When Signs Speak: A Linguistic Landscape of Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, UiTM Shah Alam

This study investigates the linguistic landscape (LL) of Akademi Pengajian Bahasa (APB), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, focusing on how language use and text composition reflect institutional priorities and inclusivity. APB is a key faculty offering courses in Bahasa Melayu (BM) or Malay language, English, Arabic, and other languages, yet questions remain on whether its signage embodies the faculty’s nature. Using a mixed-methods design, the study documented 174 signs in APB. Semi-structured interviews conducted with students provided insights into readers’ perceptions of the faculty’s LL. Findings revealed that APB’s LL is dominated by monolingual signs with 68%. Among bilingual and multilingual signs text composition, partial translation, with BM and English, was the most prevalent. Other languages taught and offered by the faculty were almost entirely absent, despite their curricular significance. The students, during the interview, agreed that the signs do not really reflect the focus of the faculty and they believed that the language courses offered should be reflected in the faculty’s LL. From the findings it could also be concluded that LL of the faculty does not promote other languages besides BM and English. This could be due to the fact that more than 95% of the students in the faculty comprise of local students whose native language is BM and are able to understand English. However, given the fact that the faculty focuses on language courses, it should realise the potential of promoting the use of the languages it offers in its linguistic landscape.

educational space, linguistic landscape, multilingualism

1. Aini, A. A. S. (2017). Policy, practice and perceptions of linguistic landscape in the Klang Valley, Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aini, A. A. S., Chan, S. H., & Abdullah, N. A. (2013). Exploring multilingual practices in billboard advertisements in a linguistic landscape. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 21(2), 783–796. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Backhaus, P. (2005). Signs of multilingualism in Tokyo: A linguistic landscape approach (Doctoral dissertation, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Backhaus, P. (2007). Linguistic landscapes: A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M. H., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2004). Linguistic landscape and multiculturalism: A Jewish-Arab comparative study. Tel Aviv: Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M. H., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Brown, K. D. (2012). The linguistic landscape of educational spaces: Language revitalization and schools in southeastern Estonia. In D. Gorter, H. F. Marten, & L. Van Mensel (Eds.), Minority languages in the linguistic landscape (pp. 281–298). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360235_16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Clorion, F. D. D., Bulado, A. J., Encarnacion, B. A., Dumagay, A. H., Ellomer, G. A., Albani, S. E., Pil, A. O., Devanadera, A. C., Rillo, R. M., Alrefaee, Y., & Alieto, E. O. (2024). Exploring linguistic signage in higher education: An empirical study of a linguistically diverse context. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(1), Article 2049. https://doi.org/10.59400/FLS.v6i1.2049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Coluzzi, P., & Kitade, R. (2015). The languages of places of worship in the Kuala Lumpur area: A study on the “religious” linguistic landscape in Malaysia. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.3.02col [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Husin, M., Ariffin, K., Mello, G., Omar, N., & Anuarudin, A. A. S. (2019). Mapping the linguistic landscape of Kuala Lumpur. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijmal.v3i2.7362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jiao, Y., & Singh, M. K. M. (2024). Linguistic landscape in George Town, Malaysia: Language visibility in postcolonial context. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4814882 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Manan, S. A., & David, M. K. (2016). Language ideology and the linguistic landscape. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 11(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v11i1.20228 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Motschenbacher, H. (2023). Contrasting a university’s language policy with its linguistic landscape: A Norwegian case study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 25(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2023.2283652 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Povalko, P., Smolii, E., & Kolysheva, O. (2023). Linguistic landscape of an international university campus: Approaches, features, findings. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 14(4), 1321–1336. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-4-1321-1336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Reh, M. (2004). Multilingual writing: A reader-oriented typology—with examples from Lira Municipality (Uganda). International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 170, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2004.2004.170.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourse in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Shohamy, E., & Waksman, S. (2009). Linguistic landscape as an ecological arena: Modalities, meanings, negotiations, education. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 313–331). New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Siricharoen, A. (2016). Multilingualism in the linguistic landscape of the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, 19(3), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-01903002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wang, X., & Xu, D. (2018). The mismatches between minority language practices and national language policy in Malaysia: A linguistic landscape approach. Kajian Malaysia, 36(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2018.36.1.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wang, Y. (2017). Language policy in Chinese higher education: A focus on international students in China. European Journal of Language Policy, 9(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2017.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Woo, W. S., & Riget, N. P. (2020). Linguistic landscape in Kuala Lumpur International Airport, Malaysia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(5), 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1742724 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zhang, Z. (2024). Linguistic landscape at University of Malaya in Kuala Lumpur. Journal of Language Testing & Assessment, 7(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.23977/langta.2024.070104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study