Enhancing Error-Visibility of Assessment Practices for Sustainable Educational Reform: A Monitoring and Evaluation Perspective

Assessment remains central to the integrity and effectiveness of tertiary education, serving as a vital tool for measuring student learning outcomes and ensuring accountability. However, hidden errors in assessment practices—including flaws in design, administration, marking, and interpretation—undermine fairness, validity, and trust in higher education. Enhancing error-visibility, the ability to detect and understand such errors, is essential for sustainable educational reform. This paper explores how the potential of unobtrusive observation as a robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) mechanism, in increasing the visibility of such errors, can promote sustainable educational reform. Through immersion in the lived realities of assessment processes, unobtrusive observers provide nuanced insights into human, systemic, and contextual factors often missed by other data gathering methods. The paper discusses theoretical underpinnings, methodological considerations, benefits, and ethical challenges, emphasizing the role of unobtrusive observation in promoting reflective practice, accountability, and continuous improvement in tertiary assessment systems. Drawing on systems theory and total quality management principles, the study emphasizes the role of error-detection, assessment audits, and stakeholder feedback in improving assessment quality. Recommendations are provided for integrating error-visibility into institutional and national education quality assurance frameworks.

Error-visibility, assessment practices, monitoring and evaluation

1. Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bloxham, S., Hughes, C., & Adie, L. (2016). What’s the point of moderation? Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(4), 638–653. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2019). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for thelonger term. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hanna, G. S., & Dettmer, P. A. (2004). Assessment for effective teaching. Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning. Assessment in Education, 4(3), 365–379. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Yorke, M. (2011). Summative assessment: Dealing with the measurement fallacy. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 251–273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being