Gender, Women and Community Environmental Education for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Rural Madagascar

Objective : This article examines the links between gender, community-based environmental education, and sustainable development through a concrete case study in a rural community in Madagascar. It focuses on the role and participation of women, building on the work of Mukoni (2015), Momsen (2004, 2007), and Dankelman (2002, 2012).
Method : The study is based on qualitative field research conducted with 150 participants across ten rural localities in Madagascar. Data were collected through 120 semi-structured interviews with rural women, ten focus group discussions, and field observations. The analysis draws on the theoretical framework of feminist political ecology and the Gender and Development (GAD) approach.
Results : The findings show that, in line with observations by Kraub (2011) and UNEP (2008), women play a central role in the daily management of natural resources and food security, yet remain marginalized in formal community-based environmental education initiatives. However, when women are genuinely included, environmental education strengthens their adaptive capacities in the face of environmental change (Sen, cited in Elliot, 2007), enhances the recognition of women’s local knowledge, and improves community practices for the sustainable management of natural resources.
Conclusion : The article concludes that sustainable development in rural Malagasy communities cannot be achieved without meaningful consideration of gender and the active participation of women in community-based environmental education. In line with Agenda 21 (UNEP, 1992) and UNESCO guidelines (2004), it recommends the implementation of gender-sensitive programs aimed at reducing inequalities in access to information, resources, and decision-making.

Gender, Women and Community, Environmental Education

1. ADEA – Association for the Development of Education in Africa (2006). Information Bulletin: Special Issue – Biennale 2006, ADEA, Paris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agarwal, B. (1997). “The Gender and Environment Debate,” in Roger, K., Bell, D.V.J., Penz, P., and Fawcett, L. (eds.), Political Ecology: Global and Local, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 189–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braidotti, R., Charkiewicz, E., Hausler, S., and Wierenga, S. (1994). Women, the Environment and Sustainable Development: Towards a Theoretical Synthesis, Zed Books, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dankelman, I. (2002). Gender, Environment and Sustainable Development: Understanding the Linkages, Royal Tropical Institute, Oxfam, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dankelman, I. (2012). “On the Road to Sustainable Development: Promoting Gender Equality and Responding to Climate Change,” in UNDP (ed.), Powerful Synergies: Gender Equality, Economic Development and Environmental Sustainability, Graphic Service Bureau Inc., New York, pp. 25–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Elliot, J. (2007). “From Human Capital Theory to the Capability Approach as a Driver of Development,” in Somekh, B. and Schwandt, T. (eds.), Knowledge Production: Research in Times of Transformation, Routledge, London, pp. 142–165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ericksen, P.J., Ingram, J.S.I., and Liverman, D.M. (2009). Food Security and Global Environmental Change: Emerging Challenges, Elsevier Ltd., Oxford. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Howard, P. (2003). Women and Plants: Gender Relations in Biodiversity Management and Conservation, Zed Books, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jewitt, S. (2002). Environment, Knowledge and Gender: Local Development in India, Ashgate, Aldershot. 10. Kasama (2008). “Gender Perspectives on Climate Change and Disaster Risk Reduction,” available at: http://cpcabrisbane.org/Kasama/2008/v22n2/womenInpolitics.htm (accessed 28 October 2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Khaledi, K., Agahi, H., and Eskandari, F. (2012). “Explaining Rural Women’s Participation in Environmental Education Programs: A Case Study,” Journal of Educational Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 57–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kraub, J. (2011). Gender and Climate Change: Gender Experiences from Climate-Related Projects, GIZ, Bonn and Eschborn. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mamphele, M. (2004). “Women and Indigenous Knowledge: Building Bridges between the Traditional and the Modern,” available at: http://www.worldbank.org/afr/ik/ikcomplete.pdf (accessed 12 October 2012). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Misiaszek, G.W. (2011). Ecopedagogy in the Age of Globalization (Doctoral dissertation), ProQuest LLC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mogotsi, K., Nyangito, M.M., and Nyariki, D.M. (2011). “Constraints Limiting Agro-Pastoral Communities’ Adaptation to Drought,” African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 168–177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Momsen, J.H.C. (2004). Gender and Development, Routledge, London and New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Momsen, J. (2007). “Gender and Agrobiodiversity: An Introduction,” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, vol. 28, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mukoni, M. (2015). Gender, Community-Based Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, International Journal of Development and Sustainability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rocheleau, D. (1995). “Gender and Biodiversity: A Feminist Political Ecology Perspective,” IDS Bulletin, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 9–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B., and Wangari, E. (eds.) (1996). Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences, Routledge, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sen, A., cited in Elliot, J. (2007). “The Capability Approach and Development,” in Knowledge Production, Routledge, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Shumba, O., Kasambe, R., Mukundu, C., and Muzenda, C. (2008). “Environmental Education and Sustainability in a Context of Poverty,” South African Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 23, pp. 81–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. SIDA – Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (2005). SIDA Policy: Promoting Gender Equality in Development Cooperation, Stockholm. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tilbury, D. (2010). Education for Sustainable Development: An Expert Review of Processes and Learning, UNESCO, Paris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. UNEP (1992a). Agenda 21, United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. UNEP (1992b). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. UNEP (2008). Freshwater Resources in Africa: Water and Natural Resource Management, United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. UNESCO (1978). “Tbilisi Declaration,” Connect, vol. III, no. 1, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. UNESCO (2004). Global Monitoring Report on Education for All, UNESCO, Paris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wals, A.E., and Keift, D. (2010). Research on Education for Sustainable Development: An Overview, Sida Edita, Sweden. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
• Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
• Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
• Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area