Exploring Language Learning Strategies from the Perspective of Reciprocal Determinism

Learning strategies refer to the approaches individuals use to complete learning tasks, which vary according to personal preferences. In learning German, the effective use of these strategies is essential for facilitating the learning process and enhancing students’ performance. Despite increasing interest in language learning strategies, limited studies have examined these strategies within a social-cognitive learning framework in the context of German as a third language in Malaysia, making this study significant in providing empirical and contextual evidence. This study explores language learning strategies from the perspective of reciprocal determinism by examining undergraduate students’ perceptions of the strategies they employ and the interrelationships among these strategies in achieving optimal learning outcomes in learning German at the main campus of Malaysia’s largest public university. This study employed a quantitative approach using a 5-point Likert-scale survey distributed via Google Forms to 164 students enrolled in a third-language German course. It contained four sections, which were rooted in Bandura’s (1978) concept of reciprocal determinism and the learning strategies proposed by Wenden & Rubin (1987). The instruments were divided into three sections, consisting of 42 items with 19 items on Power, 11 items on Affective and 12 items on Affiliation. The findings indicated that students demonstrated strong cognitive and metacognitive engagement, effective affective self-regulation, and appreciation for peer support, although their consistency in study routines and class attendance was limited. These results suggest that language instructors should design learning activities that not only foster cognitive and emotional engagement but also encourage consistent study habits and active participation to maximise students’ learning outcomes in German. These findings highlight the importance of integrating cognitive, affective, and social dimensions in language learning strategies and offer new insights into the application of reciprocal determinism in learning German as a third language in Malaysia, contributing empirical evidence for more effective instructional practices.

Learning Strategies, German Language, Cognitive Components, Metacognitive Self-Regulation and Resource Management, Reciprocal Determinism

1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-Learning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adnan, M. A. M., & Ghazali, Z. (2011) Students’ perceptions of language learning strategy use and self‑efficacy: A study of university students in Peninsular Malaysia). Sarjana Journal, 26, 81–99 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amini, D., Anhari, M. H., & Ghasemzadeh, A. (2020). Modeling the relationship between metacognitive strategy awareness, self‑regulation and reading proficiency of Iranian EFL learners.Cogent Education, 7(1), 1787018. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1787018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amini, M., Anhari, M., & Ghasemzadeh, R. (2020). The role of resource management strategies in self‑regulated learning. Journal of Educational Research, 113(4), 251–263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ali, Z. (2022). 21stcentury learning: Understanding language learning strategies with technology literacy among L2 learners. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(2), 202–220. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anthonysamy, L., Wut, T. M. E., & Lim, O. W. (2025). Metacognitive strategy interventions to improve analytical thinking skills: A quasi-experimental study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bandura, A. (1978). The self-system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.4.344 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fan, N. (2020). Strategy use in second language vocabulary learning and its relationships with the breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: A structural equation modeling study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Griffiths, C., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies. System, 43(1)–10.367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00048-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Habók, A., Magyar, A., & Molnár, G. (2022). Investigating the relationship among English language learning strategies, language achievement, and attitude. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 867714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867714 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hismanoglu, M. (2000). Language learning strategies in foreign language learning and teaching. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(8), 12–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ho, A. P., & Ng, L. L. (2017). Effects of learners’ language proficiency on their language learning strategies. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 6(1), 10–25. Retrieved from https://www.journals.mymla.org/index.php/MJLL/article/view/132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ibrahim, N., Taharuddin, N. S., Yusof, A. M., Nazri, H. M., Sedhu, D. S., Azamri, N. M., ... & Zakaria, M. R. A. (2024). Systematic review on the role of gender and language learning strategies (LLS). Journal of Accounting, Business and Management (JABM), 32(1), 308-320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lee, H. (2023). Effort management and resource utilization in tertiary education. Journal of Self‑Regulated Learning, 8(1), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lestari, M., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2020). Language learning strategies of undergraduate EFL students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Liu, J. (2023). Language learning strategies in second language acquisition. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature, 6(16), 69–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Masbirorotni, M., & Fajaryani, N. (2020). In search of commonly used language learning strategies by EFL students. Indonesian Research Journal in Education (IRJE), 4(1), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v4i1.7990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mohammed, M. A. A., & AbdAlla, M. (2020). English language and globalization. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 7(1), 5–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06367.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rahmat, N.H., & Thasrabiab, T,.(2024) Exploring Motivation and Self-Regulation from the Social Cognitive View. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1), 3276-3290. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2021.112.88.97 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rose, H., Briggs, J. G., Boggs, J. A., Sergio, L., & Ivanova-Slavianskaia, N. (2018). A systematic review of language learner strategy research in the 21st century. Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 151–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rasit, N., & Ismail, Z. (2024). Relationship between motivation and students’ Arabic language learning outcomes in Malaysian religious secondary school. Al‑Azkiyaa ‑ International Journal of Language and Education, 3(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.33102/alazkiyaa93 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Salmona Madriñan, M. (2014). The use of first language in the second‑language classroom: A support for second language acquisition. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 9, 50–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Siregar, R. A., Lengkanawati, N. S., & Damayanti, I. L. (2024). Metacognitive strategies in mediating EFL adult learners’ self‑regulated language learning: A systematic review. LLT Journal: Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(1), 252–272. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i1.5502 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Siregar, R., & Lengkanawati, N. (2021). Help‑seeking behavior and peer support in higher education learning. International Journal of Learning Studies, 10(2), 45–57 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2022). Student engagement and study environment: Challenges and strategies. Education and Learning Review, 15(1), 12–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Self‐regulation and learning. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition, 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Syahputra, I. (2014). Strategi pembelajaran bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa asing dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berbahasa siswa. Kutubkhanah, 17(1), 127–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Teng, M. F. (2023). Language learning strategies. In Z. Wen, R. L. Sparks, A. Biedroń, & M. F. Teng (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language acquisition: Theories, assessment and pedagogy (pp. 147–173). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514749‑008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Vetter, T.R. (2017) Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When, Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wenden A and Rubin J (1987) Learner Strategies in Language Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry‑based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian‑Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862‑020‑00090‑2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Wang, K., Zhang, L. J., & Cooper, M. (2025). Metacognitive instruction for improving the effectiveness of collaborative writing for EFL learners’ writing development. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(2), 661-673. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C.. (202) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zhao, M., Li, T., Yu, Y., Sin, K. F., & Zheng, E. (2025). Metacognitive Strategies and Willingness to Communicate in L2 Learning: A Mediation Model of Self-Efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation. SAGE Open, 15(2), 21582440251340830. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar