A Multi-Layered Governance Framework for AML/CFT Resilience: A Narrative Review of Challenges and Effectiveness in Malaysia

The global fight against money laundering and terrorist financing (AML/CFT) faces escalating challenges from digital assets, offshore finance, and increasingly sophisticated criminal networks. For jurisdictions such as Malaysia, a dynamic financial hub with significant Islamic finance and offshore sectors, these evolving threats intersect with governance vulnerabilities, as illustrated by the 1MDB scandal. Beyond compliance concerns, this context raises a broader regulatory governance question: how can AML/CFT systems sustain effectiveness amid institutional complexity, technological disruption, and competing normative demands? This narrative literature review synthesises and critically evaluates scholarly research on Malaysia’s AML/CFT frameworks to move beyond compartmentalised, sector-specific analysis. Drawing on legal, qualitative, and policy-oriented studies, the review integrates six interconnected themes, including the limitations of asset recovery tools, cross-border crypto and offshore risks, the dual role of technology, sector-specific vulnerabilities, systemic governance failures, and tensions between enforcement efficiency and fundamental rights. The analysis finds that regulatory effectiveness is not determined by any single legal or technological instrument. Rather, it emerges from alignment across three interdependent layers: foundational governance architecture, operational enforcement mechanisms, and normative institutional principles. Misalignment across these dimensions generates systemic vulnerability, even where formal compliance structures exist. The study contributes a multi-layered governance alignment model that conceptualises AML/CFT resilience as a dynamic institutional outcome. It calls for synchronised legal, technological, and institutional reform and highlights the need for interdisciplinary empirical research to examine cross-sectoral threat flows and enforcement trade-offs.

Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Counter-Financing Terrorism (CFT), Governance

1. Aish, K., Hassan, M. K., Zaman, Q. U., Ehsan, S., Abbas, K., & Shah, I. H. (2022). Do Islamic banks gain from corruption and money laundering (ML)? Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(3), 585-599. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2021-0094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arsyad, I., Kharisma, D. B., & Wiwoho, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence and Islamic finance industry: Problems and oversight. International Journal of Law and Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-07-2024-0236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chandra, T. Y., Hossain, M. B., Md Nor, M. Z. M., & Abu Taher, M. A. (2024). Economic opportunities of offshore banking and regulatory responses to money laundering risks: A comparative study. Jurnal Hukum, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v40i2.37115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ganesan, T., Zahir, M. Z. M., Hassan, M. S., & Mohd Ali, H. M. (2025). Civil forfeiture under anti-money laundering legislation in Malaysia. International Islamic University Malaysia Law Journal, 31(S1). https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31S1.876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Jones, D. S. (2020). 1MDB corruption scandal in Malaysia: A study of failings in control and accountability. Public Administration and Policy, 23(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-11-2019-0032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kabra, S., & Gori, S. (2025). Combating cryptocurrency laundering by organised crime groups through an effective regulatory framework. International Islamic University Malaysia Law Journal, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v33i1.1007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mohamad, A. A. S., Tajuddin, A. T. M., & Wahid, H. (2025). Risk assessment of money laundering and terrorism financing in the Labuan International Business and Financial Centre. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2025.16.2.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mohamed, N., En, T. K., Sultan, N., Sattar, A., & Latif, H. (2023). Customer protection and money laundering in the era of digital currencies: Are Malaysian regulations enough to combat? Journal of Management and Accounting Research, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.24191/MAR.V22I03-03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nordin, R., Rastegari, B., & Mausavi, S. (2012). Suspicious transactions: An analysis from the perspective of consumers in Malaysia. International Business Management, 6(3), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.3923/ibm.2012.325.332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Raof, N. A., & Mohd-Sulaiman, A. N. (2023). Show me the money! Unexplained wealth and civil forfeiture in Malaysia. International Islamic University Malaysia Law Journal, 31(2), 347-369. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i2.825 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sukumaran, S., Bee, T. S., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2022). Cryptocurrency as an investment: The Malaysian context. Risks, 10(4), Article 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10040086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Yaacob, N. M., & Harun, A. H. (2019). The effectiveness of money laundering regulations: Evidence from the money-services-business industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 6594-6600. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C6454.098319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Correlation of Marketing Strategies and Financial Performance of Motor Parts Businesses in the City of Mati
• The Role of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts in Enhancing Financial Transparency and Efficiency in the Emerging Market
• Exploring Intention among Universiti Teknologi Mara Terengganu Community to Donate into Education Waqf Fund
• Utilizing AHP Method to Rank Preference of Waqf Fund Usage for UiTM Terengganu, Malaysia
• The Influence of Portfolio Diversification on Financial Performance: Evidence from Listed Banks on the Ghana Stock Exchange