Ethical Dilemmas among Healthcare Workers in Private Hospitals and Their Implications for Organizational Governance and Well-Being: Evidence from Sarawak, Malaysia
Authors
Cawangan Kawalan Amalan Perubatan Swasta (CKAPS), Sarawak State Health Department, Malaysia; Faculty of Law Enforcement and Public Sector Management (FLAME), Saito University College (Malaysia)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-02
Accepted: 2026-03-07
Published: 2026-03-24
Abstract
This study explores the ethical challenges that healthcare professionals experience in private hospitals in Sarawak, Malaysia, and the consequences of these challenges on the professionals' well-being and on the administrative structure of the hospitals. The central focus of this study is to capture the scope and type of ethical challenges that healthcare staff experience in private hospitals, the negative effects of these challenges on personal well-being and the administrative structure of an organization, and the impact of ethical standards and institutional frameworks on the challenges and issues that arise within these complexities.
A cross-sectional, descriptive research design was utilized. Data were collected via an online survey that included a structured questionnaire targeting private hospital workers across Sarawak, Malaysia, including physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, administrators, and support staff. The participants were selected through convenience sampling, and their participation was voluntary and anonymous. Statistical analyses (mainly descriptive and inferential statistics) were conducted to study the interrelationships of ethical challenges, the well-being of healthcare employees, and administrative outcomes.
The analysis shows the frequency of ethical dilemmas being encountered in the daily grind of the individual. Most acts of daily ethical dilemmas in the medical profession include informing a patient to consent to the treatment, how a doctor decides to allocate his services to his patients; is the action of a doctor in the best interests of the patient and does he keep the patients ethical dilemma, and what are the religious beliefs of a patient. Statistically, the more ethical dilemmas a person encounters, the more likely he or she is to experience negative outcomes, a decline in morale, and leaves a job because of lack of satisfaction and professional well-being. In the organizational world, the more ethical dilemmas a person encounters, the weaker the organization's governance is and the more the organization's ethical accountability and the more difficulty the organization has in applying standards to unethical behavior. On the contrary, governance and ethical behavior improves in the presence of ethically clear and unambiguous organizational criteria, social relations and a more ethical presence of organizational systems such as ethical committees and ethical consultations.
In private hospitals, ethical dilemmas are a challenge to the individual professional, and a problem of governance. Strengthening ethical governance to institutional ethical support systems and organizational and regulatory frameworks is a means of maintaining the professional's honor, increasing accountability, and ensuring that private health care is sustainable.
Keywords
healthcare ethics, ethical governance, moral distress
Downloads
References
1. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bell, L. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Critical Care Nurse, 35(4), 72–73. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2015639 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Celis, I. V., & Méndez, C. C. (2019). Moral distress: Sign of ethical issues in the practice of oncology nursing—A literature review. Aquichan, 19(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2019.19.1.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Epstein, E. G., & Delgado, S. (2010). Understanding and addressing moral distress. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15(3), Manuscript 1. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol15No03Man01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Everyday ethics: Ethical issues and stress in nursing practice. (2010). Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(21–22), 3216–3224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05425.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Haddad, L. M., & Geiger, R. A. (2023). Nursing ethical considerations. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526054/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hakimi, H., Mousazadeh, N., Sharif-Nia, H., Nazari, R., & Dehghani, M. (2023). The predictive factors of moral courage among hospital nurses. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 18, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00141-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hamric, A. B., & Blackhall, L. J. (2007). Nurse–physician perspectives on the care of dying patients in intensive care units: Collaboration, moral distress, and ethical climate. Critical Care Medicine, 35(2), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000254722.50608.2D [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Horton, J. (2002). Review of Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.), by T. L. Beauchamp & J. F. Childress. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 96(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90265-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Jonsen, A. R., Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. J. (2015). Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Moral distress among palliative care clinicians: A framework for understanding moral distress. (2013). Journal of Palliative Medicine, 16(9), 1074–1079. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2012.0490 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nursing practice: The ethical issues. (n.d.). Georgetown University Library. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/800986 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Parsa-Parsi, R. W. (2022). The International Code of Medical Ethics of the World Medical Association. JAMA, 328(20), 2011–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.19697 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Quality of primary studies included in systematic reviews: Results of the MetaQuality cross-sectional study. (2005). BMJ, 330, 1053. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38414.515938.8F [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ethical conflict among nurses working in intensive care units. (2019). Nursing Ethics, 26(7–8), 2074–2086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733018796686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ethical issues in the disruptive behaviours of incivility, bullying and horizontal or lateral violence. (2014). Nursing Ethics, 21(1), 39–48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24707670/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
- Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
- The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
- An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
- The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.