A Frequency Analysis of Linear Versus Non-Linear Images as Persuasive Tools in Students’ Presentation Slides

Authors

Harris Mirza Mohd Rosli

Kuarters Polis E-G-2, Lorong Chempaka 1, Taman Perumahan Polis Diraja Malaysia Kuala Klawang, 71600 Negeri Sembilan (Malaysia)

Amir Lukman Abd Rahman

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, (Malaysia)

Hairul Azhar Mohamad

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, (Malaysia)

Muhammad Haziq Abd Rashid

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, (Malaysia)

Muhammad Luthfi Mohaini

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, (Malaysia)

Pavithran Ravinthra Nath

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, (Malaysia)

Tanakarn Pataburee

Faculty of Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya, Muang District, Songkhla 90000 (Thailand)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID006

Subject Category: Language

Volume/Issue: 9/24 | Page No: 44-56

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-23

Accepted: 2025-09-24

Published: 2025-10-29

Abstract

Visual aids such as linear and non-linear images have been used in students’ presentation slides to keep the audience engaged, motivated, and attentive. As the research uses Dual Coding Theory and Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) as both theoretical and conceptual frameworks, this study aims to conduct a frequency analysis of linear versus non-linear images as persuasive tools in students' presentation slides to determine which type of image is more prominently used by students to convey the idea of their presentation. Through conducting qualitative research with a content analysis design, twenty-six (26) presentation slides created by LG2405D students from UiTM Shah Alam will be collected and become the main key to examine the frequency of linear and non-linear images in students’ presentation slides. The findings of this research are important since they will reflect on why students decide to use either type of image and how they associate it with different persuasion techniques. Based on the findings, student presenters have a strong tendency to use linear images compared to non-linear images in their slides. Next, common types identified in this research for linear images include charts, graphs, and tables, meanwhile, non-linear images such as icons, logos and memes. Lastly, linear image is mostly associated with the Heuristic Systematic Model, whereas non-linear images can be associated with the Elaboration Likelihood Model. Further studies regarding the usage of linear and non-linear images are needed to give clearer insights for future researchers and also to explore the field of study in a broader context.

Keywords

visual aids, linear images, non-linear images, persuasion technique

Downloads

References

1. Abd Rahman, A. L., Mohamad, H. A., Abdul Wahab, N. H., & Abd Rashid, M. H. (2024). Shockvertising – Viewers’ visual communication perspectives of a controversial skincare advertisement. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik (MKP), 37(2), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V37I22024.208-220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andrade, C. (2018). Internal, external, and ecological validity in research design, conduct, and evaluation. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 40(5), 498-499. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_334_18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or Simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Clark, J., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Filieri, R., Lin, Z., Pino, G., Alguezaui, S., & Inversini, A. (2021). The role of visual cues in eWOM on consumers’ behavioral intention and decisions. Journal of Business Research, 135, 663-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hamad, J. I. (2023). The impacts of visual aids in promoting the learning processes in schools in Pakistan. African Journal of Education and Practice, 9(1), 51-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.47604/ajep.1912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hyll, M., Schvarcz, R., & Manninen, K. (2019). Exploring how medical students learn with the help of a digital presentation: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1569-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jamal, I. N., & Mustaffa, N. (2023). The impact of visual communication on students’ learning experience towards memory recognition and enhancement. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Communication and Media, 3(1), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.33102/j [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jatautaite, D., Butrime, E., & Zuzeviciute, V. (2023). Electronic visual learning aids for the effective class in higher education towards metacognitive learning. International Conferences e-Learning and Digital Learning 2023 and Sustainability, Technology and Education 2023, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.33965/EL_STE2023_202303L010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jelemenska, K., Cicak, P., & Ducky, V. (2011). Interactive presentation towards students’ engagement. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1645-1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mohamad, N. A., Ab Aziz, A. A., Razali, N. A., Juned, A. M., & Abdullah, M. (2024). Metadiscourse in the digital academic poster: Examining the textual and visual metadiscourse in the construction of persuasion. Issues in Language Studies, 13(1), 284-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.33736/ils.5739.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mohammed, R. J. (2024). Visual aids as a tool to stimulate creative thinking in the language teaching process. Journal of Language Studies, 8(9), 278-289. https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.8.9.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nghitoolwa, H. T. S., Chirimbana, M., & Medusalem, M. (2024). The impact of teaching aids on the academic performance of learners in natural science. Journal of Education for Sustainable Innovation, 2(1), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.56916/jesi.v2i1.835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19(1), 124-205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Qasserras, L. (2024). The role of visual learning aids across diverse learning styles in high school education. European Journal of Applied Linguistic Studies, 7(2), 68-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v7i2.550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sampson, A. J., & Sampson, E. A. (2020). Visual communication: A review of the persuasive properties of graphic images for advertisements. GRASPACT Journal of Arts and Technology, 1(1), 29-39 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sarfraz, Z., & Irfan, H. (2025). Linguistic analysis of strategies used by Pakistani shampoo brands for marketing purposes in advertisements. Al-Jamei Research Journal, 2(2), 17-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sbampato, K., Arruda, H., & Silva, E. R. (2025). ChatGPT, Phython, and Microsoft Excel. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 113(1), 110-112. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2025.2065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Scheel, C., Mecham, J., Zuccarello, V., & Mattes, R. (2018). An evaluation of the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of OccuPro’s functional capacity evaluation. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assesment & Rehabilitation, 60(3), 465-473. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182754 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Seo, K. (2020). Meta-analysis on visual persuasion – Does adding images to texts influence persuasion? Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 6(3), 177-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.6-3-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wijayanti, S. H., Widyastuti, T. D., Ristyantoro, R., & Pramono, H. (2025). An investigation of the quality of presentation slide design and oral communication in higher education. Journal of Research in Instructional, 5(1), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v5i1.608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Willyarto, M. N., Werhoru, D., Januarta, S., & Rivaldo. (2020). Visual aid presentation as a learning method: A case study in learning English of management students in Binus University. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1566/1/012023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles