School Learning Environment and Time Management Skills and Practices of Student Engagement of Senior High School Student in Computer System Servicing

This study examined the relationship between the school learning environment, time management skills and practices, and student engagement of Senior High School students in the Computer System Servicing (CSS) strand. The purpose of this research was to determine how the learning environment and students’ ability to manage their time influenced their level of engagement in academic activities. A quantitative research design was employed, and data were collected using a survey questionnaire administered to selected Senior High School CSS students. The gathered data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tools to identify the relationship among the variables. The results showed that the school learning environment and time management skills and practices were significantly related to student engagement, suggesting that students were more likely to participate actively and remain focused when they experienced a supportive learning environment and effectively managed their time. The study concluded that enhancing the school learning environment and strengthening students’ time management skills could positively affect student engagement. The findings of this study served as a basis for school administrators, teachers, and students in developing strategies and interventions aimed at improving learning experiences and academic involvement among Senior High School students.

Computer System Servicing, school learning environment

1. Aeon, B., & Aguinis, H. (2021). It’s about time: New perspectives and insights on time management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 203–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2020). Assessment and classroom learning: The role of formative assessment. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2020). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 49(2), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2020). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 49(2), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2022). A meta-analytic review of the motivational antecedents of academic engagement. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 523–556. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Curtis, E. A., Comiskey, C., & Dempsey, O. (2020). Importance and use of correlational research. Nurse Researcher, 27(1), 20–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Datu, J. A. D. (2021). Flourishing is associated with higher academic engagement and achievement among Filipino secondary school students. School Psychology International, 42(4), 397–414. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2022). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2022). Student engagement: A contemporary overview. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 3rd Edition, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Garcia, J. L., & Morales, K. P. (2022). Classroom climate and academic engagement among senior high school students in Central Luzon. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 412–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Häfner, A., Stock, A., & Oberst, V. (2020). Decreasing students’ stress through time management training: An intervention study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(2), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Häfner, A., Stock, A., & Oberst, V. (2020). Decreasing students’ stress through time management training: An intervention study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(2), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Israel, G. D. (2013). Determining sample size (PEOD6). University of Florida IFAS Extension. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/PD006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2020). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kahu, E. R. (2020). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 45(5), 1039–1052. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kim, D. (2021). Student engagement in vocational education: A Korean secondary school perspective. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 73(4), 569–586. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Llanos, R. S. (2020). Academic engagement of senior high school students in Region XI: Basis for intervention program. Philippine Social Science Journal, 3(2), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lopez, M. R. (2021). Time management behaviors and academic performance of senior high school students in Iloilo City. Philippine Journal of Educational Measurement, 11(1), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Magno, C. (2020). Self-regulation, time management, and academic achievement of Filipino adolescents. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(3), 239–247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Martin, A. J. (2020). Academic buoyancy and engagement in secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 765–780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2022). Teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement: The roles of teacher support and care. Educational Psychology, 42(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2022). Teacher–student relationships and student engagement: The roles of support and trust. Educational Psychology, 42(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2022). Teacher–student relationships and student engagement: The roles of support and trust. Educational Psychology, 42(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Panadero, E. (2020). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Privitera, G. J. (2022). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ramirez, P. D. (2021). Learning engagement among technical–vocational senior high school students in Davao de Oro. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(6), 112–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Reeve, J. (2021). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 181–196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching and student engagement: A review of empirical findings. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2020). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 3rd Edition, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Reyes, M. L. (2022). Student engagement challenges among Filipino senior high school learners. Philippine Journal of Education Studies, 14(2), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., & Oort, F. J. (2020). Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 49(4), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Santos, G. R., & Rivera, L. M. (2022). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic engagement of senior high school students in Baguio City. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 345–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Schindler, L. A., Poliakova, N., & Yang, H. (2021). The effects of technology integration on student engagement: A critical review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 1–24.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data collection methods and tools for research: A step-by-step guide. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 10(1), 10–38.*. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Trueman, M., & Hartley, J. (2022). A comparison between the time-management skills and academic performance of mature and traditional-entry university students. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), 1–15.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Trueman, M., & Hartley, J. (2022). A comparison between the time-management skills and academic performance of mature and traditional-entry university students. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Villanueva, A. C. (2023). Classroom environment and student participation in Philippine senior high school TVL tracks. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 11(1), 78–89.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2021). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 1–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2021). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 1–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar