Intelligent Data-Driven Crop Recommendation Systems for Farmers: A Systematic Review and Classification
Authors
Bulacan State University, Computer Engineering Department (Philippines)
Bulacan State University, Computer Engineering Department (Philippines)
Bulacan State University, Computer Engineering Department (Philippines)
Bulacan State University, Computer Engineering Department (Philippines)
Bulacan State University, Computer Engineering Department (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300169
Subject Category: Computer Science
Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 2353-2364
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-07
Accepted: 2026-03-12
Published: 2026-03-30
Abstract
Agriculture plays an important role in the Philippines, but Filipino farmers' reliance on traditional practices due to limited access to scientific technology, services, and guidance leaves them vulnerable to poor crop choices, income loss, climate risks, and low yields. This research study proposes developing a reliable, accessible, and climate-resilient crop recommendation approach for farmers. The objective of the study is to identify trends, technological methods, and research gaps. A systematic review with meta-analysis and secondary data analysis of carefully selected published studies is used as the population sampling, rather than actual human beings. To classify crop recommendation systems and identify trends, limitations, and research gaps, data were extracted using a standardized extraction form, categorized, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, mode identification, cross-tabulation, and qualitative thematic analysis. Out of the twenty (20) published studies selected, soil and weather with soil nutrients, pH, moisture, and important field factors constantly influencing the right choices are identified as the crucial input parameters in this study. Common AI-based systems primarily use machine learning and deep learning, deployed via cloud-based architectures, and are organized into a taxonomy based on method, data inputs, and deployment. Reliance on internet connectivity, high hardware costs, and difficult explainability are the challenges found in this study. Furthermore, unexplored areas are conducive to system deployment and also include inadequate farmer-centered design, limited generalizability, limited field validation, and insufficient local datasets. Moreover, researchers recommended using low-cost modular sensors, hybrid cloud–edge or TinyML deployment, and locally representative datasets with field validation.
Keywords
Crop Recommendation System (CRS), Data-Driven System, Decision Support System (DSS)
Downloads
References
1. Ama, N. A., Apdo, R. L., Baclayon, E. K., Boctot, J., Degorio, M. J., Demiao, A., Jason, R. J., Lacbanes, M. R., Malaki, K., & Nuñez, E. (2025). Assessing the relationship between farmer’s perception to agricultural practices, risk management and sustainability. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6893174/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. Scientific Research Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1596232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Büchter, R. B., Weise, A., & Pieper, D. (2020). Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: A review of methodological guidance. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 1–14. https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-020-01143-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive Sampling: Complex or Simple? Research Case Examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cooksey, R. W. (2020). Descriptive Statistics for Summarising Data. Illustrating Statistical Procedures: Finding Meaning in Quantitative Data, 1(1), 61–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2537-7_5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Cross-Tabulation Analysis: A Researcher’s Guide – Qualtrics. (2018). Qualtrics. https://www.qualtrics.com/articles/strategy-research/cross-tabulation/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). Climate-resilient agriculture (CRA) considerations. https://amia.da.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Annex-2.-Full-version-of-the-CRA-country-profile.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Harrod, T. (2023, September 25). Research Guides: Study Design 101: Meta-Analysis. Guides.himmelfarb.gwu.edu. https://guides.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/studydesign101/metaanalysis [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. National University of Singapore. (2023). What is a systematic review? https://medicine.nus.edu.sg/rsu/service/systematic-review/what-is-a-systematic-review/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & McGuinness, L. A. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372(160). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. PhilSEED. (2023, May 18). Top 5 challenges faced by Filipino farmers today. https://www.philseed.org/post/top-5-challenges-faced-by-filipino-farmers-today [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Sprague, R. H., & Carlson, E. D. (1982). Building effective decision support systems. Prentice-Hall. Retrieved January 16, 2026 from https://books.google.com/books/about/Building_Effective_Decision_Support_Syst.html?id=89_sPTAmkVsC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Trần, M. H. (2024, September 22). Smallholder farmers’ challenges and opportunities: Implications for agricultural production, environment and f. HAPRI. https://www.hapri.org/post/smallholder-farmers-challenges-and-opportunities-implications-for-agricultural-production-environ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Xu, J., Gu, B., & Tian, G. (2022). Review of agricultural IoT technology. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2022.01.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
- Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
- Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
- Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
- Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet