Voices from the Classroom: A Phenomenological Study on the Instructional Practices of Senior High School Mathematics Teachers

Authors

Roel E. Lasalita

Special Science Teacher I, Kananga National High School Kananga, Leyte (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0119

Subject Category: Mathematics

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 1371-1379

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-23

Accepted: 2026-02-28

Published: 2026-03-10

Abstract

Mathematics education has increasingly emphasized student-centered and inclusive instructional practices that promote critical thinking, problem-solving, and meaningful learning. In this context, teachers play a vital role in translating these principles into effective classroom instruction. This study explored the instructional experiences, challenges, and adaptive strategies of Senior High School Mathematics teachers at Kananga National High School–Senior High School during the School Year 2025–2026. Using a phenomenological research design, the study aimed to capture teachers' lived experiences of implementing their instructional methods in real classroom settings. Three Senior High School Mathematics teachers were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis. The findings revealed three major dimensions of teachers’ instructional practice: experiences, challenges, and adaptations. Teachers reported diverse learner needs, the importance of student-centered instruction, effective communication, and differentiated strategies as key aspects of their teaching experience. However, they also encountered challenges such as persistent student disengagement, teacher anxiety during lesson delivery or observations, and the complexity of designing inclusive lessons for diverse learners. In response, teachers demonstrated adaptive strategies, including flexible application of strategies, continuous self-development and preparation, and relationship-building with students through empathy and supportive classroom management. The study highlights that effective mathematics instruction extends beyond content knowledge and involves responsiveness, reflective practice, and relational competence. These findings underscore the importance of professional development, institutional support, and teacher preparation programs that strengthen teachers’ capacity to implement adaptive, student-centered teaching practices in diverse Senior High School classrooms.

Keywords

Mathematics instruction, phenomenology, teacher experiences, student-centered strategies

Downloads

References

1. Aguhayon, B., Tingson, R., & Pentang, R. (2023). Differentiated instruction in Philippine Senior High School mathematics classrooms: Enhancing engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 15(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1234/jerp.2023.15245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, L. W. (2016). Improving classroom instruction: Strategies and techniques for cognitively demanding subjects. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Britwum, A., Ntow, F., & Smith, J. (2024). Inquiry-based learning and growth mindset in mathematics classrooms: Evidence from West African secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Studies, 22(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijes.2024.2215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Derakhshan, A., Coombe, C., Zhaleh, K., & Tabatabaee, F. (2021). Teacher clarity and its impact on student engagement and achievement in mathematics instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1431–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09625-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2019). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of existing instruments and approaches. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gningue, S., Peach, P., & Schroder, R. (2013). Learner-centered instruction in mathematics: Promoting engagement and participation. Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 14–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ignacio, M., & Bajet, R. (2022). Student-centered mathematics instruction in Philippine public high schools: Challenges and opportunities. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2017). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 345–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669821 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, R. R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 27, 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Stockero, S., Blume, G., Hines, E., & West, J. (2025). Responsive teaching in mathematics classrooms: Leveraging student thinking for instructional decision-making. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 37(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00421-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2017). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles