From Decision-Maker to Decision Architect: AI-Augmented Leadership in Complex Organisations

Authors

Wynand Goosen

Department of Management, Infomage, Johannesburg, Gauteng (South Africa)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1014MG0057

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/14 | Page No: 720-735

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-02

Accepted: 2026-03-07

Published: 2026-03-25

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded within organisational decision-making processes, transforming how information is generated, analysed, and interpreted. While traditional leadership theories assume that strategic authority rests primarily on human cognition and managerial judgment, the growing integration of intelligent systems creates hybrid environments in which organisational decisions emerge through interactions between human expertise and machine intelligence. This shift challenges conventional understandings of leadership authority and raises important questions about how executives govern AI-enabled decision systems.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, leadership, decision-making, distributed cognition

Downloads

References

1. Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2021). The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(1), 333–372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2017). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning (Rev. and updated ed.). Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), 637–643. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, Article 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dzindolet, M. T., Peterson, S. A., Pomranky, R. A., Pierce, L. G., & Beck, H. P. (2003). The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 697–718. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017). Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature, 542, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. George, G., Haas, M. R., & Pentland, A. (2014). Big data and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 321–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human–AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003). Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(1), 76–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, learning, and assessment. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Pasmore, W., Winby, S., Mohrman, S. A., & Vanasse, R. (2019). Reflections: Sociotechnical systems design and organization change. Journal of Change Management, 19(2), 67–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Topol, E. (2019). Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wilson, H. J., & Daugherty, P. R. (2018). Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Business Review, 96(4), 114–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles