Fostering Civic Responsibility Through an Environmental Awareness Study on Littering in Malaysia
Authors
Industrial Design, Faculty of Art & Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) (Malaysia)
Industrial Design, Faculty of Art & Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) (Malaysia)
Interior Design, Faculty of Design and Creative Industry, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta (Indonesia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200370
Subject Category: Environment
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 5003-5011
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-25
Accepted: 2026-03-02
Published: 2026-03-11
Abstract
This study explores how environmental education and public engagement foster civic responsibility and influence littering behaviour in Malaysia. Using a mixed-methods approach combining surveys (n = 43) and observations, findings show moderate awareness but limited understanding of long-term ecological impacts. Social media, formal education, and gamified learning emerged as complementary tools for promoting civic-minded behaviour. Integrating educational, behavioural, and design perspectives, the study contributes to Design for Behaviour Change (DfBC) and Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), highlighting the value of multi-platform environmental education and community participation in creating cleaner, more sustainable urban environments.
Keywords
Environmental Education; Civic Responsibility; Design for Behaviour Change
Downloads
References
1. Abd Rahman, N., Mohamad, S., & Yusof, R. (2024). Public environmental awareness and behaviour towards sustainable waste management in Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Studies, 12 (3), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ahmad, N., Rahim, F., & Aziz, N. (2023). National survey on plastic pollution and recycling habits in Malaysia. Malaysian Environmental Review, 18 (2), 33–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behaviour: Frequently asked questions. Human Behaviour and Emerging Technologies, 2 (4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Asmui, M. (2017). Civic behaviour and public cleanliness: Understanding Malaysia’s littering culture. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (1), 25–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Asokan Vasudevan, M. S., Che Rusuli, A., & Amira Ab Rahman, N. (2024). Cultivation of green environmental awareness towards cleanliness city in Malaysia. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8 (12), 6213. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.6213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bansal, H. (2021). Gamification for environmental education: A tool for sustainable behaviour. International Journal of Learning Innovation, 9 (4), 121–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bryman, A. (2023). Social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Check, J., & Schutt, R. K. (2022). Research methods in education and social sciences (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chong, W. Y., Lim, S. P., & Wong, J. H. (2024). Digital activism and environmental campaigns: Social media engagement trends in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 10 (1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2022). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Etikan, I. (2023). Sampling methods in social research: Applications and limitations. Journal of Research Design, 7 (1), 12–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2023). The art of integration in mixed methods research: A methodological framework. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17 (2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Finnie, W. C. (1973). Field experiments in litter control. Environment and Behavior, 5 (2), 123–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Khatib, N. (2022). Gamification and behavioural change: A framework for sustainable engagement. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 14 (3), 87–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Latha, R., & Suresh, P. (2020). Gamified environmental learning for youth engagement. International Journal of Environmental Education, 8 (2), 56–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Lye, C. T. (2024). The role of general and specific pro-environmental education in household waste management in Malaysia: Evidence from quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Studies and Policies. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010024000994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mas’udah, S., Aziz, N., & Wahab, Z. (2021). Behavioural determinants of urban littering: A Malaysian case study. Malaysian Journal of Urban Studies, 6 (1), 72–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mohamad, S. (2014). Attitude and behaviour toward environmental responsibility among Malaysians. Malaysian Journal of Psychology, 3 (1), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Nasir, M. A., & Hamzah, N. (2023). Challenges in integrating environmental education in Malaysian schools. Education for Sustainability Review, 9 (2), 44–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ouariachi, T., Li, Y., & Elving, W. J. (2019). Gamification in communication for social change: Lessons learned from an environmental initiative. International Journal of Communication, 13, 2230–2251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Pink, S., Horst, H., & Lewis, T. (2023). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ramsey, J. M., & Hungerford, H. R. (1989). The effects of issue investigation and action training on environmental behaviour in seventh-grade students. Journal of Environmental Education, 20 (3), 29–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Stapp, W. B., Bennett, D., Bryan, W., Fulton, J., MacGregor, J., Nowak, P., & Swan, J. (1969). The concept of environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 1 (1), 30–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. UNESCO. (2023). Education for sustainable development: Building green communities. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. UNESCO. (2024). What you need to know about education for sustainable development. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/education-sustainable-development/need-know [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Wu, J., Chien, S., & Lin, T. (2018). Social media and environmental engagement: The double-edged influence of viral campaigns. Journal of Environmental Communication, 12 (4), 456–470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
- Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
- Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
- Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area