Sense of Belonging and Autonomous Learning Ability as Determinants to Students’ Engagement
Authors
Department of Education, Senior High School Students (Philippines)
Department of Education, Senior High School Students (Philippines)
Department of Education, Senior High School Students (Philippines)
Department of Education, Senior High School Students (Philippines)
Department of Education, Senior High School Students (Philippines)
Department of Education, Senior High School Students (Philippines)
Department of Education, Senior High School Students (Philippines)
Department of Education, Senior High School Students (Philippines)
Department of Education, Senior High School Students (Philippines)
Department of Education, Senior High School Teacher, Division of Davao de Oro (Philippines)
Department of Education, Senior High School Teacher, Division of Davao de Oro (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200276
Subject Category: Social Studies
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 3804-3815
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-21
Accepted: 2026-02-26
Published: 2026-03-06
Abstract
The research studied how sense of belonging and autonomous learning ability impact student engagement at Lorenzo S. Sarmiento Sr. National High School. The study measured engagement through the two factors which predict engagement through sense of belonging and autonomous learning ability. The research included 134 students who were studied through a quantitative-correlational design. The researchers used mean values together with Pearson r and multiple regression analysis to conduct their study. The results demonstrated that students established their strongest sense of belonging through three social connections which included peer connections and teacher support and school community experiences. Students demonstrated their ability to learn independently through their capacity to establish goals and which tasks to concentrate on and how to measure their progress. Students showed high engagement through their active participation and emotional involvement and mental concentration. The study showed strong positive relationships between sense of belonging and engagement and between autonomous learning ability and engagement which resulted in the null hypotheses being rejected. Students believed that all elements of sense of belonging and autonomous learning ability which they possessed were important elements which determined their level of engagement with others. Educators need to develop students' skills in belonging and autonomous learning to generate active participation which will lead to better results.
Keywords
Caregiving, Sense of Belonging, Autonomous Learning Ability, Students
Downloads
References
1. Allen, J. M. (2022). Sense of belonging as a predictor of college student persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 24(1), 169-185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alonso-Tapia, J., & Panadero, E. (2021). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Baumeister, R. F. (2021). The need to belong: A fundamental human motivation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(2), 137-142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bond, M. (2021). Schools and emergency remote education: A student engagement perspective. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Eklund, L. (2022). Achievement emotions and student engagement in higher education. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 162–178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Briones, M. R., Prudente, M., & Errabo, D. (2023). Characteristics of Filipino online learners: A survey of science education students' online learning experiences. Philippine Journal of Science Education, 52(1), 12-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cabrejas, E. J., & Mendoza, J. (2023). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance of university students in a hybrid learning environment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 74, 102148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cabarle, K. J., & Alburo, K. J. (2023). Difficulties and coping mechanisms of students in modular distance learning: A case study. Ascendens Asia Singapore – Union Christian College Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 5(1), 51. https://journal.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/aasghmra/article/view/10041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Cebelleros, G. C. (2024). Learning Environment and Teacher Communication Behavior as Determinants of Student Engagement. American Journal of Education and Technology, 3(4), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Chen, A., Garcia, R., & Smith, L. (2023). Multidimensional sense of belonging in higher education contexts. The Review of Higher Education, 47(2), 201-225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/cre swell.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Cullantes, S. J., Lim, L. J., & Tan, A. M. (2024). selfregulated learning among university students in a flexible learning setup. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(4), 1198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2021). Teaching and researching motivation (3rd ed.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Esperon, E. J. M., Pangilinan, J. M., Bueno, M. S. F., Casuga, P. J. M., Nones, K. L. C., & Esperon, M. M. (2023). Selfregulated learning skills and learning satisfaction of senior high school students in the new normal education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Fredricks, J. A. (2020). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 11-37). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2021). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of EducationaResearch, 74(1), 59–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. García, M. J., & Rodríguez, A. (2023). Faculty support and student engagement: Addressing diverse social needs in higher education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 234-248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ge, W., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Zheng, H., He, W., Wang, P., Zhu, Q., & Wang, B. (2025). SRLAgent: Enhancing self-regulated learning skills through gamification and LLM assistance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2022). The affective dimension of student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 17-195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Little, D. (2021). Learner autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility. In P. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 45-58). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2021). New developments in goal setting and task performance. American Psychologist, 76(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Miller, D. T. (2022). Teacher care and student motivation: Pathways to engagement and success. Educational Researcher, 51(3), 189-201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Montecillo, G. L., et al. (2024). Peer relationships, sense of belonging, and academic engagement in high school. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Nguyen, T. T., & Yang, H. (2023). The role of learning purpose in fostering student engagement: A mixed-methods investigation. Educational Psychology, 43(5), 456-472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Pan, X., & Yao, Y. (2023). Enhancing Chinese students’ academic engagement: The effect of teacher support and teacher–student rapport. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1188507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Pintrich, P. R. (2022). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 1-18). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Quinlan, K. M., Jerrim, J., & Marks, R. (2021). The role of emotions in student learning and engagement: Insights from psychology and education. Oxford Revie of Education 47(6), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Sarona-Pedro, J. M., & Villanueva, B. R. (2025). The impact of classroom management on student engagement and academic performance in secondary schools. Educational Psychologist, 60(2), 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2025.2038742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Shi, T., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). The role of social support in promoting college students’ engagement during COVID-19 online learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 71, 102148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Suan, N., & Magallanes, M. (2020). School as a second home: Sense of belongingness and self-esteem among high school students in Catholic institutions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1481–1500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Tomaszewski, W., Xiang, N., & Huang, Y. (2023). School climate, student engagement and academic achievement across school sectors in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51, 667–695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Valdez, E. S., & Gomes, L. (2024). Self-regulated learning and persistence in online learning environments among high school students. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Villarreal, O. A. (2021). The impact of social integration on student engagement in online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106611. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Widiastuti, N., Sulistiyani, A. T., & Hidayat, R. (2020). The effect of classroom environment on student engagement in learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(1), 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Widodo, A., Riswanto, A., & Suryadi, D. (2022). Social belonging and academic performance: Evidence from Indonesian students. International Journal of Educational Development, 88, 102523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Widodo, A., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Riswanto, A. (2022). Autonomous learning and its impact on academic achievement and productivity in higher education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Xaypanya, V., Norouzi, S., & Mirzaei, A. (2017). Challenges in learning English as a foreign language: A case study of Lao students. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(12), 123-134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Influence of Korean Drama to Cultural Identity of Students in One Private School
- Children’s Vulnerability in Coastal Slums during Cyclone: A Case Study of Puri Municipality Area
- Mitigating Youth Restiveness Through Social Studies Education: Implications for Institutional Stability, Civic Responsibility, and Student Empowerment in Nigeria
- Students’ Awareness of Sexual Harassment Forms at Campus II, University of Labor and Social Affairs
- Influence of Social Studies Curriculum Content on Youth Restiveness and Civic Responsibility Among Secondary School Students in Nigeria