The Relationship Between Physical Work Environment, Working Conditions and Workplace Layout and Employee Work Performance Among Manufacturing Operators at a Manufacturing Company
Authors
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200184
Subject Category: Human Resources
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 2449-2466
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-09
Accepted: 2026-02-14
Published: 2026-02-28
Abstract
A favourable work environment is crucial in promoting the employee work performance, especially in the manufacturing sector. Nonetheless, there is limited empirical data available on the influence of specific dimensions in the work environment as far as affecting the employee work performance in the Malaysian manufacturing setting. Grounded in Person-Environment Fit Theory, the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model, and the Individual Work Performance Model, this study examines the relationship between the physical work environment, working conditions, and workplace layout on the performance of 169 manufacturing operators. The SPSS was used to analyze the data using descriptive and inferential statistics, which also included Pearson correlation analysis. The results show that the physical work environment, working conditions, workplace layout, and employee work performance were moderate. The Pearson correlation analysis also found that the physical work environment, working conditions and workplace layout had positive and significant relationships with employee work performance. These findings can be applied to imply that the workplace conditions, space configuration, and physical infrastructure can be enhanced to achieve better employee work performance. The paper also adds the empirical evidence to the Malaysian manufacturing setting and its impact on specific practical implications that can be offered to organizations interested in enhancing productivity and the well-being of the employees.
Keywords
Work Environment, Employee Work Performance, Physical Work Environment, Working Conditions, Workplace Layout
Downloads
References
1. Akib, H., Arianasari, A. D., & Arhas, S. H. (2024). Effectiveness of implementation of office spatial principles in the Education and Culture Office of Pangkajene Regency and Islands. Journal of Public Policy and Local Government, 1(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.70188/z5d4j460 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Van Der Voordt, T., Aussems, R., Arentze, T., & Blanc, P.L. (2020). Impact of activity-based workplaces on burnout and engagement dimensions. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 22(4), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-09-2019-0041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bashir, A., Amir, A., Jawaad, M., & Hasan, T. (2020). Work conditions and job performance: An indirect conditional effect of motivation. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1801961. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1801961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational behaviour, 31(3), 248-267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Care, F. R. a. M., Subagio, B. S., & Rahman, H. (2018). Porous concrete basic property criteria as rigid pavement base layer in Indonesia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 147(1), 02008. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814702008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cotton, K. 2003. Principals and student achievement: What the research says. Alexandria. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chowdhury, S., Asadujjaman, M., & Hossain, M. (2022). Layout Optimization and Workplace Engineering for Improving Manufacturing Performance with Reference to A RMG Industry. In 5th [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. International Conference in Industrial and Mechanical Engineering and Operations Management (IMEOM), (pp. 308-319). https://doi.org/10.46254/BD05.20220117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Djanuar, T. M., Krisnandi, H., Digdowiseiso, K., & Ngah, A. H. (2024). Effect of occupational health safety, work discipline, motivation, and work environment on employee performance. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 4(1), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i01.682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Efawati, Y. (2020). The influence of working conditions, workability and leadership on employee performance. International Journal Administration Business and Organization, 1(3), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.61242/ijabo.20.40 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Fallman, S. L., Jutengren, G., & Dellve, L. (2019). The impact of restricted decision-making autonomy on health care managers' health and work performance. Journal of nursing management, 27(4), 706– 714. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12741 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ghimire, B., Kumar, R., Dahal, Rai, B., & Upadhyay, D. (2023). Employee Performance Factors in the Nepalese Commercial Banks: Insights from Emerging Markets. Journal of Logistics Informatics and Service Science,10(2), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.33168/jliss.2023.0203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Great Place to Work®. (2023, August 30). Great Place to Work announces the 2023 Best Workplaces in Asia, representing 5.9 million employee experiences. PRNewswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/great-place-to-work-announces-the-2023-bestworkplaces-in-asia-representing-5-9-million-employee-experiences-301909197.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hamidi, N. N. E., Mansor, F. A., Hashim, M. Z., Muhammad, N., & Wan Azib, W. N.H. (2020). The relationship between physical workplace environment and employees' performance. Journal of Contemporary Social Science Research, 4(1), 56-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hertzog, M.A. (2008), Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(1) 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hsieh, M., Zhang, Y., Dong, R., Lee, Y., & Ni, C. (2022). Use of EEG signals, cortisol secretion, and task performance to evaluate the effects of different lighting environments on concentration level in a sustained attention task. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 92(1), 103371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ismail, N., & Rosdi, I. S. (2022). Individual Work Performance Success Factors: Revisiting the Human Performance System Model. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 12(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2022.12.2.