decentralized, manual communication approaches and proposes a centralized, cloud-based information management system tailored for the delivery of built environment projects. A comparative analytical approach was adopted, guided by the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC), encompassing feasibility assessment, requirements analysis, system design, development modelling, and implementation planning. The evaluation focused on key governance and performance criteria, including accessibility, interoperability, auditability, real-time visibility, and decision-support capability. The findings indicate that manual communication methods contribute to record duplication, delayed information retrieval, constrained managerial oversight, and weakened stakeholder coordination. In contrast, a centralized cloud-based system enhances structured documentation control, integrates project data streams, and provides real-time visibility into work progress, thereby strengthening information governance and enabling evidence-based decision-making. This study contributes to built environment scholarship by positioning project-level information governance as a foundational enabler of Construction 4.0 readiness and by offering a structured framework to support the digital transition in construction project management.
Keywords
Information Management, Workflow Automation, Cloud-based
Downloads
References
1. Chandramohan, Arun, B. A. K. S. Perera, and K. G. Dewagoda. "Diversification of professional quantity surveyors' roles in the construction industry: the skills and competencies required." International Journal of Construction Management 22, no. 7 (2022): 1374-1381. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1720058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Waqar, Ahsan, Idris Othman, Saleh Hayat, Dorin Radu, Muhammad Basit Khan, Teofil Florin Galatanu, Hammad R. Almujibah, Marijana Hadzima-Nyarko, and Omrane Benjeddou. "Building information modeling-empowering construction projects with end-to-end life cycle management." Buildings 13, no. 8 (2023): 2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Statsenko, Larissa, Aparna Samaraweera, Javad Bakhshi, and Nicholas Chileshe. "Construction 4.0 technologies and applications: A systematic literature review of trends and potential areas for development." Construction Innovation 23, no. 5 (2023): 961-993.https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-07-2021-0135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Pan, Yue, and Limao Zhang. "A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management." Automation in Construction 124 (2021): 103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103564 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Mohd Nawi, Mohd Nasrun, Nazim Hussain Baluch, and Ahmad Yusni Bahaudin. "Impact of fragmentation issue in construction industry: An overview." In MATEC web of conferences, vol. 15, p. 01009. EDP Sciences, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20141501009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Lu, Yujie, Yongkui Li, Miroslaw Skibniewski, Zhilei Wu, Runshi Wang, and Yun Le. "Information and communication technology applications in architecture, engineering, and construction organizations: A 15-year review." Journal of Management in Engineering 31, no. 1 (2015): A4014010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Prajapati, Priteshkumar, and Parth Shah. "A review on secure data deduplication: Cloud storage security issue." Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences 34, no. 7 (2022): 3996-4007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.10.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hossain, Mohammad Ikbal. "Software development life cycle (SDLC) methodologies for information systems project management." International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research 5, no. 5 (2023): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i05.6223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Nasir, Siti Rashidah Mohd, Nur Amirah Mohd Sahidi, and Sulaiman Hasim. "Digital Transformation Barriers in the Malaysian Construction Industry: Staff Competency, and Company Initiatives." In International Conference on Innovation & Entrepreneurship in Computing, Engineering & Science Education (InvENT 2024), pp. 109-118. Atlantis Press, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bajpai A, Misra SC. 2021. Analyzing key barriers for adoption of digitalization in Indian construction industry: a case study. Singapore: Springer; p.683-693. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4299-6_56 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Olanrewaju, AbdulLateef, Seong Yeow Tan, and Lee Foo Kwan. "Roles of communication on performance of the construction sector." Procedia engineering 196 (2017): 763-770.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Chen, Xichen, Alice Yan Chang-Richards, Antony Pelosi, Yaodong Jia, Xuesong Shen, Mohsin K. Siddiqui, and Nan Yang. "Implementation of technologies in the construction industry: a systematic review." Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 29, no. 8 (2022): 3181-3209 https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2021-0172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Salleh, Norazlin Mat. "Quantity surveyors’ roles and responsibilities in different job sectors." International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i10/8271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Yang, Pan, Naixue Xiong, and Jingli Ren. "Data security and privacy protection for cloud storage: A survey." Ieee Access 8 (2020): 131723-131740. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3009876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kopsida, Maria, and Ioannis Brilakis. “Real-Time Volume-to-Plane Comparison for Mixed Reality-Based Progress Monitoring.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 34, no. 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000896 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Islam, M. M. (2020). Impact of digital construction management platforms on project performance post-COVID-19. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.63125/nqp0zh08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Nikmehr, B., Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Digitalization as a strategic means of achieving sustainable efficiencies in construction management: A critical review. Sustainability, 13(9), 5040. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]