Risk-Informed or Merely Compliant? A Qualitative Review of Barangay Drrm Plans in Naga City, Philippines

Authors

Edilberto A. San Carlos

Master of Disaster Risk Management Central Bicol State University of Agriculture, San Jose, Pili, Camarines Sur (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200197

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 2619-2627

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-08

Accepted: 2026-02-16

Published: 2026-03-01

Abstract

Barangays play a critical role in disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM) in the Philippines, serving as the frontline institutions for preparedness, response, and recovery. While national policies provide standardized templates for Barangay DRRM (BDRRM) Plans, questions remain as to whether these plans are substantively risk-informed or primarily compliance-driven. This study qualitatively reviews the BDRRM Plans of 27 barangays in Naga City to examine the extent to which plan content reflects localized risk conditions rather than mere adherence to prescribed formats.
The study employed a qualitative document review and thematic analysis of approved BDRRM Plans, supported by triangulation with multiple secondary data sources, including the Naga City Integrated Risk Analysis, Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment, climate risk projections, a barangay-level Social Vulnerability Index, and documented impacts of a recent major tropical cyclone. A researcher-designed assessment scorecard was used as a supplementary qualitative aid to document patterns of full, partial, or absent articulation across key plan components. Analysis focused on internal plan coherence, risk articulation, integration of social vulnerability, and responsiveness to observed disaster experience.

Keywords

Disaster Risk Reduction and Management; Barangay DRRM Plans; Risk-Informed Planning

Downloads

References

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Manila Observatory. (2019). Naga City climate and disaster risk assessment. Ateneo de Naga University and Manila Observatory. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Republic Act No. 10121. (2010). An act strengthening the Philippine disaster risk reduction and management system, providing for the national disaster risk reduction and management framework and institutionalizing the national disaster risk reduction and management plan. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2010/05/27/republic-act-no-10121/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Van Aalst, M. K., Cannon, T., & Burton, I. (2008). Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles