Navigating Opportunity and Dependence: A Descriptive Study of the Sino-Nepalese Relations in International Business Since 2005
Authors
Business School, Chengdu University of Technology, Erqianqiao #1, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059 (China)
Business School, Chengdu University of Technology, Erqianqiao #1, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059 (China)
College Of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059 (China)
Business School, Chengdu University of Technology, Erqianqiao #1, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059 (China)
College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059 (China)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300147
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 2091-2103
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-10
Accepted: 2026-03-16
Published: 2026-03-30
Abstract
The strategic relationship between China and Nepal has described the significant transformation since 2005, from traditional diplomatic relations to a multifaceted trade partnership, investment, infrastructure development, and regional connectivity. This paper unveils the evolving nature of the Sino-Nepalese relations through trade, strategic, and geopolitical lenses, employing qualitative analysis of policy documents, academic literature, and media reports. The study used a qualitative research methodology, which involved content analysis of policy documents, trade data, trade MOUs, and elite interviews; the paper discusses the drivers, aspects, and challenges of this bilateral trade connectivity. The result highlights that Chinese investments under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) play an effective role in ensuring infrastructural development in Nepal. In addition, the study unveils that infrastructure development increased trade connectivity and provided alternative development financing. Furthermore, this study also talks about the concerns regarding debt sustainability, strategic autonomy, and trade imbalances, where the trade deficit reached NPR 12.55 billion in the 2004/2005 FY and NPR 338.47 billion in the 2024/2025 FY. The Sino-Nepalese cooperation is also very significant from the regional perspective, particularly in the India-China competition perspective. The geographical location of Nepal also pushes China to make strategic cooperation with Nepal, and it helps to shift power alignments in South Asia. This study developed theoretical perspectives from realism and complex interdependence that provided a balanced analysis of the opportunities and challenges in the Sino-Nepalese relationship. The paper contributes to broader discussions on South Asian geopolitics, small-state diplomacy, and the prospects of Sino-Nepalese collaboration and suggests some policy to ensure sustainable partnership in future perspectives.
Keywords
Sino-Nepalese Relations; Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
Downloads
References
1. Aswasthama Bhakta Kharel. (2024). Influence of Nepal’s Foreign Policy on Domestic Political Dynamics. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 5(2), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijmss.v5i2.69441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Baral, B. N. (2019). Nepal-China-India: Prospects and Challenges of Trilateralism. Journal of Political Science, 19, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3126/jps.v19i0.26696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bastola, S. (2025). Foreign Policy of Nepal: Strategic Approach to Sovereignty. Unity Journal, 6(1), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.3126/unityj.v6i1.75632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bhatta, C. D. (2024). Metamorphosis of Nepal-China Relations. NCWA Annual Journal, 55(01), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.3126/ncwaj.v55i01.63057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bhatta, K. D. (2025). Nepal and the Belt and Road Initiative: Assessing Opportunities and Challenges. Unity Journal, 6(1), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3126/unityj.v6i1.75637 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bhattarai, D. (2019). Understanding the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of APF Command and Staff College, 2(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.3126/japfcsc.v2i1.26750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chan, R. C. K., & Bhatta, K. D. (2023). Trans-Himalayan connectivity and sustainable tourism development in Nepal: A study of community perceptions of tourism impacts along the Nepal–China Friendship Highway. Asian Geographer, 40(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10225706.2021.1943470 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chand, H. P. (2023). Dilemmas, Debates, and Development of BRI in the Himalayan Nation: A Nepali Perspective. Journal of Foreign Affairs, 3(01), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.3126/jofa.v3i01.56508 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Dahal, G. (2019). An Overview of Foreign Relation of Nepal with China. Journal of Political Science, 19, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.3126/jps.v19i0.26700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Gautam, S. (2023). Nepal and China Trade Relations. Voice: A Biannual & Bilingual Journal, 15(2), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.3126/voice.v15i2.61452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Joshi, B., & Adhikari, G. M. (2025). Economic Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Opportunities, Challenges, and Impact on Nepal’s Development. The Harvest, 4(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.3126/harvest.v4i1.75347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kharel, K. R., Upadhyay, Y. M., & Kharel, S. (2021). Nepal-China Bilateral Economic Cooperation Empowering Nepalese Economy. Patan Pragya, 9(02), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.3126/pragya.v9i02.42031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Murton, G., & Lord, A. (2020). Trans-Himalayan power corridors: Infrastructural politics and China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Nepal. Political Geography, 77, 102100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Murton, G., & Plachta, N. (2021). China in Nepal: On the politics of the Belt and Road Initiative development in South Asia. In J. Chinyong Liow, H. Liu, & G. Xue (Eds.), Research Handbook on the Belt and Road Initiative. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789908718.00038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Pulami, M. J. (2022). China-India contemporary relations: Geopolitical challenges to the small states in South Asia. Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.12688/stomiedintrelat.17419.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Sharma, B. P. (2018). China-Nepal Relations: A Cooperative Partnership in Slow Motion. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 04(03), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740018500239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Singh, S. (2000). Sino‐South Asian ties: Problems & prospects. Strategic Analysis, 24(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700160008455194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Thapa, C. (2025). Geopolitical Implications of BRI in South Asia. Journal of APF Command and Staff College, 8(1), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.3126/japfcsc.v8i1.77607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Thapa, S. (2025). SINO-NEPAL RELATION AND STRATEGIC INTERESTS. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5149285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar