Executive Function Deficits and Emotion Dysregulation as Neurocognitive Predictors of Violent Behaviour in Forensic Populations: A Systematic Review and Clinical Implications

Authors

Ndorenyin Saviour Udofia

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of South Wales, UK (Nigeria)

Dumebi Okuagu

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of South Wales, UK (Nigeria)

Anthony, Clement Ogbeh

Department of Public Health, National Open University of Nigeria (Nigeria)

Ihuoma Goodness Dike

Department of Public Health, University of Hertfordshire, UK (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1017PSY0015

Subject Category: Psychology

Volume/Issue: 10/17 | Page No: 259-266

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-18

Accepted: 2026-03-23

Published: 2026-04-04

Abstract

Background: This systematic review synthesises existing literature on executive function deficits and emotion dysregulation as predictors of violent behaviour in forensic samples.
Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025. Included studies focused on adult forensic populations, employed validated measures of EF and/or emotion regulation (ER), assessed violent or aggressive outcomes, and utilised cross-sectional, cohort, or review designs. Selection followed PRISMA guidelines. Data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers, with effect sizes synthesised narratively due to methodological heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed using an adapted NIH/NHLBI risk-of-bias tool.
Results: From 1,597 initial records, 55 studies met inclusion criteria. Inhibitory control deficits consistently distinguished violent from non-violent offenders. Meta-analytic evidence indicated modest EF impairments in justice-involved adults compared to controls (d = 0.55 overall; d = 0.72 for adults). Modest, significant correlations were found between ED measures and aggression (pooled r = 0.25–0.33), with ED explaining incremental variance in aggression beyond trait emotionality. Study quality was mixed, with few prospective designs and substantial methodological heterogeneity across studies (I² > 80% for ER-aggression relationships).

Keywords

Executive Function Deficits, Emotion Dysregulation, Violent Behavior, Forensic Populations, Neurocognitive Predictors

Downloads

References

1. Chaguendo-Quintero, M. A., Quintero-Monjes, D., Cuervo, M. T., & Sanabria‐Mazo, J. P. (2023). Alterations in executive functions in inmates convicted for violent behavior: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1066474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Choi, G. J., & Kang, H. (2025). Heterogeneity in meta-analyses: an unavoidable challenge worth exploring. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.25001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Garofalo, C., & Velotti, P. (2017). Negative emotionality and aggression in violent offenders: The moderating role of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 51, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.05.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Griffith, R. L., Nowalis, S., & Monroe-Gulick, A. (2024). Executive functioning and offending behavior: An updated meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231225260 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Janes, S., Lindsey, G. M., O’Rourke, S., & Matthias, S. (2023). Examining the cognitive contributors to violence risk in forensic samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 101887–101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2023.101887 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Meddeb, A., Garofalo, C., Gillespie, S. M., Dongen, van, Malin, H. K., & Märta, W. (2026). A systematic review of measures of emotion regulation in forensic settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1696832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Meijers, J., Harte, J. M., Meynen, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2017). Differences in executive functioning between violent and non-violent offenders. Psychological Medicine, 47(10), 1784–1793. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291717000241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & McGuinness, L. A. (2021). PRISMA 2020 Explanation and elaboration: Updated Guidance and Exemplars for Reporting Systematic Reviews. British Medical Journal, 372(160). NCBI. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Salinas, K. Z., & Venta, A. (2021). Testing the Role of Emotion Dysregulation as a Predictor of Juvenile Recidivism. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11010007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Smith, K., Jones, A., Daly, N., Widdrington, H., Garofalo, C., & Gillespie, S. M. (2025). Emotion Regulation and Aggression: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 52(1), e70055–e70055. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.70055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Tonnaer, F., Cima, M., & Arntz, A. (2016). Executive (Dys)Functioning and Impulsivity as Possible Vulnerability Factors for Aggression in Forensic Patients. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 204(4), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000000485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles