Eurocentrism to Global Multilateralism: Empirical Literature Review of the Metamorphosis of Modern International Law

The development of international law was a long standing historical process which was influenced mainly by European intellectual traditions, political interests and expansions of empires. The principles of sovereignty, territoriality, diplomacy and state behavior have been determined since centuries in a perspective of European powers which enjoyed a disproportionate power in the international matters. The period after 1945 has however ushered in fundamental developments such as decolonisation, increasing global interdependence, and the expansion of international institutions brought a more inclusive multilateral order. This article is an empirical literature based evaluation of the effect of the move to a Eurocentric to a multilateral international system on the evolution of the contemporary international law. The work based on the contributions of the academic literature, assesses the transformation of the law making processes, human rights norms, trade regimes, dispute settlement structures and customary international law. The review concludes that modern international law has become much more universal, participatory, and normatively varied but still structural imbalances based on the fact that Eurocentrism are present. The change, thus, is indeed significant yet not final, it represents a changing legal order of the world, instead of complete eradication of inequalities of the past.

Eurocentrism, Multilateralism, Decolonisation, Globalisation

1. Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Berman, H. J. (2017). Law and revolution: The formation of the Western legal tradition. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Charney, J. I. (1993). The new law of the sea: UNCLOS and modern state practice. American Journal of International Law, 87(2), 420–437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal human rights in theory and practice. Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., & Stewart, R. B. (2005). The emergence of global administrative law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 68(3–4), 15–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Orakhelashvili, A. (2010). Peremptory norms in international law. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Shaw, M. N. (2017). International law (8th ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Statute of the International Court of Justice, Article 38. (1945). United Nations Treaty Series, 993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.