Geopolitics, Power, Space and Resources in the Quest for Sustainable Development

The purpose of this paper is to examine the interrelationship between intensifying geopolitical competition and the global pursuit of sustainable development in the twenty-first century. The key objectives are to analyse how geopolitical dynamics shape and constrain sustainable development, to explore the interaction between power, spatial contestation, and resource competition, and to assess their implications for achieving global development goals. The study adopts an interdisciplinary methodology, drawing on critical geopolitics, political ecology, international relations theory, and development studies, supported by comparative case studies and the use of statistical and environmental performance data. The findings demonstrate that geopolitical competition significantly influences development outcomes through three main dimensions: the distribution of power in the international system, the governance and contestation of geographic space, and competition over natural resources such as fossil fuels, critical minerals, and freshwater. Case studies reveal stark inequalities between developed and developing countries, showing how structural power imbalances hinder equitable progress toward sustainable development. The study also finds that traditional geopolitical approaches often undermine cooperative frameworks necessary for sustainability, while alternative perspectives rooted in critical and environmental geopolitics provide pathways for more collaborative and inclusive governance. The paper concludes that sustainable development and geopolitics are fundamentally interconnected and must be analysed within a unified framework. It proposes a reconceptualised “green geopolitics” that integrates power, ecological sustainability, and global cooperation, offering important implications for policy, theory, and the future of global governance.

geopolitics; critical geopolitics; power

1. Agyeman, J., Schlosberg, D., Craven, L., & Matthews, C. (2016). Trends and directions in environmental justice: From inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Büscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2020). The conservation revolution: Radical ideas for saving nature beyond the Anthropocene. Verso. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Nardin, T., Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C., & True, J. (2022). Theories of international relations (6th ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dalby, S. (2020). Anthropocene geopolitics: Globalization, security, sustainability. University of Ottawa Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Flint, C. (2022). Introduction to geopolitics (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003280931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gallagher, K. P., & Kozul-Wright, R. (2022). The case for a new Bretton Woods. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Harvey, D. (2004). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hickel, J. (2021). Less is more: How degrowth will save the world. Windmill Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. International Energy Agency. (2023). World energy outlook 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. International Renewable Energy Agency. (2023). Renewable power generation costs in 2022. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kalantzakos, S. (2020). The race for critical minerals in an era of geopolitical realignments. The International Spectator, 55(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2020.1786926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Klare, M. T. (2019). All hell breaking loose: The Pentagon's perspective on climate change. Metropolitan Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Müller, M. (2020). In search of the global east: Thinking between north and south. Geopolitics, 25(3), 734–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1573269 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Okereke, C. (2021). Global justice and climate governance: Bridging the divide between theory and practice. Global Governance, 27(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02702004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Scholte, J. A., Biedenkopf, K., Petiteville, F., Pianta, M., Risse, T., & Zürn, M. (2021). Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 27(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02701001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & El-Anis, I. (2021). An introduction to international relations theory: Perspectives and themes (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315797233 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. United Nations. (2022). The sustainable development goals report 2022. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. (2023). Global land outlook: Thematic report on land degradation in the Sahel. https://www.unccd.int/resources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. United Nations Environment Programme. (2011). Environmental assessment of Ogoniland. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/environmental-assessment-ogoniland [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2023). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2022. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. World Bank. (2023). Democratic Republic of Congo economic update: Investing in people. https://www.worldbank.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. World Food Programme. (2023). Global report on food crises 2023. https://www.wfp.org/publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., Warner, J., Kirkegaard, S., & Cascão, A. (2020). Analysis for water conflict transformation. Water International, 45(5), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2020.1711235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar