Writers’ Block in Academic Writing: A Systematic Literature Review of Types, Causes & Intervention

Writer’s block is a common issue in academic writing that has implications on productivity, quality of writing, and dissemination of research in educational settings and fields. Writer’s block is a common condition that has long attracted scholars’ attention; however, the literature on writer’s block continues to be fragmented, with little integration of its types, etiology, and treatment. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to synthesise and critically evaluate the extant research on academic writer's block with reference to how it has been conceptualised, its causes, as well as ways in which it can be diagnosed and treated. According to the PRISMA protocol,  a structured search was performed through two of the prominent academic databases: Web of Science and Scopus. We used a Boolean operator to search for additional articles, which included clusters of three keywords: types of writers’ block, causes of writers’ block, and identification and intervention of writers’ block. After predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, screening and eligibility process, we identified 21 articles for the final analysis. The results suggest that academic writer’s block is a multidimensional category consisting of cognitive, linguistic, affective, and motivational dimensions that engage with contextual issues that rarely function in isolation. The reasons are invariably associated with poor academic writing skills, cognitive overload, anxiety, fear of assessment judgment, institutional demands, and a lack of instruction. Among the intervention strategies found in the literature are structured writing support, prewriting and cognitive-behavioral methods, peer- and supervisor involvement, as well as increased use of technical and IT-based tools for idea generation (i.e., mindmaps) and to aid in text production management. The review suggests the importance of looking to intervention as well as preventive or supportive approaches for managing writer's block in academic settings. By integrating sparse evidence into an integrative framework, the review aims to deepen comprehension of writer’s block and offer relevant considerations for educational practice and academic  support systems, including guidelines for future research.

writer’s block, academic writing challenges, cognitive and affective factors

1. Abdel Latif, M. M. M., Alghizzi, T. M., & Alshahrani, T. M. (2025). Teacher motivational strategies in Saudi university EFL writing classes: a qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1483456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abouzahra, A., Sabraoui, A., & Afdel.K. (2020). Model composition in Model Driven Engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 125(106316). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmed, S. J., & Güss, C. D. (2022). An Analysis of Writer’s Block: Causes and Solutions. Creativity Research Journal, 34(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2031436 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aydin, A., Yürük, S. E., Reisoglu, I., & Goktas, Y. (2023). Main barriers and possible enablers of academicians while publishing. SCIENTOMETRICS, 128(1), 623–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04528-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bastug, M., Ertem, I. S., & Keskin, H. K. (2017). A phenomenological research study on writer’s block: causes, processes, and results. EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 59(6), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2016-0169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Beccone, S. (2020). Creative thinking and insight problem-solving in Keats’ “When I have fears ...” COGENT ARTS & HUMANITIES, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1760186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bojner-Horwitz, E. B., Stenfors, C., & Osika, W. (2018). Writer’s block revisited a micro-phenomenological case study on the blocking influence of an internalized voice. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(3–4), 9–28. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044474746&partnerID=40&md5=2111e6d391fbc01d77d6b8248d64f740 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chubko, N. (2025). Fear of a Blank Page: Discovering My Writing Superpowers in a Two-Day Pomodoro Writing Workshop. In Cultivating Wellbeing and Community through Writing in Academia: Shifting the Culture with Shut Up & Write! (pp. 198–208). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003633334-20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dix, H. (2020). From Writer’s Block to Extended Plot: Career Construction Theory and Lives in Writing. LIFE WRITING, 17(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484528.2018.1429772 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dovidio, J. F. (2023). Writing the Paper. In A. L. Nichols & J. E. Edlund (Eds.), CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH METHODS AND STATISTICS FOR THE SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, VOL. 1: Building a Program of Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009010054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Enriquez, G., & Vaughan, A. (2024). Exploring Writer’s Block as Embodied Experience Across the Grades. Teachers College Record, 126(10), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681241305997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Evdash, V. M., & Zhuravleva, N. N. (2020). Strategies for Overcoming University Researchers’ Writer’s Block. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 29(7), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-7-80-88 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gimeno-Ballester, V., & Trigo-Vicente, C. (2024). [Translated article] The role of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: perspectives from hospital pharmacy. FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA, 48(5), T246–T251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2024.07.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gülay, E., & Ungan, S. (2022). Development of academic writing block scale (Awbs): A validity and reliability study. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.35.9.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Horwitz, E. B., Stenfors, C., & Osika, W. (2018). Writer’s block revisited a micro-phenomenological case study on the blocking influence of an internalized voice. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(3–4), 9–28. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044474746&partnerID=40&md5=2111e6d391fbc01d77d6b8248d64f740 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Know Yourself as a Writer. (2023). In Write More, Publish More, Stress Less!: Five Key Principles For A Creative And Sustainable Scholarly Practice (pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003448839-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Martins Garcia, B. (2023). Don’t face writer’s block alone. ELife, 12. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.92931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, A. D. (2009). PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram. In The PRISMA statement (Vol. 6, p. 1000097). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Moore, M. (2018). Articulate walls: writer’s block and the academic creative. New Writing, 15(3), 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2017.1384025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nurkamto, J., Prihandoko, L. A., Primasita, F. A., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Purwati, O. (2024). A PLS-SEM analysis of the factors behind writer’s block of EFL university students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i1.70234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rosa, J. P. O. D., & Genuino, C. F. (2018). Correlating writer’s block and ESL learners’ writing quality. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 604–612. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rose, M. (2009). Writer’s block: The cognitive dimension. In Writer’s Block: The Cognitive Dimension. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011772024&partnerID=40&md5=94e184acc4c22f56ed07d2dd70560236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Schantong, B., Siegmund, N., & Siegmund, J. (2024). Toward a theory on programmer’s block inspired by writer’s block. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10542-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wise, T. A., & Kenett, Y. N. (2024). Sparking creativity: Encouraging creative idea generation through automatically generated word recommendations. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 56(7), 7939–7962. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02463-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Xu, J., Yang, J., & Chen, Z. (2026). Writer’s block in continuation task: Construct, causes, and link with task performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2026.2613820 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Yeung, A. W. K. (2024). Is Citation Count a Legitimate Indicator of Scientific Impact? A Case Study of Upper (1974) “The Unsuccessful Self-Treatment of a Case of Writer’s Block” and Its Derivatives. PUBLICATIONS, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications12040035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar