Real Economic Backing and Ontological Legitimacy: A Foundational Principle for Shariah-Compliant Cryptocurrencies
Authors
PhD Student, Islamic Civilization Academy, Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities, University Technology (Malaysia)
Professor, Islamic Civilization Academy, Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities; Center of Research in Fiqh Science and Technology (CFiRST), University Technology (Malaysia)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-13
Accepted: 2026-03-18
Published: 2026-04-02
Abstract
The proliferation of decentralized cryptocurrencies has introduced significant epistemological and regulatory friction within Islamic finance due to their disconnect from real economic activities. Traditional cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, suffer from a severe "ontological deficit" as they exist purely as abstract cryptographic data without any physical manifestation, central sovereign authority, or intrinsic value. This lack of material foundation relegates these digital assets to extreme price volatility and speculative trading, directly violating Shariah prohibitions against excessive uncertainty (gharar) and speculative gambling (maysir). To reconcile blockchain innovation with Islamic ethical imperatives, this study shifts the narrative from basic binary halal-haram debates toward establishing a comprehensive ontological framework. Through literature analysis and personal interviews, the study proposes that "real economic backing" is an uncompromising foundational prerequisite for Shariah-compliant cryptocurrencies. The findings highlight four critical analytical dimensions required to legitimize cryptocurrencies: (1) Cryptocurrencies must overcome their ontological deficiency by possessing a real existence, rather than being purely imaginary or virtual data. (2) Cryptocurrencies must hold intrinsic value and legitimate utility to be classified as legally recognized and tradable wealth (māl mutaqawwam). (3) Cryptocurrencies require structural linkage to the real economy through asset-backed tokenization, ensuring returns originate from genuine productive activities rather than zero-sum speculation. (4) Pegging digital tokens to tangible reserves like gold or stable fiat currencies acts as a mechanical stabilizing mechanism to neutralize extreme price shocks and aligns with the classical Islamic monetary tradition. Ultimately, the study concludes that asset-backed tokenization transforms blockchain technology from a high-risk speculative tool into a robust, stable financial infrastructure. This structural integration ensures that cryptocurrencies serve the real economy, safeguard wealth, and fulfill the core objectives of Islamic law.
Keywords
Real Economic Backing, Shariah-Compliant Cryptocurrencies; Ontological Legitimacy; Asset-Backed Tokenization
Downloads
References
1. Abdullah, M. (2024). Personal interview. May 8, 2024, at the Department of Economic Development – Sharjah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abu Husayn, U. (2019). The Sharī‘ah ruling on dealing with virtual currencies. In Virtual Currencies in the Balance (p. 125). University of Sharjah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adamu, A. I., Ardo, H., & Bomai, N. M. (2025). An Analysis of Cryptocurrency: Islamic Law Perspective. Historical: Journal of History and Social Sciences, 4(4), 469-475. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ajouz, M., Abdullah, A., & Kassim, S. (2020). Developing a Sharīʿah-compliant precious metal backed cryptocurrency. JKAU: Islamic Economics, 33(1), 3–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Alam, N., Gupta, L., & Zameni, A. (2019). Cryptocurrency and Islamic Finance. In Fintech and Islamic Finance (pp. 99-118). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Al-Ali, A. (2024). Personal interview. August 19, 2024, via email. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Al-Harthi, T. (2024). Personal interview. 11 Jun 2024, via WhatsApp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ali, F., Bouri, E., Naifar, N., Shahzad, S. J. H., & AlAhmad, M. (2022). An examination of whether gold-backed Islamic cryptocurrencies are safe havens for international Islamic equity markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 63, 101768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Al-Naqbi, S. (2024). Personal interview. 26 Februari 2024, via WhatsApp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Aloui, C., ben Hamida, H., & Yarovaya, L. (2021). Are Islamic gold-backed cryptocurrencies different? Finance Research Letters, 39, 101615. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Al-Shaghaneh, K. (2024). Personal interview. 12 Mac 2024, at hotel in Dubai. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Al-Shāṭibī, I. M. (1997). Al-Muwāfaqāt fī uṣūl al-sharīʿah (ʿA. Darrāz, Ed.). Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Maʿrifah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Al-Yassi, H.M (2026). “A Conceptual Framework For Sharia-Compliant Cryptocurrency Standards In The United Arab Emirates”. Phd Thesis, Academy Of Islamic Civilization, Faculty Of Social Sciences & Humanitites, University Technology Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Andarianti, M., & Huda, B. (2025). Utilising Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah into Cryptocurrency Structure: A Halal and Stable Digital Finance Model. Journal of Islamic Business and Economics (JIBEC), 1(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Asif, M., & Sultan, A. (2025). A Thematic Analysis of Fatwas on Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Governance (IJIEG), 6(2), 96–114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Bakar, N. A., Rosbi, S., & Uzaki, K. (2017). Cryptocurrency framework diagnostics from Islamic finance perspective: A new insight of bitcoin system transaction. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 4(1), 19-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Bayramova, A., & Edwards, D. J. (2025). A study of objectivity and subjectivity in research methodology selection. Quality & Quantity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Benali, F. Z., et al. (2025). The Algorithmic Fiqh: Qiyas and the Cryptocurrency Paradigm. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law, 8(1), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Billah, M. M. (2019). Cryptocurrency? Its halal alternative model. In Halal Cryptocurrency Management (pp. 3–14). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Bouncken, R. B., Czakon, W., & Schmitt, F. (2025). Purposeful sampling and saturation in qualitative research methodologies: recommendations and review. Review of Managerial Science, 1-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Central Bank of Jordan. (2020). Cryptocurrencies. Group of Employees, Department of Supervision and Oversight of the National Payments System. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Chong, F. H. L. (2021). Enhancing trust through digital Islamic finance and blockchain technology. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 13(3), 328–341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Elshqirat, M. (2025). Toward an Islamic Cryptocurrency: A Proposed Halal Coin. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 25(3), 64-81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Fauzi, M., Kusnadi, K., Musdizal, M., & Rafzan, R. (2022). Mata uang digital (cryptocurrency): Apakah statusnya memenuhi kriteria harta (maal) dan mata uang dalam Islam? Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah: AICONOMIA, 1(2), 72-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Hafiz, A., Napisah, N., Jalili, I., Armasito, A., & Solihu, A. K. H. (2025). Crypto Currency Investment from an Islamic Law Perspective: An Overview of Guidelines and Considerations. Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat, 25(1), 200-218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Haouam, I. (2025). Leveraging AI for advancements in qualitative research methodology. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 7, 85-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Haq, M., & Yasin, N. (2025). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodology paradigms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 6(6), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Hassan, M. K., Muneeza, A., & Mohamed, I. (2025). Cryptocurrencies from Islamic perspective. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 16(2), 390–410. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Havidz, S. A. H., Anddromeda, F., Rahardjo, J. V., & Kurniawati, G. A. (2024). Are Islamic gold-backed cryptocurrencies bridging digital and traditional assets in OIC emerging markets? Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 15(2), 322-325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Hoque, M. E., Billah, M., Alam, M. R., & Tiwari, A. K. (2024). Gold-Backed Cryptocurrencies: A Hedging Tool against Categorical and Regional Financial Stress. Global Finance Journal, 60, 100964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Katterbauer, K., Syed, H., Cleenewerck, L., & Genc, S. Y. (2022). Sharia Compliance of Cryptocurrencies: Data-Driven Sharia Compliance Assessment. Talaa: Journal of Islamic Finance, 2(2), 75-85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Khan, S. N. (2023). The legality of cryptocurrency from an Islamic perspective: A research note. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(2), 289-294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Makateng, D. S., & Mokala, N. T. (2025). Understanding qualitative research methodology: A systematic review. E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences, 6(3), 327-335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Meera, A. K. M. (2018). Cryptocurrencies from Islamic perspectives: The case of Bitcoin. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 20(4), 443–460. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Nabeel, M. K., & Sumathy, M. (2023). Cryptocurrency: An Islamic finance perspective. Al-Muhasib: Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance, 3(1), 55-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Othman, R., et al. (2023). Muslim Scholars' and Experts' Views on Cryptocurrency: A Systematic Literature Review. Sains Insani, 8(1), 94–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Prasmanto, J. R., et al. (2025). Bitcoin and Riba: Evaluating Interest-Free Nature and Risks of Secondary Financial Applications. Journal of Islamic Law and Legal Studies, 2(1), 36–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Saleh, A. H. A. I., Ibrahim, A. A., Noordin, M. F., & Mohadis, H. M. (2020). Factors influencing adoption of cryptocurrency-based transaction from an Islamic perspective. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 20(4), 21-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Sanuri, Hilmy, M., Mubarok, N., Azizah, I., & Irama, Y. (2025). A Maslahah-Based Review of MUI's Fatwa on Cryptocurrency: A Cognizant Human Perspective. SYARIAH: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 25(1), 43-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Shabīr, M. U. (2010). Al-Madkhal ilā fiqh al-mu’āmalāt al-māliyyah: Al-māl, al-milkiyyah, al-’aqd. Amman: Dār an-Nafā’is. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Shalabī, M. M. (1985). Al-Madkhal fī al-fiqh al-Islāmī: Ta’rīfuhu wa tārīkhuhu wa mazāhibuhu. Dār al-Jāmi‘ah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Sholeh, M. A. N., Faiz, M. F., & Anwar, M. M. (2022). A critical analysis of Islamic law and fatwa of MUI (Majelis Ulama Indonesia) & NU (Nahdlatul Ulama’) on a gold-backed cryptocurrency (OneGram). Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, 17(2), 506–530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Sidiq, M. Y., & Muliana, S. (2025). Analysis of the Sharia-based crypto-asset regulatory framework in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Journal of Islamic Law on Digital Economy and Business, 1(1), 36–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Siswantoro, D., Handika, R., & Mita, A. F. (2020). The requirements of cryptocurrency for money, an Islamic view. Heliyon, 6(1), e03235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Szabó, Z. A., Soós, S., & Schiller, E. (2023). Deductive content analysis as a research method in the field of education sciences – A systematic literature review of journal articles in Web of Science (2019–2023). Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Tilman, C. B., Belo, A. P., dos Santos Seixas, H., de Jesus Belo, J. F., & Guterres, D. J. (2025). The Literature Depth Review on the Study Design in Qualitative Research Methodology (2025). American Journal of Medical and Clinical Research & Reviews, 4(4), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Wahab, N. A., Kamis, N. S., Zainol, Z., & Mahfudz, A. A. (2023). Shariah perspective on crypto as asset (mal): Justifying the needs of estate planning and inheritance of digital asset. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 24, 157-167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Wasiuzzaman, S., Muhd Azwan, A. N., & Hj Nordin, A. N. (2023). Analysis of the performance of Islamic gold-backed cryptocurrencies during the bear market of 2020. Emerging Markets Review, 54, 100920. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Zahid, A., Amin, K., Mohammed, & Arif. (2025). Regulating cryptocurrencies: A comparative analysis between MiCA’s regulatory framework and the core principles of Islamic finance. International Journal of Business and Management Practices (IJBMP), 3(3), 217–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Zainuddin, Z., Aswari, A., Ramadani, R., & Buana, A. (2024). Polarisation of Islamic scholars on the legality of cryptocurrency usage as currency. Arena Hukum, 17(2), 448-464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Zulkarnaen, W. (2025). Between Sharia Compliance and Digital Speculation: Cryptocurrency Discourse in Contemporary Indonesian Islamic Economic Thought. Journal of Islamic Economic Resources, 1(1), 39–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
- Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
- The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
- An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
- The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.