Juridical Sovereignty Versus Substantive Autonomy: Rethinking African Statehood in Contemporary International Relations

Authors

Ngofa Oji Nyimenuate

School of Graduate Studies, University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

K.K. Aaron

School of Graduate Studies, University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

Kialee Nyiayaana

School of Graduate Studies, University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200221

Subject Category: Political Science

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 2984-2999

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-15

Accepted: 2026-02-20

Published: 2026-03-02

Abstract

This study examined the divergence between juridical sovereignty and substantive autonomy in contemporary African statehood. Although African states possessed durable legal recognition, territorial integrity, and formal equality within international society, their capacity for independent economic, strategic, and institutional agency remained uneven. Drawing on dependency theory, the study analyzed how structural incorporation into the global political economy conditioned the exercise of sovereignty beyond its juridical form. A qualitative comparative case study design was employed, focusing on Nigeria, Burkina Faso, and Ethiopia. Data were drawn from scholarly literature, policy documents, and institutional reports and were analyzed through a structured thematic framework centered on economic structure, institutional capacity, security dynamics, and sovereign identity. The findings revealed that juridical sovereignty across the cases remained stable and internationally protected, yet substantive autonomy was mediated by commodity dependence, fiscal vulnerability, security interdependence, and internal identity fragmentation. Economic structures limited policy flexibility, security partnerships reflected relational rather than absolute autonomy, and fragmented domestic cohesion weakened institutional consolidation. While states engaged in strategic diplomatic repositioning and regional initiatives to expand bargaining space, these efforts operated within enduring structural constraints. The study concluded that African sovereignty functioned as a layered construct rather than a binary condition. Legal recognition persisted, but material autonomy required alignment across economic resilience, institutional strength, and cohesive sovereign identity. By refining dependency theory to incorporate security and digital interdependence, the study contributed to international relations scholarship through a multidimensional reconceptualization of sovereignty within global hierarchies.

Keywords

Juridical sovereignty; Substantive autonomy; Dependency theory

Downloads

References

1. Aalen, L. (2011). The politics of ethnicity in Ethiopia: Actors, power and mobilisation under ethnic federalism. Brill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abrahamsen, R. (2023). Africa and international relations in the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Acharya, A. (2014). The end of American world order. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Acharya, A., & Lee, E. (2018). Global governance in a multipolar world. International Affairs, 94(3), 463– 478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Adar, K. G. (2023). The African Union and the evolution of non-indifference. African Security Review, 32(2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Adebayo, A. (2020). State legitimacy and governance challenges in Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 38(4), 567–582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. African Union. (2020). Agenda 2063: The Africa we want. African Union Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ake, C. (1996). Democracy and development in Africa. Brookings Institution Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Alden, C., & Large, D. (2018). New directions in Africa–China studies. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Amo-Agyemang, C. (2021). Multipolarity and African foreign policy agency. African Affairs, 120(480), 321–338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Atabong, A. B. (2021). Digital activism and youth political participation in Africa. African Journalism Studies, 42(3), 89–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ayoade, F. (2020). Digital sovereignty and data governance in Africa. Information Development, 36(4), 523–536. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ayoob, M. (2002). Inequality and theorizing in international relations: The case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review, 4(3), 27–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bhabha, H., & Nyamnjoh, F. (2020). Youth activism and digital publics in Africa. Public Culture, 32(2), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Brown, W., & Harman, S. (2013). African agency in international politics. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Clapham, C. (1996). Africa and the international system: The politics of state survival. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Corkin, L. (2013). Uncovering African agency: Angola's management of China's credit lines. Ashgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ekeh, P. (1975). Colonialism and the two publics in Africa. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 17(1), 91–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Englebert, P. (1997). The contemporary African state: Neither African nor state. Third World Quarterly, 18(4), 767–775. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Englebert, P. (2009). Africa: Unity, sovereignty, and sorrow. Lynne Rienner. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Eze, M. (2021). Counterterrorism and sovereignty in Africa. African Security, 14(2), 89–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Fowler, M. R., & Bunck, J. M. (1996). Law, power, and the sovereign state: The evolution and application of the concept of sovereignty. Penn State Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Frank, A. G. (1966). The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 18(4), 17–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gross, L. (1948). The peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948. American Journal of International Law, 42(1), 20–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Harrison, G. (2001). Post-conditionality politics and administrative reform. Review of African Political Economy, 28(89), 657–670. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Herbst, J. (2000). States and power in Africa. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hinsley, F. H. (1986). Sovereignty (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ibeabuchi, N. C. (2025). African sovereign identity and the politics of autonomy (Doctoral dissertation). University of Uyo. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (2024). Digital governance and data sovereignty in Africa. IISD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Inyang, U. E., & Hamilton, P. R. (2025). Neocolonialism and the African identity crisis: Implications for economic independence and thought leadership. African and Global Issues Quarterly, 5(1), 17–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Jackson, R. H. (1990). Quasi-states: Sovereignty, international relations and the Third World. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Jackson, R. H., & Rosberg, C. G. (1982). Why Africa's weak states persist. World Politics, 35(1), 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Keet, A. (2020). Knowledge, power and decolonial sovereignty. Education as Change, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. M’Baye, B. (2019). Political instability and sovereignty in the Sahel. African Studies Review, 62(4), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mbembe, A. (2001). On the postcolony. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Mkandawire, T. (2015). Neopatrimonialism and the political economy of economic performance in Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. World Politics, 67(3), 563–612. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Morgenthau, H. J. (1985). Politics among nations (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Murithi, T. (2013). The African Union's evolving security architecture. African Security Review, 22(2), 95– 107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Nabudere, D. (2017). Epistemology and African knowledge systems. African Studies Quarterly, 17(3), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2013). Coloniality of power in postcolonial Africa. CODESRIA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Obi, C. (2022). Oil and state fragility in Nigeria. African Affairs, 121(482), 233–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Omeje, K. (2018). Oil politics and insurgency in Nigeria. Journal of Modern African Studies, 56(2), 287– 309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Osaghae, E., & Suberu, R. (2005). A history of identities, violence and stability in Nigeria. CRISE Working Paper No. 6. University of Oxford. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Osiander, A. (2001). Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian myth. International Organization, 55(2), 251–287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Philpott, D. (2001). Revolutions in sovereignty. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Posner, D. N. (2004). The political salience of cultural difference. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 529–545. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Robinson, A. L. (2014). National versus ethnic identification in Africa. World Politics, 66(4), 709–746. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L’Ouverture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Stirk, P. (2012). The Westphalian model and sovereignty. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Tordoff, W., & Apenteng, M. (2021). Russia’s return to Africa. African Security Review, 30(4), 412–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Turianskyi, Y., & Feldman, Y. (2022). Data governance and sovereignty in Africa. South African Journal of International Affairs, 29(1), 67–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). (2023). Assessing the African Continental Free Trade Area. UNECA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world-system. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Williams, P. D. (2011). War and conflict in Africa. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Zeleza, P. T. (2022). Africa and global structural inequality. African Studies Review, 65(3), 523–540. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Zondi, S. (2018). Regional integration and sovereignty in Africa. African Security Review, 27(3), 199–213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Zondi, S. (2021). Sovereignty and geopolitics in the Sahel. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 39(4), 512–529. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles