Tension, Mistrust, and Social Dichotomy Between War Veterans and Communities in Zimbabwe: A Paradox of Privilege and Disconnection

This study investigates the roots of tension, mistrust, and social dichotomy between war veterans and communities in Zimbabwe, across the 10 provinces. Despite multiple welfare interventions, including the War Veterans Act (1992), veterans remain economically vulnerable and socially isolated, while communities perceive them as politically privileged yet disconnected. It aimed to (1) analyse the historical, political, and socio-economic factors contributing to this mistrust and (2) explore community perceptions, coping mechanisms, and potential pathways for reconciliation and integration. It was grounded in two complementary theories: Social Identity Theory, which explains how veterans are positioned as an “in-group” with symbolic authority, and Conflict Transformation Theory, which emphasizes relational and structural change for sustainable peace. Methodologically, the study adopts a pragmatic philosophy, qualitative dominant mixed method approach with an explanatory design. Data were collected through key informant interviews, document analysis of five institutional texts, including the War Veterans Act and African Union DDR Standards complemented by questionnaires. Thematic coding and content analysis, guided by Braun and Clarke’s framework, were used to identify recurring patterns and policy gaps. Abductive reasoning linked empirical findings to theoretical insights. The study concludes that Veteran–community relations in Zimbabwe are defined by a paradox; war veterans, once celebrated as liberators, are now perceived as politically privileged yet socially disconnected, while communities feel excluded and marginalized. This entrenched mistrust cannot be resolved through welfare alone. Sustainable reconciliation requires structural reforms that embed community voices, foster inclusive dialogue, and support grassroots cooperation. Veterans must be repositioned as equal participants in national development, moving beyond politicized, welfare-centric frameworks toward inclusive, community-driven reconciliation strategies that bridge divides and foster genuine social integration. Reconciliation requires more than welfare, it demands structured dialogue, community-driven economic cooperation, and cultural mediation. Reconciliation requires more than welfare, it demands structured dialogue, community-driven economic cooperation, and cultural mediation. It therefore recommendations reforming veteran legislation to embed integration mechanisms, empowering traditional and religious leaders to mediate tensions, and supporting grassroots initiatives that foster shared livelihoods and mutual respect. Ultimately develops an integrated reconciliation and cohesion model for transforming veteran–community relations and advancing inclusive development in Zimbabwe is proposed.

War Veterans, Tension, Mistrust, Social Dichotomy, Politicization and Reconciliation

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identification, self-categorization and social influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 1(1), 195–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aghedo, I. (2013). Winning the war, losing the peace: Amnesty and the challenges of post-conflict peacebuilding in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 48(3), 267–280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alexander, J., & McGregor, J. (2021). Veterans and local councils: Coping with reintegration in Namibia. African Affairs, 120(480), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bangura, Y. (2023). DDR and fragile reintegration in West Africa: Lessons from Sierra Leone and Liberia. Peacebuilding Review, 11(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gear, S. (2002). Wounded heroes: War veterans and post-apartheid South Africa. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 6(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hanlon, J. (2020). Liberators turned marginalized: Veterans and communities in Mozambique. Journal of Southern African Studies, 46(3), 501–520. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jansen, S. (2013). Veteran reintegration in post-war Europe: The cases of Croatia and Germany. European Journal of Peace Studies, 9(1), 23–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. MacLean, A., & Parsons, M. (2010). Reintegration of veterans in North America: Policy frameworks and community engagement. Armed Forces & Society, 36(4), 671–695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. MacLean, A., & Elder, G. H. (2020). Veteran reintegration and community perceptions in the United States. Journal of Military Psychology, 32(2), 101–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Makombe, M. (2020). The reintegration of war veterans in Zimbabwe: Challenges and prospects. Zimbabwe Journal of Social Development, 15(2), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Makombe, S., & Mvere, T. (2025). Demobilisation and politicisation: War veterans and community relations in Zimbabwe. African Peace and Security Studies, 18(1), 33–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Melissa Makombe. (2020). War veterans and community tensions in Zimbabwe: A policy critique. Zimbabwe Policy Review, 12(1), 77–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mutanda, D. (2020). Post-independence DDR and veteran welfare in Zimbabwe. Journal of African Governance, 8(3), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nzongola-Ntalaja, G. (2020). Ex-combatants and community relations in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Central African Peace Studies, 14(2), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Omach, P. (2021). Political patronage and veteran reintegration in Uganda. East African Journal of Political Studies, 19(1), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sesay, M., & Ismail, A. (2020). Community reintegration of ex-combatants in Sierra Leone. West African Peacebuilding Journal, 10(1), 21–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Veteran reintegration and community cohesion: Global best practices. UNDP Policy Brief Series. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. United Nations Peacekeeping. (2024). DDR challenges in South Sudan: Reintegration and institutional fragility. UN Peacekeeping Reports. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Veritas. (2024). Report of the Portfolio Committee on Defence and War Veterans’ Affairs. Parliament of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Woodward, R., Winter, T., & Jenkings, K. N. (2021). Veterans and civilian communities in the UK: Dialogue, welfare, and mistrust. British Journal of Military Sociology, 29(1), 15–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]