Memes as Digital Activism Tools For Political Accountability in Kenya: A Study of Tiktok and X (Formerly Twitter) During the 2024 Finance Bill Protests

This study examines the role of internet memes in digital activism for political accountability in Kenya, focusing on the #RejectFinanceBill2024 and #OccupyParliament campaigns. Using a qualitative research design, the study analyzed 500 political memes from TikTok and X (formerly Twitter) alongside semi-structured interviews with 182 participants including digital activists, meme creators, policymakers, and political analysts. Grounded in Networked Publics Theory and Framing Theory, the research investigated how memes simplify complex policy issues, shape political discourse, mobilize citizens, and interact with platform dynamics. Findings reveal that satirical images and video memes (62% of content) effectively framed political leaders as accountable for governance failures, while viral political jokes (24%) and remix culture (14%) enhanced engagement through cultural resonance. The study demonstrates that memes function as powerful instruments of digital resistance, generating public pressure (74% of cases) and government responsiveness (58%), though their impact on sustained policy reform remains limited. Platform algorithms significantly influenced visibility, with TikTok's For You Page amplifying protest content to wider audiences compared to X's reported content suppression. The research concludes that while memes successfully mobilize episodic activism and shape public opinion, translating online momentum into structural accountability requires complementary offline advocacy strategies and transparent platform governance frameworks.

digital activism, internet memes, Kenya, Networked Publics Theory

1. Z. Tufekci, Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. N. Nyabola, Digital Democracy, Analogue Politics: How the Internet Era is Transforming Politics in Kenya. London: Zed Books, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. The Guardian, "Kenya protests: Gen Z shows the power of digital activism," 2025. [Online]. Available: https://theconversation.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. L. Shifman, Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. R. M. Milner, The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. M. Castells, Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet), "Kenya digital report 2023," Nairobi, Kenya, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. P. Gathara, "The evolution of digital activism in Kenya," African Journal of Media Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 45-62, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. J. Mwaura, "Kenya protests: Gen Z shows the power of digital activism," The Conversation, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. T. Highfield, Social Media and Everyday Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. A. Chadwick, The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. D. M. Boyd, "Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications," in A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, Z. Papacharissi, Ed. New York: Routledge, 2010, pp. 39-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. R. M. Entman, "Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm," Journal of Communication, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 51-58, 1993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. M. Joyce, Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change. New York: Idebate Press, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. S. George and D. Leidner, "From clicktivism to activism: A typology of digital engagement," Information and Organization, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 100-250, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. B. Mutsvairo and H. Ronning, "Political participation in Africa: New media, democracy, and civic engagement," in The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa, B. Mutsvairo, Ed. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, pp. 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. N. Tsika, Digital Satire and Political Engagement: The Rise of TikTok in African Youth Culture. London: Routledge, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. S. J. Jackson et al., "#HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice*. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. M. W. Gateri, "The legal and ethical challenges of social media regulation in Kenya," African Journal of Media Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 34-51, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. G. Yang, "Hashtag activism: The promise and peril of social media," in The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, D. A. Snow et al., Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. D. Wanyama, "How #RejectFinanceBill2024 mobilized Kenyan youth," The East African, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. M. Bossetta, "The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. election," New Media & Society, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1-23, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. L. Shifman, "Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 362-377, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. L. Shifman, Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. T. Highfield, "Political memes and the politics of memetics," Journal of Visual Culture, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 207-221, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. I. Chiluwa and P. Ifukor, "'War against our children': Stance and evaluation in #BringBackOurGirls campaign discourse on Twitter and Facebook," Discourse & Society, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 267-296, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. R. M. Milner, "Hacking the social: Internet memes, identity antagonism, and the logic of lulz," The Fibreculture Journal, vol. 22, pp. 1-15, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. F. Adejunowicz, "Memes and social movements: The case of #EndSARS in Nigeria," Journal of African Cultural Studies, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1-15, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. T. Bosch, "Twitter activism and youth in South Africa: The case of #FeesMustFall," Information, Communication & Society, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 221-232, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. H. Wasserman, "Social media and the 'new' protest movements in Africa," in Routledge Handbook of African Media and Communication Studies, W. Mano and W. L. Gray, Eds. London: Routledge, 2020, pp. 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. T. Poell and J. van Dijck, "Platformization," in The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, J. Burgess et al., Eds. London: SAGE, 2018, pp. 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. T. Gillespie, "Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media," Yale University Press, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. M. A. DeVito, "From editors to algorithms: A values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed," Digital Journalism, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 753-773, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. S. Roberts, "Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media," Yale University Press, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. G. V. et al., "The role of user engagement in political communication," New Media & Society, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1-20, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. R. Caplan and T. Gillespie, "Moderation, content classification, and the presentation of online speech," International Journal of Communication, vol. 14, pp. 1-15, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mozilla Foundation, "TikTok and political content in Kenya: Algorithmic amplification and ethnic polarization," San Francisco, CA, Tech. Rep., 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. KICTANet, "Digital rights in Kenya: Platform governance and content moderation," Nairobi, Kenya, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. A. Schedler, "Conceptualizing accountability," in The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, A. Schedler et al., Eds. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1999, pp. 13-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. S. Smits et al., "Digital activism and political accountability in Africa," African Affairs, vol. 120, no. 480, pp. 1-25, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. P. N. Howard and M. M. Hussain, Democracy's Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. E. Morozov, The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: PublicAffairs, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Z. Tufekci, "Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest," Yale University Press, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. B. Mutsvairo and B. Karam, "Political participation in Africa: New media, democracy, and civic engagement," in The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa, B. Mutsvairo, Ed. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, pp. 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Freedom Square News, "Finance Bill 2024: From online outrage to offline protests," Nairobi, Kenya, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. E. Morozov, "The brave new world of slacktivism," Foreign Policy, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. U. Flick, An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 6th ed. London: SAGE, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Communications Authority of Kenya, "Quarterly sector statistics report," Nairobi, Kenya, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. C. Teddlie and F. Yu, "Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples," Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77-100, 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. W. G. Cochran, Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. G. Guest et al., "How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability," Field Methods, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59-82, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. A. Bryman, Social Research Methods, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. B. Mutsvairo and S. Borges-Rey, "Digital activism in Africa: New media and social movements," in The Routledge Handbook of Digital Media and Global Change, J. Hunsinger et al., Eds. London: Routledge, 2021, pp. 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. S. Kvale and S. Brinkmann, InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. S. Kvale and S. Brinkmann, InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. S. Kvale and S. Brinkmann, InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. K. Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. K. Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. L. Shifman, Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. L. Shifman, "Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 362-377, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. G. A. Bowen, "Document analysis as a qualitative research method," Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 27-40, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. UNESCO, "Digital rights and platform governance in Africa," Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. V. Braun and V. Clarke, "Using thematic analysis in psychology," Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. V. Braun and V. Clarke, Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: SAGE, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. J. M. Corbin and A. Strauss, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1985. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. H. B. Morrow and M. J. B. Morrow, "Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research," Counseling Psychologist, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1-15, 1995. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. National Commission for Science, Technology, and Innovation (NACOSTI), "Guidelines for ethical research in Kenya," Nairobi, Kenya, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1979. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), "Data management and security protocols," Nairobi, Kenya, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Access Now, "#KeepItOn: Fighting internet shutdowns around the world," 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.accessnow.org/keepiton [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. L. Shifman, Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. D. Wanyama, "How #RejectFinanceBill2024 mobilized Kenyan youth," The East African, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. G. Yang, "Hashtag activism: The promise and peril of social media," in The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, D. A. Snow et al., Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. D. M. Boyd, "Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications," in A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, Z. Papacharissi, Ed. New York: Routledge, 2010, pp. 39-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. D. Yambo, "Citizen journalism and the Githurai massacre: Digital evidence and state accountability," African Journalism Studies, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 1-18, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. M. Ogola, "Social media, misinformation, and the 2022 Kenyan elections," Journal of African Media Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 301-318, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. S. Thomas and G. Fowler, "Influencer activism: The role of social media personalities in political mobilization," New Media & Society, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1-20, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. A. Abidin, "Influencer activism: Affective political economies of lifestyle influencers," Media International Australia, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. A. Mare, "Surveillance and the digital public sphere in Zimbabwe," African Journalism Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1-20, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. R. M. Entman, "Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm," Journal of Communication, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 51-58, 1993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. R. M. Entman, "Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm," Journal of Communication, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 51-58, 1993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. D. Chong and J. N. Druckman, "Framing theory," Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 10, pp. 103-126, 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. S. Khamis et al., "Sheng and digital activism in Kenya: Language, identity, and political expression," Journal of African Cultural Studies, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. J. Waithaka, "Political memes and vernacular politics in Kenya," African Affairs, vol. 122, no. 487, pp. 1-22, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. R. M. Milner, The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. S. Limor and L. Shifman, "The social construction of factuality in digital culture," New Media & Society, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 563-579, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. T. Highfield, "Political memes and the politics of memetics," Journal of Visual Culture, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 207-221, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. T. Highfield, Social Media and Everyday Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. R. M. Milner, "Hacking the social: Internet memes, identity antagonism, and the logic of lulz," The Fibreculture Journal, vol. 22, pp. 1-15, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. L. Shifman, Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Transparency International Kenya, "From tweets to streets: Assessing the impact of digital activism in Kenya," Nairobi, Kenya, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. KICTANet, "Digital rights in Kenya: Platform governance and content moderation," Nairobi, Kenya, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. C. Newton, "Platform governance under Musk: Changes to Twitter's content moderation," The Verge, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. D. M. Boyd, "Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications," in A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, Z. Papacharissi, Ed. New York: Routledge, 2010, pp. 39-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. T. Gillespie, "Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media," Yale University Press, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. T. Poell and J. van Dijck, "Platformization," in The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, J. Burgess et al., Eds. London: SAGE, 2018, pp. 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Weaponizing Words in a Connected World: Digital Microaggressions, Weaponised Communication, and Technology-Governed Exposure
• Harnessing Social Media Content Creation for Youth Employment in Ogun-West Senatorial District, Nigeria