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Kabugade, R., & Erande, A. D. –. (2023). Study The Working Conditions and Performance of The Employees in Selected Universities. Paripex-Indian Journal of Research, 12(4), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/0906545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Karla, D., Pandey, V. K., Rastogi, P., & Kumar, S. (2022). A Comprehensive review on Significance of Problem-Solving Abilities in Workplace. World Journal of English Language, 12(3), 88. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n3p88 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., De Vet Henrica, C., & Van Der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e318226a763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Kovács, G. (2020). Combination of Lean value-oriented conception and facility layout design for even more significant efficiency improvement and cost reduction. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2916–2936. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1712490 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Králiková, R., Lumnitzer, E., Džuňová, L., & Yehorova, A. (2021). Analysis of the impact of working environment factors on employee’s health and wellbeing; Workplace lighting design evaluation and improvement. Sustainability, 13(16), 8816. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168816 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Kumala, F. (2023). The influence of job demand and work environment on employee performance. Talent Journal of Economics and Business, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.59422/jeb.v1i01.187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Laomongkholchaisri, N., Arandorn, N., Wangsaward, T., & Musikanit, S. (2024). Plant layout and design of Central Supply Laundry Department: a case study of a hospital in Songkhla province. Engineering and Technology Horizons, 41(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55003/eth.410406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Lavanya, N., & Meti, N. G. (2023). A Study on Impact Of Workplace Environment towards Employees Performance At Toyama Controls And Systems Private Limited In Hoskote. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering And Management, 7(10), 1–11. Https://Doi.Org/10.55041/Ijsrem26620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Lee, C., & Park, S. (2021). Changing Factors of Employee Satisfaction with WorkingConditions: An Analysis of the Korean Working Conditions Survey. Safety and Health at Work, 12(3), 324–338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2021.04.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Li, L. (2024). Working conditions and performance of dance teachers in Chinese universities. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 13(10), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2024.24703 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Malik, I., Abdulahad, S., Saleh, A., & Shabila, N. (2023). Health employees’ perceptions of their working conditions. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 18(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i1.2141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Ministry of Economy Malaysia. (2024, June). The Malaysian economy in figures 2023. https://ekonomi.gov.my/sites/default/files/2024-06/The_Malaysian_Economy_in_Figures_2023.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Mishra, S., & Narendra, P. (2020). An Overview of Ergonomics. Journal of Ergonomics Research, 3(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.37532/jeor.2020.3(1).111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Munn, S. K. S., & Azalea, A. (2024). Physical work environment satisfaction and productivity of working adults in Malaysia. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 38(1),1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Nazirwan, N., & Fadhlan, F. (2024). Performance of the state civil apparatus in the General Administration and Personnel section at the Sawahlunto City Population Control and Family Planning Health Service. Adabi Journal of Public Administration and Business, 11(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.62066/jpab.v11i1.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Ņikadimovs, O., & Vēvere, V. (2024). The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: University Social Responsibility and stakeholders’ Perceptions. Environment Technology Resources Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 2(1), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol2.8015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Nusraningrum, D., Rahmawati, A., Wider, W., Jiang, L., & Udang, L. N. (2024).Enhancing employee performance through motivation: the mediating roles of green work environments and engagement in Jakarta’s logistics sector. Frontiers in Sociology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1392229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire, design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter Pub Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Page, G., & Tolmie, J. (2024). Physical working environments: how they affect our wellbeing and performance. In Practice, 46(3), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/inpr.420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Petkar, R. (2019). Design, development and evaluation of plant layout for optimized material movement. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 7(10), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2019.10038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Pimpong, M. (2023). Work Environmental Factors and its Impact on Employee Productivity: The Mediating Role of Employee Commitment. E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences, 916–935. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2023482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Platania, S., Morando, M., Gruttadauria, S. V., & Koopmans, L. (2023). The Individual Work Performance Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties of the Italian version. European Journal of [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Investigation in Health Psychology and Education, 14(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14010004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Putri, N. N. R. S., Zulqarnain, N. C. A., & Farhan, N. M. (2023). Pengaruh kinerjakaryawan terhadap kualitas SDM dan organisasi. MUQADDIMAH Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 1(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.59246/muqaddimah.v1i2.211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Rahman, R. S., Nurdiansyah, H., Sidharta, I., Purana, R. D., & Hendiky, F. (2024).Increasing employee performance through physical work environment and work motivation. Journal of Economics Management and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.55208/jeme.v2i1.158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Ravalier, J., Jones, D., Truell, R., & McFadden, P. (2022). Global social work working conditions and wellbeing. International Social Work, 65(6), 1078–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728221112731 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Rendiani, Karmila, M., & Sutrisna, A. (2024). The Influence of Work Discipline And Physical Work Environment On Employee Performance In the Tailor Department PT. Tjiwulan Putra Mandiri Tasik. Jurnal Pusat Manajemen, 1(2),69–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Saefullah, M., & Basrowi, B. (2022). Dampak Lingkungan Kerja Fisik TerhadapKinerja Dan Kepuasan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Karyawan Bagian Produksi. Jurnal Bina Bangsa Ekonomika, 15(2), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.46306/jbbe.v15i2.183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Sailer, K., Koutsolampros, P., & Pachilova, R. (2021). Differential perceptions of teamwork, focused work and perceived productivity as an effect of desk characteristics within a workplace layout. PLoS ONE, 16(4), e0250058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Santoso, A. B., & Oktafien, S. (2024). The impact of a conducive work environment on improving employee performance. Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 23(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.24123/mabis.v23i1.722 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Savandha, S. D., Azzahra, A., & Purbasari, N. K. (2024). Task ambiguity: the effects of missing standard operating procedures and Inter-Leadership harmony inorganizations. American Journal of Economic and Management Business (AJEMB), 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58631/ajemb.v3i1.80 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2013) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach.6th Edition, Wiley, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Shaari, R., Sarip, A., & Ramadhinda, S. (2022c). A study of the influence of physical work environments on employee performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i12/15975 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Shafi, M. A., Le, N. S., Zulkipli, H., Hasim, M. A., & Yusoff , M. Z. (2023). The Effect of Work Environment on Employee Productivity: A Case Study of Manufacturing Company. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.24191/jibe.v8i1.24025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Sonnentag, S., Völker, J., & Wehrt, W. (2025). Good and bad days at work: Descriptive review of daylevel and experience‐sampling studies. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 46(2), 207-226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Tabassum, S., Siddiqui, I. H., & Shabbir, M. H. (2021). Impact of physical workspace environment factors on employee performance and turnover intention. International Journal of Management (IJM), 12(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Tabe-Afshar, S., Toofan, S., & Saghafi-Asl, A. (2023). Studying the role of workplaces layout on employee’s health: Sick building syndrome. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics, 9(4), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.18502/iehfs.v9i4.14299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Tarigan, N. N. M. R., Syahputra, N. R. A., & Yudha, N. T. K. (2022). The analysis of quality of work life and work achievement in Department of Agriculture Simalungun Regency. SIASAT Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Studies, 7(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Triansyah, F. A., Hejin, W., & Stefania, S. (2023). Factors Affecting employee Performance: A Systematic review. Journal Markcount Finance, 1(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.55849/jmf.v1i2.102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Tuffaha, M. (2020). The Determinants of Employee’s Performance: A Literature review. Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), p14. https://doi.org/10.30560/jems.v3n3p14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Van Der Voordt, T., & Jensen, P. A. (2021). The impact of healthy workplaces on employee satisfaction, productivity and costs. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 25(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-032021-0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Vogel, H. G., Maas, J., & Gebauer, A. (Eds.). (2010). Drug discovery and evaluation: methods in clinical pharmacology. Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Wibowo, H., Rahmawati, R., & Anisah, H. U. (2024). Conceptualising Factors Affecting Performance in Organisational Ecosystem. International Conference of Business and Social Sciences, 4(1), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.24034/icobuss.v4i1.519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Williamson, M.K., & Perumal, K. (2021). Exploring the consequences of person–environment misfit in the workplace: A qualitative study. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 47(1), a1798. https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJIP.V47I0.1798 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Wolkoff, P., Azuma, K., & Carrer, P. (2021). Health, work performance, and risk of infection in officelike environments: The role of indoor temperature, air humidity, and ventilation. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 233(1), 113709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113709 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Yacoub, G., & Haefliger, S. (2022). Coworking spaces and collaborative practices. Sage Journals, 31(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221074037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Youssef, F. A. A. (2023). Dimensions of Achieving Security and Occupational Safetyfor Social Workers in the Health Sector at Cairo University, Egypt. Journal of Human Security, 19(2). 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Zhenjing, G., Chupradit, S., Ku, K. Y., Nassani, A. A., & Haffar, M. (2022). Impactof Employees' Workplace Environment on Employees' Performance: A Multi-Mediation Model. Frontiers in public health, 10(1), 890400. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.890400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Zurnizam, N. A., Ishak, M. F., Saidon, J., Syed Omar, S. A., & Mashahadi, F. (2024).The Effect of Work Stress and Work Environment on Job Performance in Manufacturing Industry: A PLS-SEM Approach. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3S(I)a.4132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]