An Integrated Framework for Improving Online Counseling System Quality: A Case Study Using HOT-FIT, ISO/IEC 25010, and SPBE Models

Authors

Alexius Endy Budianto

Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100, Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Mohd Fairuz Iskandar Othman

Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100, Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Nor Azman Mat Ariff

Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100, Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Intan Maizura Abdul Rashid

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Melaka (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.923MIC3ST25009

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/23 | Page No: 100-124

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-08-12

Accepted: 2025-08-20

Published: 2025-10-24

Abstract

This study proposes a comprehensive framework to enhance the quality of online counseling systems by integrating three key models: the Human-Organization-Technology Fit (HOT-Fit) model, the ISO/IEC 25010 software quality standard, and the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) regulation. The research follows a structured approach comprising needs analysis, framework design, prototype development, system evaluation, and model integration. Using Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA) on data from system users, the findings confirm that the integrated framework enhances system usability, aligns with organizational objectives, and ensures compliance with national digital service standards. Overall, 17 of 21 tested hypotheses were supported, and the model demonstrated good reliability, validity, and overall fit (FIT = 0.386; GFI = 0.943). These results provide practical guidance for developers and policymakers in building secure, user-friendly, and regulation-compliant online counseling platforms.

Keywords

system framework, online counseling, HOT-Fit, ISO/IEC 25010

Downloads

References

1. R. M. Ryan, M. F. Lynch, M. Vansteenkiste, and E. L. Deci, “Motivation and Autonomy in Counseling, Psychotherapy, and Behavior Change: A Look at Theory and Practice 1ψ7,” 2011. doi: 10.1177/0011000009359313. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. R. Wells, “The Impact and Efficacy of E-Counselling in an Open Distance Learning Environment:A Mixed Method Exploratory Study,” J College Stud Psychother, vol. 37, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1080/87568225.2021.1924098. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Peraturan Presiden 132, “Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor Nomor 132 Tahun 2022 Tentang Arsitektur Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik Nasional. - Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia, (021), 1–155.,” 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 1, “Interoperabilitas Data Dalam Penyelenggaraan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik dan Satu Data Indonesia. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia.,” 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. M. M. Yusof, A. Papazafeiropoulou, R. J. Paul, and L. K. Stergioulas, “Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems,” Int J Med Inform, vol. 77, no. 6, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. N. Debnath et al., “Digital transformation: A quality model based on iso 25010 and user experience,” in EPiC Series in Computing, 2021. doi: 10.29007/1gnk. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. T. Wulandari, Fadila, and S. Rizal, “ANALISIS LAYANAN BIMBINGAN KONSELING DI RUMAH SAKIT,” Jurnal Muhafadzah: Jurnal Ilmiah Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam, vol. 4, Nov. 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. R. Aryani, “Prototype Sistem Informasi Registrasi Online Puskesmas (SIROP),” Jurnal PROCESSOR, vol. 18, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.33998/processor.2023.18.2.1399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. L. M. Erlirianto, A. H. N. Ali, and A. Herdiyanti, “The Implementation of the Human, Organization, and Technology-Fit (HOT-Fit) Framework to Evaluate the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) System in a Hospital,” in Procedia Computer Science, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. P. Thenata, Suyoto, and A. J. Santoso, “Exploring of the employee information management system using hot-fit and utaut2 model,” Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, vol. 4, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.25046/aj040412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. S. Purwanti and M. R. Fadhilah, “Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Simulasi Bahan Bangunan dengan Pendekatan Lean Development,” vol. 12, 2025, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.unsub.ac.id/index.php/Fasilkom [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. M. D. Mulyawan, I. N. S. Kumara, I. B. A. Swamardika, and K. O. Saputra, “Kualitas Sistem Informasi Berdasarkan ISO/IEC 25010: Literature Review,” Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro, vol. 20, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.24843/mite.2021.v20i01.p02. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. E. E. Sala and A. P. Subriadi, “Hot-Fit Model to Measure the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Information System in Public Sector,” The Winners, vol. 23, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.21512/tw.v23i2.7423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. W. P. Hapsari, U. A. Labib, H. Haryanto, and D. W. Safitri, “A Literature Review of Human, Organization, Technology (HOT) – Fit Evaluation Model,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 2021. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210326.126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pratama and A. B. Mutiara, “Software Quality Analysis for Halodoc Application using ISO 25010:2011,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 12, no. 8, 2021, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120844. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chaerulina and A. Miftahuddin, “Inovasi dan Tantangan dalam Sistem Informasi Manajemen: Perspektif Multidimensional di Berbagai Sektor-Anya Chaerulina, Asep Miftahuddin,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384867049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. D. A. Suryadi and E. Sulistiyani, “Evaluation of Information Quality Using ISO/IEC 25010:2011 (Case Research: Menu Harianku Application),” International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System, vol. 6, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update,” in Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yuliusman, W. E. Putra, D. Setiawan, S. Indrawijaya, I. Jaya, and L. E. Fitri, “Evaluation of utilization of information systems in jambi university perspective human organization technology (Hot) – fit framework,” International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, vol. 24, no. 8, 2020, doi: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I8/PR280246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. J. Morton and M. H. Johnson, “CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition,” Psychol Rev, vol. 98, no. 2, 1991, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Febriana Suhriani and Abdurakhman, “Pendekatan Sem Berbasis Komponen Menggunakan Generalised Structured Component Analysis (GSCA),” Jurnal Sains Matematika dan Statistika, vol. 5, no. 2, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. H. Hwang, Y. Takane, and K. Jung, “Generalized structured component analysis with uniqueness terms for accommodating measurement error,” Front Psychol, vol. 8, no. DEC, 2017, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. S. Kim, R. Cardwell, and H. Hwang, “Using R Package gesca for generalized structured component analysis,” Behaviormetrika, vol. 44, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s41237-016-0002-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Erwin and A. Wijaya, “Penggunaan Model DeLone Dan McLean Dalam Mengukur Kesuksesan Aplikasi Go-Jek Di Palembang,” JURNAL SISTEM & TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI KOMUNIKASI, vol. 3, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. R. Nadir, dan Tawakkal, P. Negeri Ujung Pandang, and K. Km, “Model Kesuksesan Ssistem Informasi Delone & Mclean Terhadap Sistem Informasi Pemerintah Daerah (SIPD) Pada Pemda Kabupaten Wajo,” Seminar Nasional Terapan Riset Inovatif (SENTRINOV) Ke-9, vol. 9, no. 2, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. L. S. Wara, L. Kalangi, and H. Gamaliel, “Pengujian Model Kesuksesan Sistem Informasi Delone dan Mclean pada Sistem Aplikasi Pemeriksaan (SIAP) di Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia,” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing “GOODWILL,” vol. 12, no. 1, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Tawar, A. F. Santoso, and Y. S. Salma, “Model HOT FIT dalam Manajemen Sistem Informasi,” Bincang Sains dan Teknologi, vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 76–82, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.56741/bst.v1i02.144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Z. Ardi, C. Eseadi, E. Yuniarti, F. M. Yendi, and A. W. Murni, “Potential Benefits of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Local Wisdom and Online Counseling for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorders, and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in College Adolescent Girls,” Univers J Public Health, vol. 12, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.13189/ujph.2024.120101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. ISO/IEC 25010. (2011). Systems and software engineering — Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — System and software quality models. International Organization for Standardization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Hwang, H., & Takane, Y. (2004). Generalized structured component analysis. Psychometrika, 69(1), 81–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., et al. (2019). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles