Digital Education in ASEAN: A Strategic Framework for Sustainable Growth

The digital transformation of education in Southeast Asia is a journey of high ambition and significant hurdles. This paper addresses a critical "dual gap," a disparity between in-school and out-of-school technology use and the limited impact of EdTech on productivity and cost reduction. It posits that a successful digital shift depends not just on technology, but on strategic management, human-centred design, and ethical practice. Employing a qualitative research approach, this study synthesises academic literature and analyses key policy initiatives and case studies from Malaysia and the broader ASEAN region, including a critical examination of the failed 1BestariNet project. Findings reveal that project failures often stem from poor business models, pedagogical misalignment, and a neglect of data privacy and compliance. The paper concludes with a strategic framework offering actionable recommendations for policymakers, EdTech innovators, and educational leaders, guiding them to build a resilient and equitable digital ecosystem that moves beyond the cycle of hype to achieve lasting, positive change. This includes adopting agile planning, prioritising product-market fit, and strengthening digital literacy to ensure technology serves all students effectively and ethically.

Technology Management, Educational Technology, Marketing, Innovation, Teaching and Learning

1. Adobe. (2024). The future of learning: Revolutionizing education through VR and AR integration. eLearning Industry. https://elearning.adobe.com/2024/04/the-future-of-learning-revolutionizing-education-through-vr-and-ar-integration/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. American Bar Association. (2022). Data privacy in the ASEAN region. International Law News. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/international_law/resources/international-law-news/2022-spring/data-privacy-asean-region/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Castledown. (2024). Why teachers may hesitate to use technology. https://castledown.online/2024/01/20/why-teachers-may-hesitate-to-use-technology/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dincer, N. (2023). Diffusion of innovation in education. https://nazmidincer.com/blog/diffusion-of-innovation-in-education/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. EdSurge. (2021). The edtech company formerly known as AltSchool sold its tech. So what's left? https://www.edsurge.com/news/2021-01-15-the-edtech-company-formerly-known-as-altschool-sold-its-tech-so-what-s-left [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. eLearningIndustry. (2024). Why some teachers struggle with EdTech and how we can help them. https://elearningindustry.com/why-some-teachers-struggle-with-edtech-and-how-we-can-help-them [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. EPAM. (2024). How EdTech companies can overcome AI challenges & build a smarter future. https://www.epam.com/insights/blogs/how-edtech-companies-can-overcome-ai-challenges-and-build-a-smarter-future [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. FTC. (2023). FTC says Ed Tech provider Edmodo unlawfully used children's personal information for advertising and outsourced compliance to school districts. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/05/ftc-says-ed-tech-provider-edmodo-unlawfully-used-childrens-personal-information-advertising [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hillebrand, B., Driessen, P. H., & Koll, O. (2015). Stakeholder marketing: Theoretical foundations and required capabilities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(4), 411-428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Law, N., Pelgrum, H., & Plomp, T. (2008). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. ResearchGate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Loeb & Loeb LLP. (2023). What EdTech companies can learn from the FTC's action against Edmodo. https://www.loeb.com/en/insights/publications/2023/06/what-edtech-companies-can-learn-from-the-ftcs-action-against-edmodo [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2025). National Digital Education Policy to be implemented soon, Fadhlina. BERNAMA. https://www.bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2380804 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Omar, A. K., et al. (2025). Navigating AI ethics in Malaysian universities: Addressing privacy, integrity, and bias. Journal of Technology and Higher Education, 8(1), 121-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Penang Institute. (2025). Bridging the digital divide in Malaysian education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rosli, N. M., et al. (2024). Digital literacy and transformation in ASEAN. ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Policy Brief. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sarac, V., et al. (2025). Towards Energy Efficiency at Induction Motors-Technical and Economic Aspects. TEM Journal, 14(3), 1917-1927. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study