The Crisis of the Decoupled Subject: Embodied Erasure in the Age of Environmental and Digital Abstraction

Contemporary governance and corporate systems increasingly rely on the logic of “decoupling,” the theoretical separation of economic and technological progress from their material and human consequences. This paper argues that such abstraction produces a profound “crisis of the decoupled subject,” where the human being is treated as a manipulable data point rather than a sensing, feeling entity. By synthesizing recent ethnographic analysis of sensory displacement among climate migrants in Bangladesh and quantitative investigations into the affective paradoxes of AI service interactions, this study identifies a parallel mechanism of “embodied erasure” operating across environmental and digital domains. The analysis demonstrates that while systems prioritize “legibility” and quantitative efficiency, human well-being remains stubbornly tethered to sensory richness and affective connection. Drawing on theories of digital damage, solastalgia, and embodied knowing, the paper contends that the privileging of the “machine metaphor” over lived experience systematically undermines human resilience. Ultimately, it calls for a re-entanglement of efficiency with embodiment, proposing that sustainable futures depend on recognizing the moral and sensory primacy of the feeling subject.

Embodied Erasure, Decoupling, Climate Migration, Artificial Intelligence, Affect Theory, Digital Damage, Slow Violence.

1. Albert, M. J. (2020). The dangers of decoupling: earth system crisis and the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’. Global Policy, 11(2), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Athanasiou, A. (2017). States of emergency, modes of emergence: Critical enactments of ‘the people’ in times of crisis. Critical Times in Greece: Anthropological Engagements with the Crisis, 254-276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bissell, D. (2021). Encountering automation: Redefining bodies through stories of technological change. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 39(4), 738-756. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Blackie, M., & Luckett, K. (2025). Embodiment matters in knowledge building. Science & Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bonvino, A. (2025). Interconnection between emotion and cognition: implications for human and environmental well-being [Doctoral dissertation]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Burzagli, L., Emiliani, P. L., & Antona, M. (2022). Intelligent environments for all: a path towards technology-enhanced human well-being. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21, 663-674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Clough, P. T. (2018). The user unconscious: On affect, media, and measure. University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dragojlovic, A., & Broom, A. (2017). Bodies and suffering: Emotions and relations of care. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Edwards, D. W. (2020). Digital rhetoric on a damaged planet: Storying digital damage as inventive response to the Anthropocene. Rhetoric Review, 39(2), 198-212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Edwards, D. (2025). Enduring digital damage: Rhetorical reckonings for planetary survival. University of Alabama Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gill, S. P. (2008). Knowledge as embodied performance. In Cognition, Communication and Interaction (pp. 385-408). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hamilakis, Y. (2017). Sensorial assemblages: affect, memory and temporality in assemblage thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27(1), 169-176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hasan, N. B. (2025). AI Efficiency Versus Human Empathy: A Paradox of AI and Human Agents in Service Support Interactions. Sociology Lens. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.70027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kuntsman, A. (2020). From digital solutionism to materialist accountability: The urgency of new interventions. Journal of Environmental Media, 1(1), 7-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lee, S. (2022). Sustainable embodied experience in the built environment: reinterpreting architectural history through embodied cognition. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 16(2), 268-283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Liu, J., & Sengers, P. (2021). Legibility and the legacy of racialized dispossession in digital agriculture. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mia, M. R. (2025). Riverbank Erosion as Slow Violence: The Sensorial Displacement of Climate Migrants. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 8(9), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i9.2829 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sammler, K. G., & House-Peters, L. (2023). Unblackboxing mediation in the digital mine. Geoforum, 141, 103730. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Shin, Y. (2025). Toward human-centered artificial intelligence for users’ digital well-being: Systematic review, synthesis, and future directions. JMIR Human Factors, 12(1), e60000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tschakert, P. (2012). From impacts to embodied experiences: tracing political ecology in climate change research. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 112(2), 144-156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tschakert, P., Tutu, R., & Alcaro, A. (2013). Embodied experiences of environmental and climatic changes in landscapes of everyday life in Ghana. Emotion, Space and Society, 7, 13-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zarantonello, L., Grappi, S., & Formisano, M. (2024). How technological and natural consumption experiences impact consumer well‐being: The role of consumer mindfulness and fatigue. Psychology & Marketing, 41(3), 612-628. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Exploration of Cosmetic Haircare Practices among Indigenous Women of Nandurbar District