Development and Acceptability of Nutritionally Enhanced Azolla (Azolla Pinnata) Flavored Kropek

The study employed a developmental-experimental research design using five treatments arranged in a single-factor framework: Treatment A (10% Azolla), Treatment B (20% Azolla), Treatment C (30% Azolla), Treatment D (40% Azolla), and a control (commercial store-bought Kropek). A 9-point Hedonic Rating Scale was utilized to collect sensory data from 21 respondents. Statistical analysis included the computation of mean scores and the application of Welch’s Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post hoc testing to determine significant differences among treatments. Results of the sensory evaluation revealed that Treatment D (40% Azolla) obtained the highest mean rating in flavor and demonstrated a statistically significant difference compared to Treatment B (20% Azolla). No significant differences were observed in appearance, aroma, texture, and sound. Based on overall consumer acceptability, Treatment D was the most preferred formulation, receiving qualitative ratings equivalent to “Like Very Much” to “Extremely Like.” Storage observation indicated that the fried Azolla-Kropek remained stable for approximately three to four weeks under proper dry and airtight conditions, maintaining acceptable texture and sensory quality. Cost analysis further showed that the product is economically feasible for small-scale or school-based production. The findings indicate that Azolla (A. pinnata) can be successfully incorporated into Kropek without compromising sensory acceptability while potentially enhancing its nutritional value and sustainability as a snack alternative

Azolla, Azolla pinnata, kropek, sensory evaluation, shelf-life

1. Amit S., Amit K., Anoop P., & Ashok K. (2016). Azolla – An environment eco-friendly pteridophytic species. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Science, 3(6), 210-213. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328146540_AZOLLA-AN_ENVIRONMENT_ECOFRIENDLY_PTERIDOPHYTIC_SPECIES [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chen, Y., Liu, Y., & Feng, X. (2023). Food perception: Taste, smell and flavour. Foods, 12(19), 3628. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193628 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. De Santis, D. (2024). Food flavor chemistry and sensory evaluation. Foods, 13(5), 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13050634 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Huang, M., Fan, G., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Editorial: Flavor chemistry of food: Mechanism, interaction, new advances. Frontiers in Nutrition, 10, 1243606. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1243606 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Korsa G., Alemu D., and Ayele A. (2024). Azolla plant production and their potential applications. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1716440 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kumar, G., & Chander, H. (2017). A study on the potential of Azolla pinnata as livestock feed supplement for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Asian Journal of Advanced Basic Sciences, 5(2), 65-68. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320444318_A_Study_on_the_Potential_of_Azolla_pinnata_as_Livestock_Feed_Supplement_for_Climate_Change_Adaptation_and_Mitigation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mathur G.N., Sharma R., & Choudhary P.C. (2013). Use of Azolla (Azolla pinnata) as cattle feed supplement. J. Krishi Vigyan, 2 (1), 73-75. Retrieved from https://iskv.in/wp-content/themes/iskv/volumepdfs/77c375b4c30658fe6bd13845afae0010jkv-2-1-018.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Meilgaard, M. C., Civille, G. V., & Carr, B. T. (2016). Sensory evaluation techniques (5th ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439832271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Putra M.A., Nurrachmi I., & Effendi I. (2022). Population growth and chlorophyll content of Spirulina platensis fertilized with Azolla microphylla. Tropical Marine Environmental Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17, 2022. DOI: 10.31258/tromes.1.1.1-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Roque, J., Auvray, M., & Lafraire, J. (2018). Understanding freshness perception from the cognitive mechanisms of flavor: The case of beverages. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Roy, D., Pakhira, S. B., & Bera, M. C. (2016). A review on biology, cultivation and utilization of Azolla. Advances in Life Sciences, 5(1), 11-15. Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303487247_A_Review_on_Biology_Cultivation_and_Utilizati on_of_Azolla [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ruiz-Capillas, C., & Herrero, A. M. (2021). Sensory analysis and consumer research in new product development. Foods, 10(3), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030582 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Spence, C. (2019). On the relationship(s) between color and taste/flavor. Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000439 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ting Y.J., Kamaruddin N.A., & Mohamad S.S. (2022). Nutritional evaluation of Azolla pinnata and Azolla microphylla as feed supplements for dairy ruminants. Journal of Agrobiotechnology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 17-23, 2022. DOI: 10.37231/jab.2022.13.1S.314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Weir, K. (2019, April). A matter of taste. American Psychological Association, 50(4). https://www.apa.org/monitor/2019/04/cover-taste [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Yao Y., Zhang M., Tian Y., Zhao M., Zeng K., Zhang B., Zhao M., & Yin B. (2018). Azolla biofertilizer for improving low nitrogen use efficiency in an intensive rice cropping system. Field Crops Research, 216, 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.11.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zafra, T. S., Torregosa, M. V., & Chua, A. L. (2025). Sensory evaluation and application of ginger- and lemon-flavored kropek: Effects on consumer acceptability and shelf life. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 12(2), 679-692. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v12y2025i2p679-692.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]