Perception of Male Criminology Students on Female Internship Haircut

This study explored the perceptions of male criminology students regarding the “boy cut” hairstyle required of female interns during criminology training. Using a qualitative phenomenological design, twelve male students from in a university in Oroquieta City, Misamis Occidental, Philippines were interviewed to understand their experiences and interpretations of female grooming standards. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s phenomenological method to identify themes reflecting participants’ initial reactions, perceived professional impact, and treatment of female interns. The findings revealed three major themes: (1) Initial Reactions toward Female Interns with a “Boy Cut” Hairstyle, which described participants’ initial surprise and curiosity that gradually shifted to acceptance as they became familiar with grooming standards in criminology training; (2) Perceived Impact on Professional Image, which highlighted how the hairstyle was associated with discipline, confidence, and professionalism, contributing positively to the interns’ professional identity; and (3) Treatment of Female Interns with “Boy Cut” during Internships, which showed that female interns were generally treated equally, with performance and competence valued more than physical appearance. The findings indicate an evolving understanding of professionalism and femininity within a traditionally male-dominated training environment, where competence, discipline, and conduct are valued more than conventional expectations related to appearance. The study therefore recommends that criminology institutions implement orientation programs, awareness initiatives, and gender-sensitive professional development activities that promote inclusivity while reinforcing grooming standards associated with discipline and professional identity.

criminology students, female internship, professional image

1. Brown, K. L., & Todak, N. (2022). Policing and gender. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.730 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Evans, R., & Moore, K. (2023). Gender norms and the experiences of women in male-dominated professions. Gender, Work & Organization, 30(4), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hernandez, A., & Ortiz, M. (2025). Confidence and professional competence in educational training contexts. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 138, 103845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.103845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Johnson, R., & Lee, S. (2020). Grooming policies and perceptions of uniformed personnel. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 14(1), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pay015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Lee, S., & Park, J. (2024). Cultural expectations and gender identity in professional education settings. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 27(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12589 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Müller, A., & Schmidt, L. (2024). Gender integration and institutional culture in European law enforcement education. European Journal of Criminology, 21(2), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708221123456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Resnik, D. B. (2020). What is ethics in research and why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.013.1270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Reyes, M., & Dela Cruz, P. (2020). Discipline and professional socialization among criminology students in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(3), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.7828/apjmr.v8i3.1462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Santos, J., & Villanueva, R. (2023). Grooming policies and professional identity in criminology education. Journal of Professional Studies, 12(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.210987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Santos, M., & Villanueva, J. (2023). Compliance with professional grooming standards in criminal justice field training. International Journal of Law Enforcement Studies, 8(2), 102–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Simpson, R., & Croft, A. (2020). Seeing gender in policing: Uniforms and perceived aggression. Women & Criminal Justice, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2020.1842290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Williams, D., & Carter, S. (2021). Uniform standards and identity formation in law enforcement training programs. Police Practice and Research, 22(5), 1542–1557. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1846198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Williams, T., & Carter, L. (2021). The role of grooming standards in projecting professional identity among recruits. Journal of Law Enforcement Training and Practice, 5(3), 45–60. (Note: Replace with real DOI or actual publication when available) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar