The Relationship Between Flexible Work Arrangements on Employees’ Work Performance Among Generation Z

Authors

Athirah Wilda

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Mohamed Ayyub Hassan

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Mohd Azhar Abd Hamid

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Zuliana Zoolkefli

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Siti Sofia Khadijah

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Muhammad Luqman Murshid

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Nur Syafiqah Hazirah

UiTM Cawangan Rembau, Negeri Sembilan. (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200214

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 2889-2902

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-12

Accepted: 2026-02-17

Published: 2026-03-02

Abstract

Flexible work arrangements (FWAs), including remote work, flextime, and hybrid models, have become increasingly important in modern employment, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. For Generation Z, born between the mid-1990s and early 2010s, flexibility, autonomy, and digital integration are essential workplace expectations. While global studies highlight both benefits and challenges of FWAs, limited research exists in Malaysia, especially concerning their impact on Gen Z employees. This study aims to examine the relationship between FWAs and employee work performance among Generation Z employees in Telecommunication Company, Melaka. A quantitative design was employed using structured questionnaires, with two validated instruments: the Flexible Work Arrangement Questionnaire (Bijsterveldt, 2015) and the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (Platania et al., 2023). The unit of analysis was individual employees, and data were collected from 86 Gen Z respondents. Findings revealed that FWAs were moderately implemented, while employee performance levels were generally high. Pearson’s correlation analysis indicated a significant positive relationship between FWAs and work performance, particularly in task and contextual performance, while counterproductive work behaviour showed a negative association. The study concludes that FWAs enhance motivation, productivity, and retention of Gen Z talent. This study also recommends structured FWA policies, digital collaboration tools, and managerial training to optimize flexible practices.

Keywords

Flexible Work Arrangements, Employee Work Performance, Generation Z, Malaysia

Downloads

References

1. Akbar, A. F., & Amalia, I. (2023). Exploring the impact of flexible work arrangements, social support, gender, and job category on the work-life balance of Generation Z workers. Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 25(2), 159-173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amirul, S. R., & Shaari, S. C. (2021). An overview: twenty years of flexible working arrangements. Advances in Business Research International Journal, 7(2), 27-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ariani, M., Tamara, D., Yuliani, T., Saraswati, W., Arrywibowo, I., & Darma, D. C. (2025). Employee performance and several predicting factors: A causality and strategy implication. Corporate and Business Strategy Review, 6(1, special issue), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1siart6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Awang, N., & Nadzri, N. R. M. (2023). The implementation of flexible work arrangements (FWAs) and its impact for work-life balance of women’s workforce. I-iECONS e-proceedings, 438-449. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 10(1), 25-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bijsterveldt, A. V. (2015). The effect of flexible working arrangements on employee well-being, moderated by social support. Master Thesis Human Resources Studies, 2-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brega, C., Briones, S., Javornik, J., León, M., & Yerkes, M. (2023). Flexible work arrangements for work-life balance: a cross-national policy evaluation from a capabilities perspective. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 43(13/14), 278-294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. De Chlarence, J. M., Shanmugam, R., & Rajeswari, P. S. (2022). Generation Z at workplace. NeuroQuantology, 20(5), 3717-3729. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis.46-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ismail, S. R., & Michael, F. L. (2023). Systematic review of flexible work arrangements impact on employee performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(11), 825-839. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., De Vet, H. C., & Van Der Beek, A. J. (2014). Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 56(3), 331-337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lee, Z. (2024). Cultural contexts and policy frameworks: Examining work-life balance initiatives in East Asia. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 08(09), 76–102. https://doi.org/10.51505/ijebmr.2024.8906 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Liao, K. C. (2024). Generational Differences in Work Ethic During Covid-19 Pandemic Remote Work (Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University), 232-284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. McCollough, J. (2023). The effects of various forms of flexible work practices on the performance of personnel in healthcare organizations (Order No. 30250017). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2796312590). Retrieved from https://vpn.utm.my/dissertations-theses/effects-various-forms-flexible-work-practices-on/docview/2796312590/se-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nasir, N. S. M. (2023). Exploring Employee Preferences and Organizational Strategies for Flexibility Adapting Work Arrangements in The Post-Covid-19 Era: A Concept Paper. Journal of Business Innovation, 8(1), 113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Platania, S., & Koopmans, L. (2023). Individual work performance: A new model for flexible work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(5), 812–830. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ray, T. K., & Pana-Cryan, R. (2021). Work flexibility and work-related well-being. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(6), 3254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Retnowati, D. (2024). The impact of flexible work policies on Gen Z employee satisfaction and retention. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 5(2), 123–135. https://dinastipub.org/DIJEFA/article/download/2987/1950/12458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ridwan Aldila Melania Care, F., Sugeng Subagio, B., & Rahman, H. (2018). Porous concrete basic property criteria as rigid pavement base layer in Indonesia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 147, 02008. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814702008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101860. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Scane, B. (2023). Flexibility and precarity in the post-pandemic era: Unveiling new workplace inequalities among young european workers (Order No. 31363942). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (3110364159). Retrieved from https://vpn.utm.my/dissertations-theses/flexibility-precarity-post-pandemic-era-unveiling/docview/3110364159/se-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. john wiley & sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Singh, A. (2023). A descriptive interpretation of flexible work arrangements (FWA) and their impact on organizational outcomes. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 13(4), 205-217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Stoddart, F. A. (2024). The Role of Flexible Work Arrangements in Mitigating Teacher Burnout Caused by Heavy Workloads in Urban Schools. Research and Advances in Education, 3(12), 27-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles