Community Safety Mechanisms in the Anglophone Armed Conflict: Lessons from Tole-Bwiyuku and Mile 16 Bolifamba in the South West Region of Cameroon

Authors

Stephen Ajanga Obah ECHOCHU

Department of International Relations and Conflict Resolution, University of Buea, Cameroon (Cameroon)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200163

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 2161-2171

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-01

Accepted: 2026-01-06

Published: 2026-02-27

Abstract

In the face of persistent insecurity and the erosion of formal state protection, communities caught in the Anglophone armed conflict in Cameroon have had no choice but to adopt self-survival strategies as a means to navigate the high insecurity and stay safe. This research examines the community-driven safety mechanisms adopted by civilians to navigate the Anglophone armed conflict, with a specific focus on the rural community of Tole-Bwiyuku and the peri-urban settlement of Mile 16 Bolifamba in the South West Region of Cameroon. Anchored in the Community Resilience Theory, the research challenges the perception of conflict-affected populations as passive victims, thereby highlighting their roles as active agents in their own protection. With a qualitative research approach and a comparative case study design, data were collected through ten (10) Key Informant Interviews (KIIs), two (02) Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) of eight (08) members per group, and direct field observations. The findings reveal five core safety strategies: unarmed civilian self-protection, informal early-warning and information-sharing systems, collective negotiation with armed actors, mobility and routine adaptation, and the formation of community watch (vigilante) groups. The study demonstrates that while Tole-Bwiyuku prioritized agricultural continuity and Mile 16 focused on navigating transit-related volatility, both communities leveraged social cohesion, local legitimacy, and traditional institutions to mitigate violence in the absence of state protection. These findings offer critical insights for peacebuilders and humanitarian actors, suggesting that resilience-based interventions should be rooted in existing grassroots networks to enhance civilian security and social continuity in fragile contexts.

Keywords

Community Safety, Anglophone Armed Conflict, Civilian Protection, Community Resilience

Downloads

References

1. Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Autesserre, S. (2021). The frontlines of peace: An insider’s guide to changing the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Awasom, N. F. (2021). The Anglophone problem in Cameroon yesterday and today. Journal of African Studies, 7(2), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baines, E. (2014). Forced marriage as a political project: Sexual rules and relations in the Lord’s Resistance Army. Journal of Peace Research, 51(3), 405–417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baines, E. (2017). Buried in the heart: Women, complex victimhood and the war in northern Uganda.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baker, B. (2008). Multi-choice policing in Africa: Is the continent following the South African pattern? Policing and Society, 18(2), 204–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Che, T. M. (2021). The Anglophone crisis in Cameroon: Internal displacement and humanitarian response. African Security Review, 30(1), 60–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. International Crisis Group. (2020). Cameroon’s Anglophone crisis: How to get to talks? Africa Report No. 272. International Crisis Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Justino, P. (2012). War and poverty. In M. R. Garfinkel & S. Skaperdas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the Economics of Peace and Conflict (pp. 676–704). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kaplan, O. (2017). Resisting war: How communities protect themselves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Konings, P., & Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2019). Anglophone Cameroon at the crossroads. Langaa Research & Publishing CIG. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Krings, T. (2022). Everyday survival in conflict zones: Civilian strategies and adaptive practices. Journal of Modern African Studies, 60(1), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mahony, L., & Eguren, L. E. (1997). Unarmed civilian peacekeeping: A field guide. Nonviolent Peaceforce. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mbaku, J. M. (2022). Decolonization, self-determination, and the Anglophone crisis in Cameroon. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 30(3), 345–368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Meagher, K. (2012). The strength of weak states? Non-state security forces and hybrid governance in Africa. Development and Change, 43(5), 1073–1101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nordstrom, C. (2004). Shadows of war: Violence, power, and international profiteering in the twenty-first century. California: University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience is a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. OECD Development Assistance Committee. (2007). Principles for good international engagement in fragile states and situations. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ojewska, N. (2020). Local self-protection in armed conflicts: Communities as security providers. Civil Wars, 22(2), 256–277. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pouligny, B. (2005). Civil society and post-conflict peacebuilding: Ambiguities of international programmes aimed at building “new” societies. Security Dialogue, 36(4), 495–510. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2023). Cameroon humanitarian needs overview. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Vigh, H. (2008). Crisis and chronicity: Anthropological perspectives on continuous conflict and decline. Ethnos, 73(1), 5–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wallace, D. (2016). Civilian self-protection in violent conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles