Love, Law, and Litigation: Legal Perspectives on Breach of Promise to Marry in Malaysia

Claims for breach of promise to marry remain actionable in Malaysia, unlike in many other jurisdictions where such claims have been abolished. One reason for the removal of these claims is the perception that they often stem from motives of financial gain. However, in several Asian countries, these claims continue to be recognised. By employing a doctrinal methodology that examines statutory provisions, case reports, and scholarly writings, this article aims to explore the foundations of breach of promise claims in Malaysia and the process of awarding compensatory damages from social, cultural, and religious perspectives. It also investigates the extent to which compensatory damages are granted in breach of promise cases, particularly in relation to the empowerment of women's rights in Malaysia

Breach of Promise; Compensatory Damages; Women's Rights; Malaysian

1. Abdullah, N. C. (2022). Remedies for breach of betrothal: The quest for survival? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(12), 43 – 51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aman, J., Abbas, J., Nurunnabi, M., & Bano, S. (2019). The relationship of religiosity and marital satisfaction: The role of religious commitment and practices on marital satisfaction among Pakistani respondents. Behavioural Sciences, 9(3), 30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brinig, M.F. (1990). Rings and promises. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organisation, 6(1), 203-215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cousens, T.W. (1932). Law of damages as applied to breach of promise of marriage. Cornell Law Review, 17, 367-394. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gan, J.E. (2014). Breach of promise of marriage: Uncertain legal terrain and the complex contours of Shariah law. Malayan Law Journal, 2, i-x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gawas, V. M. (2017). Doctrinal legal research method a guiding principle in reforming the law and legal system towards the research development. International Journal of Law, 3(5), 128–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gunther, R. (2017, June 2017). When promises become lies: The six most common types of excuses for broken promises. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/rediscovering-love/201706/when-promises-become-lies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hairom, N. (2024, October 3). Weddings called off: Compensation claims available for affected parties. Sinar Daily. https://www.sinardaily.my/article/221969/focus/national/weddings-called-off-compensation-claims-available-for-affected-parties [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Halili, F. & Riza, A. (2016). The betrothal and marriage – according to Islamic law (Shariah) and under the secular system. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2852815 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Haseli, A., Shariati, M., Nazari, M., Keramat, A. & Emamian, M.H. (2019). Infidelity and its associated factors: a systematic review. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(8), 1155-1169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hutchinson, T. & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83-119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. shak, B., & Ab Aziz, S. B. (2022). A historical exposition on the fundamental features of the Federal Constitution and its importance to judicial interpretation: a study on Article 121 (1A). IIUMLJ, 30, 226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jafari, F., Neisani Samani, L., Fatemi, N., Ta'avoni, S., & Abolghasemi, J. (2015). Marital satisfaction and adherence to religion. Journal of Medicine and Life, 8(Spec Issue 4), 214–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kaintura, M., Gill, H., Verma, S., Rawat, P., Jha, R.S. & Kumar, S. (2022). Legal study of sexual intercourse on the false pretext of marriage. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 6317-6323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lettmaier, S. (2010). Broken engagements: The action for breach of promise of marriage and the feminine ideal, 1800-1940. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Majid, M.K. (1991). Family Law in Malaysia. Malayan Law Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mercer, C. L. (1971). Engagement, breach of promise and seduction. Zimbabwe Law Journal, 11(1), 48-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mohd, A., Kadir, N. A., & Ibrahim, B. (2024). Betrothal and general damages for humiliation: an appraisal on harmonisation of shari'ah and civil law. IIUM Law Journal, 32(2), 86-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Peetz, J., & Kammrath, L. (2011). Only because I love you: why people make and why they break promises in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 887–904. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rokach, A., & Chan, S. H. (2023). Love and infidelity: Causes and consequences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 3904. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tajuddin, N.M. & Gunardi, S. (2024). Breach of betrothal in Malaysia: a comparative study between Syariah and civil law. Jurnal Syari’ah & Hukum, 6(1), 91-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wright, H. F. (1924). The action for breach of the marriage promise. Virginia Law Review, 10(5), 361–383. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study