The Influence of Confidence and Worry on Fear of Public Speaking: A PLS-SEM Analysis

Authors

Noor Hanim Rahmat

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Sharifah Amani Syed Abdul Rahman

Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)

Mohamad Ridhuan Nasarudin

Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)

Nurmarsya Batrisya Suhar Rezwan

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor Kampus Segamat (Malaysia)

Nur Sherina Zainal Abidin

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor Kampus Segamat (Malaysia)

Nurul Afiqah Yusri

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor Kampus Segamat (Malaysia)

Nur Syazana Arman

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300006

Subject Category: Public speaking

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 81-97

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-04

Accepted: 2026-03-12

Published: 2026-03-24

Abstract

Public speaking anxiety (PSA) is widely recognized as one of the most common fears among university students and can significantly affect academic performance, communication effectiveness, and confidence in learning environments. This study investigates the influence of confidence and worry on fear of public speaking by examining how these psychological factors relate to behavioural and physiological fear responses. Grounded in Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Theory and Self-Efficacy Theory, the study proposes that confidence serves as a protective factor that can reduce fear, whereas worry intensifies anxiety and heightens fear responses during speaking situations. A quantitative research design was employed, involving 446 respondents, and data were collected using a questionnaire adapted from the Public Speaking Anxiety Scale, which included 17 items measuring cognitive (confidence and worry), behavioural, and physiological dimensions of public speaking anxiety. The data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) through SmartPLS 4 to assess both measurement and structural models. The measurement model demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity, with satisfactory values for factor loadings, Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability, and average variance extracted. Structural model results revealed significant relationships between confidence and both behavioural and physiological fear, as well as significant relationships between worry and both fear dimensions. Effect size analysis indicated that confidence had small effects on behavioural and physiological fear, while worry had a small effect on behavioural fear and a medium effect on physiological fear. These findings suggest that although confidence helps mitigate fear-related responses, worry plays a stronger role in intensifying physiological symptoms associated with public speaking anxiety. Overall, the study highlights the importance of strengthening confidence while addressing worry in order to reduce fear of public speaking among students and enhance their communication competence in academic settings.

Keywords

Public Speaking Anxiety, Confidence, Worry, Behavioural Fear, PLS-SEM

Downloads

References

1. Bartholomay, E. M., & Houlihan, D. D. (2016). Public Speaking Anxiety Scale: Preliminary psychometric data and scale validation. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Fornell, C. and Bookstein. F.L. (1982) Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3151718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmed, S. J. (2019). An Analysis of Writer’s Block: Causes, Characteristics, and An Analysis of Writer’s Block: Causes, Characteristics, and Solutions Solutions. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aqso, D., & Rimbano, D. (2023). The Relationship between Self-Confidence and Public Speaking Ability of Students of the Faculty of Education Ahmad Dahlan University Yogyakarta. In Business, Economics & Management for Sustainable Future. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bartholomay, E. M., & Houlihan, D. D. (2016). Public Speaking Anxiety Scale: Preliminary psychometric data and scale validation. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed). Hillsdale, NJ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Eni, N., Warastri, N. T., Ridha Ilhami, M., & Sari, R. (2024). The Influence of Self Cofidence in Public Speaking. Journal of Social Development, 2(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.20527/jsd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fornel, C. and B. F. L. (1982). Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Goodman, S. N. (1999). Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 2: The Bayes factor. Academia and Clinic, 130(12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Grieve, R., Woodley, J., Hunt, S. E., & McKay, A. (2021). Student fears of oral presentations and public speaking in higher education: a qualitative survey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(9), 1281–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1948509 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hair, J. F. , M. L. , M. M. R. L. S. M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hauf, S. , R. N. F. , S. M. , R. C. M. (2024). The Importance and Performance in PLS-SEM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78(2024)(100723). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Merton, R. (1948). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8, 193–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ramayah, T. , Cheak, F., Ting, H., & memon, M. A. (2018). Partial least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using Smart PLS 3.0: An Updated Guide and practical guide to statistical analysis (2nd ed). . Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ringle, C. M. , S. M. (2016). Gain more insights from your PLS-SEM results: The Importance-performance map analysis. . Industrial Management & Data System, 116(9), 1865–1886. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results:The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(9), 1865–1886. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Samsudin, N., Hairi, H. M., Othman, N., Salleh, M. S. M., & Okfalisa. (2025). Exploring Aspects of Public Speaking Anxiety. International Journal of Research and Innovations in Social Sciences, IX, 1443–1456. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ul Huda, N., Bibi, M., Shahid, M. S., Mukhtar, S., & Mukhtar, R. (2024). Stage Fright to Scholarly Flight: The Impact of Public Speaking Anxiety and Fear of Negative Evaluation on Academic Performance in University Students. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 4(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ye, T., Elliott, R., McFarquhar, M., & Mansell, W. (2024). The impact of audience dynamics on public speaking anxiety in virtual scenarios: An online survey. Journal of Affective Disorders, 363, 420–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ziegenfuss, J. Y. , C. A. E. , J. M. D. M. M. J. T. E. K. , M. C. (2021). Impact of Demographic Surevy Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment:A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice, 14(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles